Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit Card company could not supply a copy of signed agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5253 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, have been recommended this site by a friend and is my first post so any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

The title of this post pretty much says it all.

 

I sent my Credit Card Company one of the 'standard' letters requesting a copy of my signed agreement and all they've sent me is 2 copies of the Terms and Conditions which have not been signed by me.

 

Also in their letter they state that according to the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 they can omit to provide any signature box, signature or date of signature.

 

Can anyone tell me what to do now and where I stand legally.

 

I'm sure there are threads on here on this very subject but my eyes went square trying to locate something.

 

Await your kind comments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be tempted to send them Scots letter below & see what their response is;

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me, the contents of which are noted. I appreciate your quick response to my original letter. However, the reply received by me does not fulfil your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I be supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter.

 

My request remains outstanding. The items you sent in your reply, does not constitute a true copy of any credit agreement that may or may not have been signed by me on the opening of this account. It neither confirms that I am liable for any alleged debt to you, nor gives me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’.

 

I still require you to send me a true copy of the original credit agreement that you allege exists. As you will know, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, a judge is not permitted to make any enforcement order unless the creditor can provide a true signed copy of the original credit agreement. This means that unless you can produce such an agreement, this alleged debt is not enforceable in law.

 

You had until XX/XX/2008 to provide me with the true copy I requested. You are now in default of my request. Any account I hold with you is now in legal dispute. Whilst the account remains in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for any payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest on the account, nor make any further charges to the account. Additionally, you are not entitled to register any information on this account with any credit reference agency.

 

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must have written consent from the customer to collate and share such information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement, so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

 

The requirement for consent to share data is a clear requirement of the Data Protection Act 1998. any such attempts to share my data without my consent will be met with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office

 

To sum up, I will not be making any further payments to you until you provide me with the document I have requested. Whilst you remain in default of my request, you are not permitted to take any action against this account. This includes adding further charges and passing any information to the credit reference agencies.

 

Should you not have any signed credit agreement in relation to this alleged debt, please confirm this in writing to me.

 

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

cerberusalert, many thanks for your quick and thorough response.

 

I see that I have to stop payments which gets me worried a bit. I know the agreement is in dispute but what would happen after I send this letter and they can't supply a copy of the signed agreement? They're not just going to let this matter go are they? Ultimately am I going to end up in court, of which money to defend myself being in short supply?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The option to stop payments is entirely yours, but if you continue to pay you are hardly disputing it.

 

Even if they did take you to court, you could bring them to 'Strict Proof' which means they would have to produce the original signed copy of the agreement. It is extremely rare for a credit card company to take someone to court, generally they will send you a default notice, close your account and sell it to a DCA & then claim tax relief. A lot of companies make an error when they serve a DN which in effect negates any claim they have for the full amount owed they can only claim for the arrears up to the default. That can be dealt with if & when it happens.

 

After the DCA has bought the debt they will start chasing you for payment. They can be dealt with easily enough & in most cases in the absence of a CCA they will drop their activities like a hot potato & pass it back to the original creditor.

 

So as you see, any court case although unlikely would be a long way off anyway and completely defendable. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hi All,

 

Halifax have engaged a company called Power2Contact Ltd to try and rebuild my relationship with Halifax as I have 'lost' contact with them.

 

But the thing is I haven't lost contact as I have written to them many times. I think its because I ignore all their telephone calls!!:grin:

 

Anyway, my question is, has anyone heard or been in contact with this company?

 

Also in their letter they say that if I do not get in contact with Halifax within 3 working days then they will instruct one of their Contact Managers to visit me at home.

 

Would appreciate some guidance.

 

For the record, Halifax have failed to to supply fully signed CCA's for the 2 accounts I have with them following my SAR a few month ago.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Power 2 Contact should be reported to the OFT, as should Halifax, as you have proof you have written to them they should not have set their own tracing agents onto you.

 

Report both companies also to Trading Standards.

 

Thanks for the advice sillygirl1, I assume the OFT website has a complaints procedure on it? And do I tell both of them that I am reporting them to the OFT?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company, Power2contact and Credit solutions ltd all part of credit Solutions Holding Ltd run by Mr William Hugh Pierce has been referred to the OFT for investigation.

 

Report them on

 

08454 040506 for trading standards.

 

Thanks Kurvaface, will get on to it but should I tell them that I'm reporting them as I don't want a visit from one of their 'Contact' Managers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This company, Power2contact and Credit solutions ltd all part of credit Solutions Holding Ltd run by Mr William Hugh Pierce has been referred to the OFT for investigation.

 

Report them on

 

08454 040506 for trading standards.

 

Have just reported them to the OFT, first time I've done this and found it very straightforward, they were very helpful indeed. Was told that if anyone does turn up from Power2Contact then I can report them to the police for trespass!! Hope this is of use to anybody else on the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...