Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later the your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. So if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place and park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and then unload the children followed by reloading the children getting seat belts on etc before driving to the exit stopping for cars, pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
    • New version after LFI's superb analysis of the contract. Sorry, but you need to redo the numbering of the paras and of the exhibits in the right order after all the damage I've caused! Defendant's WS - version 4.pdf
    • Hi  no nothing yet. Hope it stays that way 😬
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax claimform for 'preference' account credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5508 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Thanks to all the help on here I found this version of the CPR 31.14 Request letter earlier today and have adapted it to suit my County Court Claim.... I think.

 

The CCC is from 'Collections and Recoveries' for the bank so can somebody check that my letter is correctly written please?

 

Here it is:

removed as we have a template now -dx

If someone who knows could run their eyes over this and make any corrections for me, I can send it off tomorrow by Recorded Delivery.

 

 

Thank you.

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be happy to approve it but can you let us know what the POC's are (Particulars Of The Claim) sometimes they are non existant in which case it might be good to send off the CPR18....but 1st things first...(POC's)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42 Man, I changed my username as the other one was too obvious...

 

I haven't got it in front of me as at work today but as far as I can recall it states something about being a debt owed by me for a credit card agreement that I have stopped paying and it mentions me ignoring a Default Notice.

 

This was originally a loan I took out in 1999 that they changed to a debit card account that had extra credit on. Over the years I paid it off and then they would offer me it again and when the times were lean, I stupidly used it again. Anyway, long story short, the credit limit kept going up and I now am in this hole.

 

They have definitely never sent me a DN - I received several statements, a couple of letters from solicitors and then this CCC.

 

This is why in my letter I am asking for the original agreement and the DN.

 

I'm all over the shop now as my partner is really worried that we're going to lose our house and although I'm not too worried, I am feeling stressed about making sure I do everything properly.

 

As you know, I'm also dealing with the SD on my other thread.

Tonight, I will post up a copy of the CCC but I think I have summized it ok.

 

Thank you for your support and as always, your intelligent help.

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is def the OC. the Claimant is OC and the correspondence address is their Collections Dept.

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning 42 Man, Sorry couldn't post last night as called over to in-laws - mother is still quite poorly and father (85) is disabled...

 

Anyway POC:

 

The Claimants claim is for [just over £4k] presently due pursuant to a credit agreement entered into by the parties, full particulars of which have been supplied hitherto.

By an agreement dated 03/02/1999 the Defendant has an account number XXXXXXXXX with the claimant. The defendant has failed or delayed to adhere to the terms of the Default Notice issued by the Claimant under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The balance due as at XX/XX/2009 on said account is £XXXX

 

The Claimant is the Bank.

 

The address for sending documents is at a different address but doesn't name any DCA or Solicitors... so I'm assuming it is their own department?

 

The CCC was issued out of Northampton County court.

 

Hope this is all the info you require - I'm working from home today to try and get some of these things sorted out as can't sleep with all of these things going on in my head.

 

I'll keep checking in but hopefully I'll be able to get this off in the post today?

 

Thank you for all your help.

 

Fdpm

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thank you 42Man - You're the best!

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie, in the letter it states I have acknowledged the CCC - but it has been suggested to not do that until later... should I send off the acknowledgement today as well?

:confused:

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42Man,

 

When you get a chance, please could you give me some help in preparing my defence?

 

Thank you

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Have sent two letters under CPR31.14 now, one dated 21/04/09 and sent Recorded Delivery and second sent 30/04/09 Recorded.

 

This gives them until 7th to respond.

 

1. What do I do next?

2. The original CC is dated 17 April so I calculated that I have until 20 May to submit my defence?

 

If someone could give me some more advice I would be grateful.

 

Thank you

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the N244 thing... where can I find this form and where do I send/take it? I do read through the threads you suggest but there is rather a lot to take in and I only have a limited time to do research as trying to look after aged parents. Today I have about an hour to do research and get prepared for next stage.

 

I have copied the defences you suggested and will read through at bedtime, but if I need to send the N244 I would appreciate some advice regards this.

 

Thank you

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could apply for the N244 order either before or at the same time as you submit your defence (fee applicable but reclaimable if all goes in your favour) or you could use draft directions to request the court to order the production of the docs as part of your defence submissions. There is no fee payable for this but there is also no guarantee that a DJ will accept your draft directions. IMO I would be tempted to use N244.

 

The Form 244 is here: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_e.pdf

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI FG and thank you!

 

I have looked throught the threads and found a couple of them with this form filled in so I guess I'll copy one of them? NO word from the other side yet in response to my CPR letters but they do have until Thursday.

 

One other quickie - I think I have until 15th to get my defence in - if I use the online thingy and do it on 14th, that should be okay? We get 8000 characters.

 

I think I have seen elsewhere on here that we have 33 days but according to the online thing its 28 days.

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends what you are going to write in your defence - 8000 words doesn't go very far.

 

If it says you have until 15th to submit your defence, that is the date you have to comply with. Submission online on 14th is fine but if you have to mail, send Spec. Del. (not rec, it's not reliable).

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am extremely confused - I think I've read too many threads!

 

Today I got a reply to my first CPR letter:

 

 

DATED 30 April 2009

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

We write with regards to your letter of 20 April 2009.

