Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The lawsuits allege the companies preyed upon "vulnerable" young men like the 18-year-old Uvalde gunman.View the full article
    • Hi, despite saying you would post it up we have not seen the WS or EVRis WS. Please can you post them up.
    • Hi, Sorry its taken me so long to get round to this, i've been pretty busy today. Anyway, just a couple of things based on your observations.   Evri have not seen/read my WS (sent by post and by email) as they would have recognised the claim value is over £1000 as it includes court fees, trial fees, postage costs and interests, and there is a complete breakdown of the different costs and evidence. I'd say theres a 1% chance they read it , but in any case it won't change what they write. They refer to the claim amount that you claimed in your claim form originally, which will likely be in the same as the defence. They use a simple standard copy and paste format for WX and I've never seen it include any amount other than on the claim form but this is immaterial because it makes no difference to whether evri be liable and if so to what value which is the matter in dispute. However, I have a thinking that EVRi staff are under lots of pressure, they seem to be working up to and beyond 7pm even on fridays, and this is quite unusual so they likely save time by just copying and pasting certain lines of their defence to form their WX.   Evri accepts the parcel is lost after it entered their delivery network - again, this is in my WS and is not an issue in dispute. This is just one of their copy paste lines that they always use.   Evri mentions the £25 and £4.82 paid by Packlink - Again, had they read the WS, they would have realised this is not an issue in dispute. They probably haven't read your WS but did you account for this in your claim form?   Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency This supports the view that once a user (i.e, myself) selects a transport agency (i.e Evri) that best suits the user's needs, the user (i.e, myself) enters into a contract with the chosen transport agency (i.e, myself). Therefore, under the T&Cs, there is a contract between myself and Evri.   This is correct but you have gone into this claim as trying to claim as a third party. I would say that you need to pick which fight you wan't to make. Either you pick the fight that you contracted directly with EVRi therefore you can apply the CRA OR you pick the fight that you are claiming as a third party contract to a contract between packlink and EVRi. Personally, I would go with the argument that you contracted directly with evri because the terms and conditions are pretty clear that the contract is formed with EVRi and so if the judge accepts this you are just applying your CR under CRA 2015, of which there has only been 2 judges I have seen who have failed to accept the argument of the CRA.   Evri cites their pre-existing agreement with Packlink and that I cannot enforce 3rd party rights under the 1999 Act. Evri has not provided a copy of this contract, and furthermore, my point above explains that the T&Cs clearly explains I have entered into a contract when i chose Evri to deliver my parcel.    This is fine, but again I would say that you should focus on claiming under the contract you have with EVRi as you entered into a direct contract with them according to packlink, as this gives less opportunites for the judge to get things wrong, also I think this is a much better legal position because you can apply your CR to it, if you dealt with a third party claim you would likely need to rely on business contract rights.   As explained in my WS, i am the non-gratuitous beneficiary as my payment for Evri's delivery service through Packlink is the sole reason for the principal contract coming into existence. I wouldn't focus this as your argument. I did think about this earlier and I think the sole focus of your claim should be that you contracted with evri and any term within their T&Cs that limits their liability is a breach of CRA. If you try to argue that the payment to packlink is the sole reason for the contract coming in between EVRI and packlink then you are essentially going against yourself since on one hand you are (And should be) arguing that you contracted directly with EVRi, but on the other hand by arguing about funding the contract between packlink and evri you are then saying that the contract is between packlink and evri not you and evri.  I think you should focus your argument that the contract is between you and evri as the packlink T&C's say.   Clearly Evri have not read by WS as the above is all clearly explained in there.   I doubt they have too, but I think their witness statement more than anything is an attempt to sort of confuse things. They reference various parts of the T&Cs within their WS and I've left some more general points on their WS below although I do think  point 3b as you have mentioned is very important because it says "Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line." which I would argue means that you contract directly with the agency. For points 9 and 10 focus on term 3c of the contract  points 15-18 are the same as points 18-21 of the defence if you look at it (as i said above its just a copy paste exercise) point 21 term 3c again point 23 is interesting - it says they are responsible for organising it but doesnt say anything about a contract  More generally for 24-29 it seems they are essentially saying you agreed to packlinks terms which means you can't have a contract with EVRI. This isnt true, you have simply agreed to the terms that expressly say your contract is formed with the ttransport agency (EVRi). They also reference that packlinks obligations are £25 but again this doesn't limit evris obligations, there is nothing that says that the transport agency isnt liable for more, it just says that packlinks limitation is set. for what its worth point 31 has no applicability because the contract hasn't been produced.   but overall I think its most important to focus on terms 3b and 3c of the contract and apply your rights as a consumer and not as a third party and use the third party as a backup   
    • Ms Vennells gave testimony over three days, watched by those affected by the Post Office scandal.View the full article
    • Punters are likely not getting the full amount of alcohol they are paying for, a new study suggests.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC credit card CCA is it enforceable


omoeko
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5227 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

cheers for the letter, going off to them, but what can i do regarding my enforceable loan and my unenforceable Credit card, as they seem to want me to get a managed loan and wouldnt budge on making reduced payments only on the loan.

