Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

reasonable identification


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi -

 

i asked for credit report under DPA and sent £2 to each of the credit rating agencies. i could not do it online as my credit rating is so bad i do not have the necessary bank card you apparently need.

 

i received letters back from all the CRAs saying they need more identification. they asked for originals of bank statements/bills or copies of driving license or passport. i sent copy of passport but do not have any of the others as i deal with paperless statements/billing or the bills are in house-mates names.

 

i now have received similar replies from all of them that they will not accept my id. how the hell am I supposed to get my credit report?? a friend who worked at a bank got it for me from work a year ago no problem as a favour.

 

1) how is this possible - is it not MY data?

2) does the data protection act not state REASONABLE identification?

 

what is my next move - can i take it to court and make them comply??

 

any help would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

did they give any reasons for not supplying the info? Seems odd that all 3 did the exact same thing.

 

Are you on electoral reg? have you recently moved there? do you have any credit that is reported to the cra's?

 

Also on the subject of paperless billing, the bill is normally still produced and downloadable and printable still.

 

Ps here is a link to get a free report once a year http://www.annualcreditreport.co.uk/ Not sure if the link is allowed, sorry if it's not

Edited by version302003
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi version302003

 

Thank you so much for your response... Just to give you more info etc:

 

experian said the documents I sent:

- "Do not meet with our requirements"

 

callcredit said:

- "Cannot accept letter from bank as it does not refer to a specific account"

- "Cannot accept notice of suspension letters"

(I sent them an original letter from my Internet Service Provider which notified me of upcoming suspension)

 

equifax:

- "Not as listed in our request"

 

In answer to your other questions:

 

Are you on electoral reg?

I am not on the electoral reg

 

Have you recently moved there?

No I have been there for over 2 and a half years

 

Do you have any credit that is reported to the cra's?

I don't understand - sorry

 

Also on the subject of paperless billing, the bill is normally still produced and downloadable and printable still.

I did not want to send them details of what I have been spending or getting.. Do they really need to know this?? Also, they asked for ORIGINAL letters - not copies - which I sent them.

 

Any further advice? - want to take this to court and have them enforce it. I think that 2 original letters to my address and with my name on them, and a photocopy of my passport (which is what I sent) should be more than enough for them to identify me??

 

Callcredit also had the cheek to ask for documents from my previous address - whaaat??

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you havent lived at the address for 6 years then they want to know what the previous address was., no idea why tho.

 

I think they are entited to ask for proof of identity but im not sure how far they can drag that one out esp as you have provided a copy of passport and other letters.

 

Have you asked them what specifically is the reason for them to require proof of identity?

 

Do you have a bank statement you can send?(you can alway blank out the amounts)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They say they require id for security reasons..

 

As for bank statements - I have them - but they are generally asking for documents within 3 months. Guess I could send them, but this will take even more time. Think I need to go in heavier.

 

I just want to know how to enforce them to give me the report. I am prepared to fill out an N1, as I don't think other methods will prove fruitful. Under the Data Protection I know they cannot demand such stringent proof as I don't think anyone would deem it reasonable. Just don't know if there is anything I can enforce them to comply under?

 

Thanks a lot for the responses...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a principle thing as well. They need reasonable identification, not my bank statements with all other kinds of information on them. Does anyone know if this is something I can pursue under the Data Protection Act - and if so, under what section can I ensure they provide me with my credit report? This is out of order what they are asking and by solving this, I will also make it easier for many others with bonafide identification documents to obtain their credit report without the CRAs having more information to wield than they already have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scrather,

 

In order to verify who you are so that they dont send your details to the wrong person, they need your id and proof of address - hence why they asked for utility bills. I had the same query done to me and once i provided them with that they needed, i had my report. I also have paperliss bills and you need to print them (just the first page) and have your local bank to stamp it for proof of authencity.

 

The reason they are asking previous addresses is also so that they can give you everything they hold about your data.

 

I hope that answers some of your questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think people think I am being unreasonable.. but I have sent them:

 

- A list of all my previous addresses (as per the template letter on the Information Commissioner website)

- Originals of two letters sent to me from bank/utility at my address within the last 3 months

- A copy of my passport

 

They do not need to see any information of my previous addresses to identify me - I haven't even kept any. I cannot understand how a bank statement is any different other than it may contain more information for them to flog. I cannot get statements stamped as I have a basic account which the cashiers at the bank refuse to serve me and tell me to write to customer services. I have already spent much time and effort and believe that the CRAs are just taking me for a ride. Therefore I want to enforce my rights that is all.

 

Can anybody who understands the DPA please respond as to how I can enforce them sending my credit report given that I believe I have sent them reasonable ID.

 

Nice one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe you can take out a Part 8 procedure in the County Court as a claim for specific performance to enforce the Subject Access Request... Anyone have any experience of this?

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/taking_a_case_to_court.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
If you havent lived at the address for 6 years then they want to know what the previous address was., no idea why tho.

 

I think they are entited to ask for proof of identity but im not sure how far they can drag that one out esp as you have provided a copy of passport and other letters.

 

Have you asked them what specifically is the reason for them to require proof of identity?

 

Do you have a bank statement you can send?(you can alway blank out the amounts)

 

You could always ring the Office of the information commissioner , i think their criteria is that you have to prove you are yourself to the exclusion of others of the same name . I agree that when asking for your data from a company whose business it is to collect your data and sell it , it seems unfair that they expect you to do their job , while you exercise your rights .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the response though.

 

I will ring the IC for sure. In the meantime I unfortunately have no Credit Report and I cannot even begin to clear it up so that I will finally have a proper bank account - not a kiddy card from the post office! I cannot pay for anything online and so losing out on loads of deals.

 

I have heard that the IC takes a notoriously long time to do anything in writing and that's what I need really to enforce the CRAs to give me information that affects me.

 

Was more wondering if anyone had any experience of asking the court to look at the matter without claiming for damages or anything - think its called special performance. Could then take a claim under DPA98 and I'm sure it wouldn't take long for a judge to see I have sent more than reasonable documentation. It could also serve to put pressure on the CRAs to supply the info to avoid any court stuff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the response though.

 

I will ring the IC for sure. In the meantime I unfortunately have no Credit Report and I cannot even begin to clear it up so that I will finally have a proper bank account - not a kiddy card from the post office! I cannot pay for anything online and so losing out on loads of deals.

 

I have heard that the IC takes a notoriously long time to do anything in writing and that's what I need really to enforce the CRAs to give me information that affects me.

 

Was more wondering if anyone had any experience of asking the court to look at the matter without claiming for damages or anything - think its called special performance. Could then take a claim under DPA98 and I'm sure it wouldn't take long for a judge to see I have sent more than reasonable documentation. It could also serve to put pressure on the CRAs to supply the info to avoid any court stuff.

I was thinking more of getting the chapter and verse from the Ico office as to what a sar requires for Id , putting that in a fax /letter to the Cra , and trying to chivy them along in the interests of common sense , saves them having to answer to special performance , shows willing on your part , and thwarts their information fishing expedition , they can't help themselves!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...