Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You typed it in? actually typed it all out? if so, maybe you took too long or something, like session timed out. Does the status show defence filed or no change?
    • Hi just typed all defence clicked next and it's deleted all. Any help
    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
    • What makes you say that?  I have no idea how I would go about that or why they would even entertain discussions now that they've won the Court case
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have recieved advice from my solicitor to settle with them, it's not sitting right with me tho :-|

 

Don't then. Have a read of the last post by car2403.

 

It is not apparently unknown according to posts I have read ozzymos, for people to make similar posts to yours, who may be connected to ACS:law.

 

What Solicitor of any calibre is going to recommend paying these people, when there are points of law, which require further exploration ?

 

I suggest that if you have not downloaded the copyrighted material, you are alleged to have, that you just send them the letter of denial. It is up to ACS to prove that you breached copyright and not for youto provide contrary evidence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Thing is that I did download the file, after hearing this the solicitor said he didn't think it was wise to argue against it if I had in fact done what they accused me of. Feel like I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, I know their evidence is flimsy to say the best, but do I risk sending a LOD only for them to produce some more evidence later that they havent yet revealed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

posted my letter of denial today. read the persons thread who was advised by solicitor to pay up....DONT! even if you did do it they could never prove it and would not go so far as taking you to court. Just write a simple letter of denial. State at the end you will not be writing to them again. the one letter is enough. Everyone should report Gallant Macmillan to the SRA and anyone else they can think of complaining to. These people are causing a lot of people unneeded stress. [EDIT]

Edited by alanfromderby
Please refrain from posting comments which may be read as threatening.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is that I did download the file, after hearing this the solicitor said he didn't think it was wise to argue against it if I had in fact done what they accused me of. Feel like I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, I know their evidence is flimsy to say the best, but do I risk sending a LOD only for them to produce some more evidence later that they havent yet revealed?

 

Ok then, don't send them any letter of denial. If you want to send them a letter, just ask them to reveal any proof that they have, so that you can look into the matter further. In that way, you are not saying that you do or don't know anything about this. Asking for proof is quite reasonable.

 

Ask yourself this question. If this firm of solicitors have sent thousands of letters out, why would they pick on you to take to court, when they haven't apparently taken any other person to court so far? Are you really that unlucky.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is that I did download the file, after hearing this the solicitor said he didn't think it was wise to argue against it if I had in fact done what they accused me of. Feel like I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, I know their evidence is flimsy to say the best, but do I risk sending a LOD only for them to produce some more evidence later that they havent yet revealed?

 

I thought these cases were supposed to be about 'uploading' this file, sharing it, not downloading it?

 

In fact, why would any solicitor advise you to pay up so much money for downloading a single file? I can't imagine any solicitor would agree that is a fair sum in damages for downloading a single file. I'd go back and ask him to explain himself as all you have done is admit to downloading which is a lot different to the letters everyone else has recieved. Everyone else has had letters asking about file sharing, uploading NOT downloading.

Edited by kilotango22
Had another thought.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have recieved advice from my solicitor to settle with them, it's not sitting right with me tho :-|

 

Jeez, what a dumb solicitor, sack him !...whilst I have not had dealing with ACS I have recentlyn received a CPR Part36 offering to settle about a ground rent/leaserhold dispute, I ignored it (and the various threats from my landlords solicitors), I had my day in court and they totally lost and I came away a grand happier :).

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not a lawyer and Unlike yourself TudorBlue / OzzyMos, i did not download the file - and the accused on the letter i have did not also.

 

You two unfortunately are a focus. Yet you need to sit tight, as the evidence they have used to find you out is the same evidence they have used to accuse innocent people....... there is no logic in how they have managed to do that. If this is the case then something is unlawful - but beyond my knowledge -

 

i cant tell you how to respond. Luckily its a civil matter, not a criminal.

 

IF you do go for a settlement, make sure that its a FINAL settlement of all allegations to prevent those 'floodgates'. As i too feel those caught will be sent more. Just a paranoid feeling.

 

Also.... yes you got caught... ouch, and unfair. in UK id happily abide by the 3 strike rule. But the price to pay? F*CK A DUCK! Do not pay it.

 

Your solicitor is probably inexperienced in the matter, along with a LOT of others. If you are looking for a settlement, then find a lawful way to renegotiate the costs of the settlement, because they are for one, absolutely extortionate to the real loss.

 

Request the evidence that you uploaded the song, request the amount you uploaded, request how much you uploaded and to how many peers. Theres so much more evidence they need to prove.

 

a LOD will filter you into the queue with us but i dont knwo how far it can get you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

QC's view raises doubt on online piracy cases - Which? News

 

Another nail in the coffin for ACS Law. Confirming what's been said on this forum. And the SRA investigation meant to wind up at the end of this month?

 

I think there will be more and more demands getting sent out in the next few weeks, now. He'll be trying desperately to make some money while the sun still shines. I believe there's just been an NPO for 15 000 names? and I beleve also that the BT customer names from the NPO releasing 25 000 names in November 2009 have yet to be released? 12 000 names?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is that I did download the file, after hearing this the solicitor said he didn't think it was wise to argue against it if I had in fact done what they accused me of. Feel like I'm stuck between a rock and a hard place, I know their evidence is flimsy to say the best, but do I risk sending a LOD only for them to produce some more evidence later that they havent yet revealed?

 

Ozzy was the letter addressed to you, are you accused?

