Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do medication and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

ok i know nothing about envlpoes theres a crown and 0025 and the date posted nothing else on the envlope

 

 

Scooby:

 

No UK law firm intent on discharging its professional obligations to a client in respect of a serious legal matter would dream of doing so by putting a representation of claim into an envelope and mailing it out. . .

 

2nd Class.

 

That is just so, so cheap.

 

And, of course, so so. . . impractical.

 

The reason why it's impractical is because there's no proof of delivery.

 

A law firm resorting to such cheapness cannot know, and the law firm's client cannot know, if so important a letter ever got where it was destined or was ever received and read by the person against whom possible legal action was intended.

 

So what you need to do now is this. Put the letter in a safe place and. .

 

Do absolutely nothing else.

 

Do not reply.

Do not react.

Do not in any way shape or form. . . Respond.

 

Instead. . . sit back, get on with your life, and if another letter arrives -- and it has to be either a Signed For, or a Special Delivery -- then and only then should you think -- note the word: "think" -- of responding.

 

As you might appreciate, many people here and elsewhere will find it difficult to believe that a law firm as professional and prestigious as ACS:Law of 20 Hanover Square, Mayfair, London, cannot afford the price of even a First Class stamp.

 

Many people will find it difficult to believe that a law firm as professional and prestigious as ACS:Law is incapable of understanding the difference between a cheapo-cheapo mail-shot and an important legal document despatch:

 

'Now then, Flyyyte me boyo, where's the proof you've obviously got of this here letter which you say you sent but which you claim the defendant wilfully ignored?" and I say:

 

"Ah, well, m'lud, we always sends out all our important legal stuff by 2nd Class Mail."

 

Laughter, as they say, in Court.

 

And not much chance in the wake of that of me jacking up my fee income, or expanding my billable hours, not when prospective clients look at my practice and think ohmigawd, there goes Mister Second Class Stamp Man.

 

So, yes.

 

I really am finding it hard to accept that Andrew Crossley would ever send anything out by 2nd Class Mail, other than a Christmas card.

 

That being so, shome confusion obviously exists shomewhere, so as noted above, do not reply, respond or react in any way, and keep this weird untrackable and highly loseable-in-transit 2nd Class mailing safe.

 

You never know: it might possibly play a future role in the gradual unfolding of Justice in the matter of ACS:Law, Andrew Crossley, and, er, piracy, intellectual property theft, and the media representation of Dubai beach bonkers.

 

 

Flyyyte

Link to post
Share on other sites

Found an interesting link....

 

Mmmmm Terence Tsang (Tezimondo) on Twitter

 

http://sites.google.com/site/acsillegalsite/home/the-players

 

Terran

 

EDIT Also - if this is the same person according to the above link................

 

autoadvan.co.uk

 

Registrant:

Auto Advan

 

Registrant type:

Unknown

 

Registrant's address:

11 rupert law close

quorn

UK

LE12 8PE

United Kingdom

 

Registrar:

Key-Systems GmbH [Tag = KEY-SYSTEMS-DE]

URL: http://www.Key-Systems.net

 

Relevant dates:

Registered on: 17-Jun-2003

Renewal date: 17-Jun-2011

Last updated: 21-Jul-2009

 

Registration status:

Registered until renewal date.

 

Name servers:

ns1.domainservice.com

ns2.domainservice.com

ns3.domainservice.com

ns4.domainservice.com

 

Disclaimer

WHOIS lookup made at 23:55:52 02-Feb-2010

 

--

This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry

for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

 

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2010.

 

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted

by the terms of use available in full at http://www.nominet.org.uk/whois, which

includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its

repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing

or hiding any or all of this notice and © exceeding query rate or volume

limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the

register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

 

Unfortuntly the admin person there 'Tez' left all his car data there which means it could be cloned as the reg is also displayed ... FH53CHY

 

Vehicle 2003 Nissan 350Z

Colour Silver

Updated Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:47

Mileage 5400

Purchased Price 22950 GBP

Total Mods 4

Total Spent 2100 GBP

Total Views 2080

Rating 68/150

Please Rate

Description 2003 T Version - Japanese Luxury model

0 ? 60mph in 5.9 secs

Convertible

6 Speed manual

Fully loaded

 

I'm selling this vehicle! If you are interested please send us an email =) It's in the UK, registered, ready to be driven away!

Guestbook ( 248 Total Comments )

: Hi!!! good page ! http://mypharmaphen.50webs.com/viagra-herbal-prescriptio...

: Hello! really great site. http://phermen.atspace.com/viagra-generic-dose/v...

