Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
    • Why the Nordic nation, despite its reputation for social equality, has so many billionaires.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

help with mbna debt please !!!!


Potless1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi, i have a mbna credit card which amounts to £15k & i was made redundant 7 months ago in which time i have not made any payment due to my circumstances which i told them about & to be fair they were understanding, they called me a month or 2 ago saying that they would take a settlement figure of £4k & wipe off the £11k debt which i said i would try & somehow raise the money but unfortunately i have had no joy as yet, they called me a couple of weeks ago to see how i was getting on with raising the money & i said that i would need more time, they asked me to pay £240 to give me another month otherwise the debt would be sold on to a debt collector so i had to make the payment as i did not want the debt collectors on my back with the original payment of £15k, mbna rang me again this morning asking how i was getting on in finding the money which i said again i need more time as it is something i would love to do as it seems a good deal, they then said i would need to make another payment of £240 by the end of the month to keep the debt collectors away.

can anyone help me please, i am on £62 a week JSA & i cannot afford to p[ay £240 each month but i dont want the debt collectors asking for the full £15k when i could get away with paying just £4k if i could find the cash which is hard at the moment ! :-|

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi i am in the same possition. but am getting confused with all the posts on here saying not to accept the partial payment. but i am thinking its ok. have been told on the phone that if its paid the account will be closed and they nor anyone will chase you for the ballance. but yes it does seem as if you have to pay the monthly amount to keep it alive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the partial payment sounds a bargain & they said the same that the account will be closed & you wont hear another word.

 

the thing that worries me is making the £240 monthly payment while im trying to beg, steal or borrow the money is also hard to find at the moment but as you say it must be paid to keep the debt collectors out of the way !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I personally think you're on a hiding to nothing. Unless you can get the cash together MBNA will sell your debt to a Debt collector.

 

can you say how long ago you took the card out?

 

I would send MBNA a CCA request.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html#post162367

 

Send with a £1 postal order and send it recorded delivery

 

Do you know if there are charges applied to your account? If so you could SAR them instead.

 

If you do get the money together, make sure that MBNA agree that it's a F&F settlement and that they won't chase you or sell on the balance to a DCA.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys/gals,

 

It is totally unacceptable under the OFT guidance on debt collection to suggest that you increase your borrowing in order to pay off a debt.

 

Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not an option.

 

My response is to suggest, as Silver says that you immediately CCA them and check your credit file as the CC has probably already defaulted you and messed up your credit rating.

 

Please do not speak to them EVER, work only in writing as you then have clear evidence should it go to court.

 

Also don't worry about the debt collectors - THEY ARE POWERLESS - they have very strict rules about what they can and can't do or say and you are a long way away from them even contemplating a visit.

 

There is also a further letter that you can send/combine with your CCA request which tells them clearly that you do not wish to speak to them or have a visit.

 

Provided that the credit card was opened earlier than April 2007, when the law changed, the debt is unenforceable without a correctly executed CCA

 

GKTP

(BTW my name is because I WAS, in a past life, a debt collector)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was opened in 2005ish !

 

so with this CCa i am going to ask them for, what happens if they dont send it ? or if they say they do not have it ?

this is the first time in my 50 years i have been out of work & i hate it, i hate people chasing me for money when i have a mortgage to pay, 2 teenage kids at school, cars to run & all i get is £62 a week with the future looking bleak !

 

also with the sttlement figure of £4k which wipes off £11k i presume if i do not keep the payment of £240 up to date each month & the debt does go to a debt collector then the settlement figure will be no longer & i will be liable for the full £15k + charges ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not one to advocate debt avoidance but when a bank starts playing dirty by offering deals which you may not be able to go with and this then encourages you to get another loan to pay them, I think it's time to go back at them.

 

The CCA request will get back a copy of your agreement and if it's faulty in some way, the bank can't enforce a debt.

 

If during the life of the card, you have incurred charges, you could reclaim them to help reduce the balance.

 

If the bank sells the debt to a DCA(rather than pass it on to their in-house collectors) the DCA will pay between 10 and 20 percent for it and chase you for the entire debt(how fair is that?) and the bank will write off the debt against their tax liability.

 

As you are on the basic a human has to live on, MBNA should be getting £1 a month, no more. If they don't like it-tough.

 

 

fox

  • Haha 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

you must moove this thread to legal issues now that you got a letter from Restons. place that letter here. Is very likely that you will get a court claim next. The same as me, same letter. alert the site team by clicking the triangle!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...