Are you sure you did it and not someone else using your computer? ie a friends son or you had a party and loads of people were using the PC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My sons girlfriend has just received a letter from these clowns demanding £295 from her for downloading a file with one song! It came with an a4 sheet with high court stamps on it. The accompanying paperwork had her I.P. add, on and her I.P.

I knew I had seen something about ACS Law on CAG.

I've told her to ignore it and not to acknowledge anything, not even write.

From what I've read on here this is probably the best thing to do, right???

jed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've told her to ignore it and not to acknowledge anything, not even write.

From what I've read on here this is probably the best thing to do, right???

jed

 

haha, you havnt read a lot then. :p;)

 

Thats the worst thing you can do. With innocence you need to be focusing on a Letter Of Defence / Denial - not sure what the D is again.

 

They will be harassing her, they will send more, but with a LOD its more in her favour than theirs when it comes to the Ping pong letters. ( stop replying and start repeating and referring to the first defence letter if it gets over 3 letters ) and by all means there is no lawful way they can get you to reply to these 'questionairres' .

Edited by Mattyhatty
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ozzy was the letter addressed to you, are you accused?

Are you sure you did it and not someone else using your computer? ie a friends son or you had a party and loads of people were using the PC?

 

 

haha i see where youre going with that one :p:D:rolleyes:

 

but becareful we wont want ACS : BORE to send you ANOTHER letter for perverting the course of justice haaaa :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to sit down later tonight and write a letter to ACS and tell them I know nothing about the the download. I have even thought of saying that I already own the said piece of work but my daughter downlooaded it because she couldnt not rip it to her itunes and thought because she owned the said peice of workm, that it was ok to download. What should I go with guys? What should I put in the letter??

 

Don't give them any info to come back at you with. Use the lod template and leave it at that mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Referring to the LOD, you do not put any information regarding whos in the house, who uses what and how they use it.

 

its you V them. So they have no need to know about any one else in the house. You also dont admit to downloading, as the issue is uploading. which is where copyright laws slam you. So they dont need to know about that either.

 

Keep it simple. Keep it minimal. All they want is more to judge you by because they have NOTHING to begin with. Your reply will be where the find their first bit of evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ozzymos

 

I smell a rat. You come on here and post that you have been advised by a solicitor to pay up and now just add a link to a newspaper article.

 

The advice stands that you don't pay until they come forward with proof, that a copyright offence has been commited, which is sufficient to be tested in a court.

 

Have you read that some copyright owners have been found to have deliberately added files to internet sites, so that they can run a speculative invoicing scheme through a firm of solicitors. I am not saying this has happened in this case, but this is something you should be aware of.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted a link from The Guardian, not a random site that I, "a rat", have created. I'm just trying to share as much information as possible, and to show this issue is making mainstream news. The article doesn't tell people to pay up, and it could be viewed as arguing against that.

 

It's all very well people giving advice to strangers not to pay up, but when your the one who has actually been accused, and stands to lose a lot if things go wrong, it puts things in a different light. The point I was trying to make in a previous post was that Gallant Macmillan (and Ministry of Sound) are new to this racket, none of us know how far (if at all) they are willing to go.

 

And for the record, Lawdit, who people on this site have recommended for these cases, also recommend to pay up if you have in fact committed the infringement.

 

What to do when you receive a letter of claim - Copyright Law Articles and News - Lawdit Reading Room

 

"(4) If you have downloaded the said work it may be an option to pay up. If you deny the claim now, and further along down the line the other side prove that you have downloaded the said work, you will be liable for a substantial amount of money (mainly due to the other side claiming their solicitors costs for dealing with this matter from you, which can rack up to thousands of pounds). It may be easier to get rid of this at this early stage while the other side are willing to settle for a relatively low sum of money. "

 

I'm not trying to cause an argument, I totally agree that people should not pay if they have not downloaded and uploaded the work, but for others like me, it's not as crystal clear what the right course of action is.

 

Regarding the copyright owners deliberately adding the files to the internet, I agree surely there has to be an element of truth to that. If not directly, then surely they have given permission to the solicitors to do this? Does anyone have a working knowledge of how the tracking system works, would something have needed to be implanted into the file for them to harvest our ip addresses? If that is the case, then would Ministry of Sound (or Gallant Macmillan) be the one's legally responsible for initially sharing the copyrighted work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what do yopu suggest would be my best course of action?

 

See a solicitor, one who's experienced with Intellectual Property cases. I'm not qualified to tell you what to do, I'm just really confused and stressed out by this whole thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice is to just send a letter saying. Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx. In order that I may look into this further and obtain appropriate advice, please forward full proof to back up this allegation.

 

Leave it at that. If they want to take this further, then they will have to come back

 

Think logically, if this is just one file, they are unlikely to go after the owner of the IP address. They would probably prefer to go after someone, who had repeatedly breached copyright, where there was more evidence to support them.

 

At the moment the legal system in this country makes it very difficult for them to go to court. I have seen no reports of any pending actions.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

See a solicitor, one who's experienced with Intellectual Property cases. I'm not qualified to tell you what to do, I'm just really confused and stressed out by this whole thing.

 

Even then you are unlikely to get a full answer, this area of the law is pretty much untested.

 

An I.Property lawyer may be very smart of the details of I.Property, but he is unlikely to know about the complexities of IP addresses, wifi hacking, spoof addresses, torrent streams, P2P, deep packet inspection, etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4978 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...