Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West - celebrate! - I think!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When I checked my credit file yesterday to look fior the start date of one of my cards, I noticed that my debt balance had gone down.

 

So I counted up the number of credit cards and found one missing.

 

So i checked them off -and found - that my Nat West Visa card has gone! Best part of £10k including all the extra interest and charges they have put on :)

 

I haven't heard anything from them at all, though someone I know had this happen with one of her cards.

 

Anyone else had this? Is that it? Can I file this one away now as a success?

 

Thanks

 

JK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Took it out Jan 2002.

 

I CCA'd them and never had anything back except standard T&C sheet

 

few stroppy letters saying they had sent me all they needed to send me....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interestingly this bunch are still chasing me for the debt even though it now doesn't exist.

 

I had a letter from Triton not long after which I assumed just came because they were slow updating records. Today I have a letter from green & Co which i might post up late if I have time, its funny.

 

Interesting from letterheads that Triton are a part of RBS and Green & Co ar "the practising name of solicitors emplotyed by the Royal bank of scotland group"

 

I am not taking any notice of the letter I just wondered does anyone know re Credit File, once it's off presumably its off, they cant reinstate it later?

 

(There was never any response to CCA except standard T&C)

Link to post
Share on other sites

When this happens it usually means they've sold it on or are about to. No doubt a DCA will contact you in the near future. At that time just point out to them that as NatWest failed in their obligation to provide you with a copy of a signed agreement you would suggest that they pass it back to them as you consider this to be harassment and as such will be reported to OFT.

 

I would send this letter to Green & Co.

 

I refer to your letter of xxx received xxxxxx

 

Frankly, I am surprised of the need to remind a firm of Solicitors about terms and conditions surrounding my requests to your client for a true copy of my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act 1974); received by NatWest on xxxxxxxxxx. I can only assume therefore that they failed to inform you that the above account is in dispute.

 

Should your clients now persist with threats of legal action, I will welcome the opportunity for a judge to look at several offences committed by NatWest under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, as well as your client's non-compliance with and total disregard for the law on this occasion.

 

yf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So when they sell it on do they take it off the credit file?

 

Sorry for my ignorance, I've not had this happen before.

 

there is no CCA so they can sell to who they like!!

 

Would have been nice to be able to stop doing letters on one of them though.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they take it off your file thats what makes me think they are about to sell or have. Unfortunately, because there is no agreement doesn't mean that the debt doesn't exist. Unless the debt is actually written off you can be chased for this for at least six years from when you last acknowledged it. After six years it becomes statute barred and thats when the lowlife start buying and chasing and hope you don't know your rights. There are cases where caggers have been taken to court and lost even though there was no signed agreement. Just depends on the Judge's knowledge on the day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...