We acknowledge receipt of your request and confirm we are in the process of collating the documentation.

The documentation shall be forwarded to you once we have received.

Yours faithfully

 

Does this mean I need to give them more time or can I still go ahead with form N244 if I haven't received anything by this Thursday?

 

HELP please!

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I found this and can someone tell me if it is correct for me to send this in a form N244 on Thursday 7th May if I have not received anything from the claimant?

box [3] of the N244 write:

 

'An order extending time for service of the Defence and directing that unless within 14 days of the making of an order upon this application the Claimant complies with requests made by the Defendant on 20 April 2009 and 30 April 2009 pursuant to CPR 31.14 by the provision to the Defendant of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim, namely [1] the agreement [2] the default notice, the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty to enter judgment against the Claimant without further order of the court with the costs of this case to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

 

The application is made because of the Claimant's refusal to comply with the Defendant's CPR 31.14 request and the documents are required owing to [not sure what to put here????] and to enable the proper preparation of a Defence.'

 

In Box 4 write: 'Yes'

In Box 5 write: 'Without a hearing'

Ignore Box 6

In Box 7 write: 'None'

In Box 8 write: 'District Judge'

In Box 9 write: 'Claimant'

In Box 10 tick the box marked 'the evidence set out in the box below' and beneath it write:

 

'On 21 April 2009, following service of the Claim Form in this case, I wrote to the Claimant requesting inspection of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim pursuant to CPR 31.14. A copy of my letter of request is attached to this application notice marked 'A'.

As I had received no reply by 28 April 2009, I wrote again requesting inspection of documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim pursuant to CPR 31.14. A copy of my letter of request is attached to this application notice marked ‘B’. The Claimant replied by letter dated 30 April 2009 acknowledging receipt and advising documentation would be sent but with no indication of when this would be. A copy of this reply is attached to this application notice marked 'C'

 

The agreement relied upon by the Claimant is now very old. The documents sought by my request are essential for the proper preparation of my defence and the determination of the claim and CPR 31.14 afford me a right to inspect those documents.'

 

I would really appreciate some help please

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be seen by the court as being reasonable so my inclination would be to hold off on the N244 for the time being. However I would write to sols. acknowledging their reply & generously offering them an extension of time to the 13 May but warning them that non-production by that date will result in your application to the court for an order to ensure their compliance. You then have the option to include their non-compliance in your defence &/or issue N244 & look sweetness itself :)

 

If you're not sure, PM 42man & ask him to look this over - his advice is always invaluable.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is largely the work of i've got no money. However, you do need to understand what is being said

 

In the xxx County Court

Claim number xxxx

Between

xxxxxxxxxxx- Claimant

 

and

 

FDPM - Defendant

 

DEFENCE

 

 

1) The claim as pleaded does not contain sufficient particulars to permit me to file a properly particularised and pleaded defence. Further, no documents supporting the claim in the particulars have been offered. I have made a request for disclosure, pursuant to Part 31 of the Civil Procedure Rules, to the Claimant to allow me to properly respond to the claim. The Claimant has failed to respond to the Part 31 request.

 

2) It is Not admitted that I signed any agreement with XXXX . If, which is not admitted, such an agreement exists the precise terms and date of any such agreement are not admitted. I do not have in my possession any such agreement and am not therefore able to comment thereon. The Claimant is put to strict proof as to the date and terms of such agreement.

 

3) It is averred that if any agreement did exist that the aforesaid agreement would be a regulated agreement within the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ("the Act"). It is not admitted that any alleged Agreement is enforceable within the terms of the Act. As I do not have a copy of the said agreement the Claimant is put to strict proof that the aforesaid agreement was properly executed and has been enforceable at all times since its’ inception.

 

4) I have no knowledge of the service of a default notice. The claimant is put to strict proof as to the content and service of any such alleged default notice.

5) Further and in the alternative it is not admitted that the sum claimed is lawfully owing. The Claimant is put to strict proof as to how the sum claimed has been calculated and as to how it is asserted that the sum claimed is contractually owing.

 

6) Further and in any event in view of the failure to comply with the CPR Part 31 request it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to costs as claimed.

 

7) In view of the above, it is denied that I am indebted to the Claimant as alleged or at all.

Statement of Truth

I believe that the facts stated in this defence are true.

 

Signed

 

xxxxxxx

Defendant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it is too late to send a letter offering them until the 13 May as I think my defence has to be by 14th and tomorrow is 11th. (Have had a hectic time with the elderly parents this week and not had much time to sit down and work on this)

 

I think I'm going to write my defence as shown above by nicklea and maybe mention in the defence that I have asked twice for the CPR stuff and so far had no joy... OR can I enter the N244 thing anytime between my entering my defence and any court date?

 

PLease can someone hold my hand on this one?

 

Thanks

I'm a L-Plate cagger - new at all this but determined to learn as much as I can, to help as many others as I can, and to fight back as often as I can!:-x

Any help or advice from me is offered in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience gained either from here or from my own cases. I am NOT a legal expert. There are several other CAG members and the site team who are much better qualified than me. Please do not make any decisions based on my advice alone.

Donate as much as you can to this site as often as you can! We need to keep on helping each other.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...