Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today , after a lotof years i recieved a letter from this lot. Very friendly, "Were writing to remind you that we havent had any contact from you in a while".  The velvet fist, followed by  a veiled threat to get their preferred debt collectors involved. Yep dead right. In 1992/3 I took out a Student load under duress from DHSS. uP TO 2000 I hadsucessfully gotten deferment on low income. But rarther thansign on as unemployed,I decided to be self employed. I applied and they asked for all sorts of documents. I obliged and then correspondance ceased from them, circa 2001. To date  I have had no correspondance from Student Loans. I was made  redundant in 2009 and  reached 65 in 2012 , at which age the loan should have been cancelled. Now ,today, 12 years on retirement and 11 ( at least years after last contact) I get a letter with veiled threats. Do I , as I smell a scam a) ignore it and hope that Erudio will think that this phishing attempt has failed or b) respond with a statute barred letter or c) remind them of legal terms that loan should be cancelled 12 years ago or d) combination of b) +c)      
    • But I'm not mixing and matching. Sure, when researching I do check multiple avenues, but when speaking, I will open a single post. The Fb post was made in March, it is now June, time has passed, and when the suggestion was made, no further information was given on how I should progress beyond "send a letter", which has meant that I've needed to start another stream - this one, but only after taking the time to research first.
    • hes not turning you away he is simply saying that you should stick to one channel of advice. he is perfectly happy with that channel being this forum, and he will help you   all he is saying, and I agree, is that you should stick to one help channel, not mix and match 3/4
    • As long as we are clear . Do the reading and post your letter of claim in draft form as requested and we can go from there.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with benefits please


InLumba
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Could someone help me out.

 

Basically for the past couple of years i have been getting income support due to depression, i attended an assessement few weeks back and recieved a letter this morning telling me that i scored 7 points out of 15 and therefore from the 4/3/09 i am not entitled to National Insurance Credits.

 

Can someone explain what this means please.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Inlumba,

 

For most people, there will be periods of their working life when they are not paying contributions because they are not working. Without help this would mean you would have gaps in your national insurance record and this could prevent you getting benefits. In particular, it could affect your State Retirement Pension. The national insurance scheme recognises many of these situations and allows you to qualify for credits or home responsibility protection if you are looking after a child or disabled person.

 

National insurance credits

 

 

National insurance credits are Class 1 contributions which you do not pay for. Credits are added to your contribution record when you are unemployed or have limited capability for work, and in some other situations where you are not working for particular reasons. They will not be paid automatically unless HMRC know about your circumstances - for example, you must be signing on with the Jobcentre Plus office, or have a medical certificate. For some types of credits, you also have to apply in writing.

You get credits when you are 16 for the first three years of your contribution record if your record would otherwise be insufficient. You may also be entitled to credits for years in which you are in training or education. You can get credits for weeks doing jury service, weeks in which you get carer’s allowance, and for weeks in which you get Statutory Maternity Pay or Statutory Adoption Pay.

If you are a man aged 60 to 65 and you are not paying contributions on earnings (because, for example, you have taken early retirement), you will get NI credits.

National insurance credits will not help you to qualify for all benefits.

The rules about when you get credits and when you have to apply for them are very complicated. If you have a query about national insurance credits you should consult an experienced adviser, for example, at a Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

Hope this helps

Baz

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Baz, i will try contact the CAB tomorrow although doubt i will get through.

 

Any idea what this means in my situation that my NI credits have been stopped?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regards your pension, when you are eligible for it, any gaps in your national insurance contributions record ( NIC record ), could affect your entitlement and/or the amount you receive. A lot of people who end up for one reason or another having these gaps in their NIC, pay voluntary NIC's.

Whether it will make sense for you to do this, depends on a number of factors including ......The amount you've contributed already, and the date you reach pension age.

As i said in my earlier post, The amount of basic State Pension (and certain other state benefits) you're entitled to is based on your NICs record over your working life from age 16 until State Pension age. This record is made up from NICs paid or credited to you in each tax year. A minimum amount of contributions is required to make each year count as a 'qualifying year' towards your overall contributions record.

How gaps in your NICs record might occur

 

 

There could be gaps in your NICs record for various reasons. For example, you may have been:

  • employed and had low earnings (below the lower earnings limit of £90 a week (2008-09 rates)
  • unemployed and not claiming benefit
  • self-employed and exempt from paying Class 2 contributions because you applied for, and were issued with, a Certificate of Exception
  • living abroad

How many qualifying years do you need to get the full basic State Pension?

 

This depends on when you reach State Pension age. If this is on or after 6 April 2010 you'll need fewer qualifying years than at present. Also, from that date the number of qualifying years needed for a full basic State Pension for men and women will be the same, whereas at present they are different.

 

Effect on your basic State Pension if you don't have the full number of qualifying years.

 

 

men 11 to 44 qualifying years and women 10 to 39 will be allowed between £22.67 and £90.70 per week, depending on circumstances.

 

men 0-10 qualifying years and women 0-9 wont get any state pension based on their own NIC's but may claim something off their partners PROVIDED the partner has payed enough NIC's.

 

if you visit HM Revenue & Customs: Home Page then browse the site, you will find all the information necessary.

 

Failing that, contact your local tax office who will ( i'm sure ) help you with anything further that you need to know.

 

Don't forget to pop back on here if you have any further prob's, cus there always someone on here to help.

 

Good luck

 

Baz

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter youve received is telling you that you have failed your "personal capablity and ability test (PCA test)". This means that your credits only claim to Incapacity Benefit has ceased and as a result your claim to Income support will end too.

 

It seems that originally you hadnt paid enough contributions to recieve Incapacity Benefit in its own right and you have been claiming Income support to live off.

 

You have three choices and they are as follows:

 

1. Claim Income support at a lower rate (dependant on age an personal circumstances but usually around £40 per week) and appeal against the decision that you have failed your pca test. Ring the call centre and make a new claim, and use the GL24 form (should have been sent with your decision letter) to appeal against the decision.

 

2. Claim Jobseekers Allowance and appeal against the decision that you have failed your pca test, but you will have to be available and capable of work. Ring the Call Centre and make a new claim. Send the completed GL24 form - appeal form (should have beens sent to you with the decision letter).

 

3. Claim Jobseekers Allowance, again you will have to be available, capable and actively seeking work. Ring the call centre and make a new claim.

 

The important thing to do is ...do something....you can claim the lower rate Income support but that would mean less money to live off until your appeal has had a decision ruled on it. You can claim the Jobseekers allowance but you will have to sign on fortnightly and provide evidence of what you have done to find work.

 

I would suggest that you appeal against the decison no matter what...it is within your rights and you may have the decision overturned...that would mean that if you had been paid at the lower rate of Income Support they would back date it and pay you the difference between the money you were paid and the money you would have been entitled to had they not closed your claim.

 

If you did claim Income support at the lower rate and the decision that you are fit for work stands, you will no longer have an entitlement to Income Support, you will have to claim Jobseekers Allowance anyway.

 

I hope this helps.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...