: Hi ! good site. http://phermen.atspace.com/viagra-herbal-online/viagra-her...

: Really great page. Thanks!!! http://phermen.atspace.com/discount-viagra-he...

:

 

Not doing any more now.... hopefully you guys can see how easy it is to find information - freely available information which means your not breaking any laws etc - on any subject.... in fact some one I know proved that by doing some thing simualr to me lol.

 

On a serious note I am hacked off by all this and I am looking forward to a) out come of all the agency's and media now taking an interest b) the SRA out come slow it may be c) the governments involvement as I believe it pees over the genuine intentions the new digital bill is bringing by creating nothing but distrust from the public in methods of real term identification of perpatrtors.

 

T

Edited by ccsnet
ACS:Law Dont Accept Photos But I Unfortuntly Admit To Owning The CD :|
Link to post
Share on other sites

A sudden thought. ACS:law are aparently acting on behalf of digiprotect and are asking for settlement as I aparently uploaded 'one' song. The song was on a 3cd album with many other songs and artists etc. Surely digiprotect cant represent every artist on that album?!?!?

 

If they've been connecting to torrents and/or seeding uploads to track IP's, does that mean they have breached the copyright on all the other artists tracks at the same time?

 

I'm a bit vague about all this stuff, but is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sudden thought. ACS:law are aparently acting on behalf of digiprotect and are asking for settlement as I aparently uploaded 'one' song. The song was on a 3cd album with many other songs and artists etc. Surely digiprotect cant represent every artist on that album?!?!?

 

If they've been connecting to torrents and/or seeding uploads to track IP's, does that mean they have breached the copyright on all the other artists tracks at the same time?

 

I'm a bit vague about all this stuff, but is that correct?

 

Theoretically speaking would it not be some form of entrapment if they seed the files, someone subsequently downloads them and then they try and prosecute you for it? - Just a thought...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theoretically speaking would it not be some form of entrapment if they seed the files, someone subsequently downloads them and then they try and prosecute you for it? - Just a thought...

 

 

Entrapment is not a concept in British law, and the only thing that comes close are rules which govern how agents of the state behave. Digiprotect are not agents of the state and this is a civil matter so those rules don't apply.

 

You could argue that if they distribute the files they give implied licence, which is similar to what you're getting at but there is zero evidence that this has happened in this case. They simply don't need to.

Edited by IdaInFife
removed external links
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I would note that all of this takes place in the ground floor reception. At no point do i see the offices. 20 Hanover Sq, whilst a prestigious address on paper, is not in the flesh.

 

The simple answer is they do NOT have an office as such. As has been communicated many times on the Net, ACS Law have a registered address only where mail can be sent and collected from. Saves on overheads no doubt and gives the impression of a credible organisation. I suspect the reason you got short thrift when you turned up is that no ACS Law people were on site and no one from another company there wanted to collect the letter.

 

LA Law it ain't! LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

A sudden thought. ACS:law are aparently acting on behalf of digiprotect and are asking for settlement as I aparently uploaded 'one' song. The song was on a 3cd album with many other songs and artists etc. Surely digiprotect cant represent every artist on that album?!?!?

 

They aren't. Digiprotect are only interested in the songs and artists they represent, so they will 'ignore' the rest of the album and concentrate on their own items only. For example, they represent the artist "Scooter", so on a compilation album, they will track all the data and pick out and concentrate on Scooter tracks only.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Flyyyte, thank you very much for the reply ive put the letter in a safe place and am not going to think about it anymore cheers i ow you a beer :)

 

Scooby, I'm afraid Flyyte is dead wrong. All sorts of organisations send out all sorts of correspondence second class and they assume, since the royal mail delivery rate is very high, that you received the document. Cheap it may be, but it's not unreasonable or unusual.

 

Court claims have to be sent first class, or by another method which gets there the next working day, to be counted as being served (according to Rule 6.3 of the CPR) but these aren't court documents. This is a pre action letter of claim according to the Civil proceedure rules.

 

According to section 7 of those rules, you should reply to the letter. Now, of course, these rules aren't compulsory but in the INCREDIBLY unlikley event of it ever getting to court, poor pre action conduct could count against you.

 

 

 

Sorry, mods I will stop spamming now. I need to get some work done.

Edited by IdaInFife
removed external links
Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with you pen that it's a dangerous game to play and ignorance is no defence to the law. It could send out a message to ACS Law that the person is ignoring a serious matter and they could apply for a judgment by default.

 

I personally haven't received one of these letters, but work in a similar enviroment (IT legal). If I did I would send a single letter of denial and advise them that I do not propose to enter into any further correspondance.

