Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Finance U Ltd Car Repossession letter received **Round 1 WON... Ding, ding... Round 2 now on**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

please post jan 8 default notice

 

am i reading this right

 

you got the default notice on jan 8

on the 7 jan they took the car

 

is this all 2008

 

please confirm as important and post that default notice

 

i

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No the last default notice we received was 29/1/2008 for 653.00,

these arrears were cleared by 24/6/2008,

my husband then lost his job due to sickness and arrears built up again,

 

 

after a reduced payment by the 31/12/2008 I was 1080.00 in arrears,

and 7 days later on 07/01/2009 they came to collect the car with no default notice sent between these dates i.e Jan 08 - Jan 09....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Oh well, today Ive received an identical 'FINAL WARNING' letter to the one Finance U Limited sent me in April, but this time they are giving me until 21 May 2009. If that was the final warning why are they sending another final warning??

NWJxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I dont really want to go into detail on open forum, just in case of watchers:rolleyes:...dont want to give them an advantage... but the info I have received on here could mean good things for me, fingers crossed, just need the guts to fight back...let us know what they come up with on the SAR... They really are a nasty piece of work, they lied and threatened all sorts before coming to get the car, Im wondering did you have the pleasure of speakinfg to Peter 'the bailiff', in hindsight he talked the biggest load of bull...I would love to get a result on this one, I will keep you posted of any developments

 

Take care

NWJ -X-

Link to post
Share on other sites

thankfull no, i didnt meet him.

i (luckily) moved home just when i got into problems and they didnt have my new telephone number (which i now never give to ANY company and am ex-directory).

I sent them a letter stating where i had parked the car, included the key and left them to it - there was no way i was putting myself through the ordeal of facing them after all the nasty telephone calls i had been getting before i moved and they had my address - but oddly i never had anyone come to either house!!!

 

good luck, about time these had a lesson in how to treat decent people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes sure :

 

1. By a credit agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 and dated 27 Jan 2007, the claimant lent to the defendants the sum of £8990 to be repaid with interest and charges by one instalment of £362 on the 27 Feb 2007 and 59 equal monthly instalments of £262 thereafter.

 

2. The defendants are currently in arrears with the said agreement and by letters before action dated 7 May 2009. the amount outstanding was £6820.

 

3. No payments have been received from the defendants since the letters before action were issued.

 

4. Accordingly, the defendants are indebted to the claimant for the sum of £6820

 

5. There are attached to this claim form copies of the sales invoice from C P G (Wales) Plc T/A Corner Park (item 1), the credit agreement (item 2) and the letters before action (item 3)

 

6. The claimant claims the said sum of £6820

 

 

 

They attached the above to the claim form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You Have 14 Days To Acknowledge So We Will Use Them

 

We Have Been Waiting For This

 

The Crap Default Notice Comes Into Its Own Now

 

May I Ask How Much Are You In Arrears Before They Sent The Default Notice

 

They Are In For A Nasty Surprise

 

Are A Solicitors Dealing With This Or The Finance Co

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mean the arrears when they issue the last default notice way back in Jan 2008, or do you mean how much were the arrears before they came and took the car:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well We Have Them On The Default Notice And As A Court Claim Has Begun, Its Tough Luck For Them.

 

Now For This To Work, You Need Over The Next 3 To 4 Months Get Together £653

 

If You Get A Ccj,

Pay That With In 30 Days And No Ccj Would Be Registered And Kiss Goodby To The Balance Also

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...