 

ACS Law know that their evidence is untested in UK Law and run a 50/50 chance of getting a result and thus setting a precedence. They will probably continue to milk the market whilst it proves profitable. If (and it's a big if) they do choose to test a case in Court they will carefully pick and choose their defendant to maximise the chance of success without turning them into a victim.

 

Just my personal thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so what should i do write a letter of denial and see what happens

 

What you do is up to you, but there is a lot of help in the links I have posted above.

 

I won't spam them again, it's getting a little repetitive and I don't want the mods to get annoyed :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so what should i do write a letter of denial and see what happens

 

Check out the excellent beingthreatened website and get as much legal advice as possible. Most Solicitors will give you a free half-hour, Citizens Advice Bureau is free, most insurance policies (car, house) come with legal advice for small cost if not free. No one on here or at beingthreatened (as far as I am aware) are solicitors or of the like, so you need to get proper independant advice, but it all helps understand the "process".

 

If it was me and I was innocent, I'd not pay for something I didn't do. I'd write a single firm, but immotive letter of denial, stating that I do not admit the claim, will not be paying for something I hadn't done and have no knowledge of anyone who could have done the claimed offence. I'd also tell them that I will not be entering into any further correspondance on the matter as I had made my position clear. This gives ACS Law the option of taking you to Court or dropping the matter, or further correspondance could be considered harrassment. It also closes the avenue of suggesting that some else on a possible wireless network doing the deed, etc.

 

Just my opinion and as stated seek independant legal advice. There is good legal advice out there for free.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i too have one of these letters accusing me of a file i have never heard of let alone have on my pc! (done a full scan and search)

 

i think the whole thing is a disgrace and something needs to be done, i feel stressed with this and its costing me money at work searching for info/help on these guys!

 

I will be writing a firm LOD, when will something be done or are they going to get away with doing this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i too have one of these letters accusing me of a file i have never heard of let alone have on my pc! (done a full scan and search)

 

i think the whole thing is a disgrace and something needs to be done, i feel stressed with this and its costing me money at work searching for info/help on these guys!

 

I will be writing a firm LOD, when will something be done or are they going to get away with doing this!

 

The digital economy bill is currently passing through the house of lords and ACS have been mentioned several times. See a previously post of mine for more information on how to write to a Lord and let them know your vies on the matter. If you click my user name you should be able to get to a list of all my posts. I shan't repost the post as I'm starting to feel like a right spammer :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The digital economy bill is currently passing through the house of lords and ACS have been mentioned several times. See a previously post of mine for more information on how to write to a Lord and let them know your vies on the matter. If you click my user name you should be able to get to a list of all my posts. I shan't repost the post as I'm starting to feel like a right spammer :)

 

many thanks pen, iv read thorugh some of your posts and dont stop! keep it going keep up the pressure

 

Its not enough them mentioning it, they need to do something about it :(

 

did you receive one of these letters yourself? what stage are you at?

 

Also scooby555 check your pm box

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there new to this site i recived 1 of theses letters on friday

am kinda worryed about it

i recived it from acs:law the guys name is andrew j crossley apartly i uploaded a file on the 8.1.2009 and ive just reviced this letter now is this a [problem] what do i do now i cant afford to pay £400

You need to read the whole thread, there's more than enough information in it. Don't worry about it though as i believe ACS law are due for a fall!

:rolleyes:
Link to post
Share on other sites

What we all need to remember that in law ACS aren't doing anything illegal.

 

Sure they are sailing very close to the wind, but they are also no mugs and know the law. Your ordinary punter doesn't and some panic and pay up innocent or not. There is no test case that ACS can refer to, nor is there one that opponents to ACS can refer to either.

 

All ACS are doing is exploiting the weak and ignorant into paying a sum that they say is reasonable. Unless there is a change in the law (like there was for ambulance chasing firms) then until the gravy train dries up they will continue to send letters before moving onto another venture.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm going to citizens advice on friday id have gone today but roads are coverd in ice and snow so fingers crossed , i'm also taking a print out of some of the information regarding ACS:law and hopefully they can advice or do somthing about this. ive just lost my job and cant afford this sort of payment for somthing i have apartly done a year ago which is rather and totaly unfair

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck, just remember to not give away anything personal on the net. If the worst comes to the worse (and history shows that ACS don't prosecute normally), then you'll be means tested. Chances are it would add to the likelihood of ACS backing out taking legal action as they want their large cut now, not at a £1 a Week for the next 10 years or so LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4937 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...