 

Looks like, I'm just going to make reduced payments on the loan only and the wheel should keep turning on the credt card, i sense it will be a long hard fight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

cheers for the letter, going off to them, but what can i do regarding my enforceable loan and my unenforceable Credit card, as they seem to want me to get a managed loan and wouldnt budge on making reduced payments only on the loan.

 

Looks like, I'm just going to make reduced payments on the loan only and the wheel should keep turning on the credt card, i sense it will be a long hard fight.

 

Hi Guys

 

Any ideas here ?

 

If i am making minimal payments monthly, even though the creditor is trying to force me to take on a new managed loan, can i still get a CCJ ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would anyone be daft enough to agree to a managed loan when part of it comprises of an unenforceable debt?

 

As for the enforceable loan if you are making affordable payments in the unlikely event that they applied for a CCJ a judge wouldn't look at them too kindly & would be unlikely to make you pay more than you are at present.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All

 

I have now received a response from MSBC, can someone clarify thier position for me please.

 

If anyone needs the original terms & conditions which was sent to me as a CCA, please let me know.

 

Page0003.jpg

 

 

 

Page0001.jpg

Edited by omoeko
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this;

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

 

Account no

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

 

Thank you for your letter dated ........, the contents of which are noted

 

Your attention is drawn to the fact that this account is subject to a serious dispute. On ......... I requested that ........... supply me a copy of the credit agreement covering this account pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78. To date ........... have failed to comply with my request. Without production of the said agreement I am unable to assess if I am indeed liable for any alleged debt to .............., nor does it give me any chance to evaluate whether any original agreement was ‘properly executed’ as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

For the avoidance of any doubt I have included section 78(1) and 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, which states…

 

78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of [£1], shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) the state of the account, and

(b) the amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

 

Clearly as no agreement was supplied on request, this in no way complies with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and I now draw your attention to section 78 subsection 6 which states If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

 

Clearly this is a situation as described in S.78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the debt is unenforceable at this time. In addition, I draw your attention to section 127 (3) Consumer Credit Act 1974 which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the consumer credit act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

 

To clarify S.61(1) states

 

(1)A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

 

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

© The document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible

 

In addition the prescribed terms referred to in section 60 CCA1974 are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following—

 

1.Number of repayments;

2.Amount of repayments;

3.Frequency and timing of repayments;

4.Dates of repayments;

5.The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable

 

Therefore based upon the Consumer Credit Act 1974 this debt as it stands is unenforceable and should this proceed to litigation, a court is precluded from making an enforcement order under section 127(3) unless a true copy of the signed agreement is produced..

 

At the point where this account entered into the default situation as described in s78 (6) CCA 1974 no other charges are allowed to be added until such time as ............... become compliant with my request. As ................ are still not in compliance with my request I insist that the following takes place with immediate effect

 

All entries which refer to missed payments be removed from my credit file

All collection activities cease with immediate effect until ............. comply with my request from .date........... or such time as a court makes an enforcement order

In addition, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on Debt Collection

 

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I have enclosed an excerpt from page 5 of the guidance which states

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

 

What I Require.

 

I require that you send me a true copy of the executed agreement as required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. If you are unable to supply the requested documentation because no such agreement is in existence I require written clarification as such.

 

I require that you comply with my request within 7 days of the date of this letter. I will not correspond any further with you until I either receive a copy of the requested documents as laid down in section 78(1) CCA 74 or clarification that such agreement doesn’t exist. I am advised that should you persist in pursuing this debt ignoring the above information you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well

 

No other correspondence will be accepted

 

Should you attempt litigation it will be vigorously defended and the failure to supply documentation under the CCA 1974 is a complete defence to any legal action and your actions will be vexatious and unlawful

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

 

Yours,

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CCA = no proof of debt

 

typical HSBC attitude in those 2 letters, just a standard reply from them

when they cannot enforce an account... don't pay anything towards the credit card until they get back to you with a properly executed agreement that is signed by you of which they cannot supply and HSBC know it :wink:

 

have they attempted to call you since you sent the harrassment letter?, don't talk to them on the phone ever they trying to shove a managed loan down your throat which you do not want

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for this cerberusalert, what can i do about the fact that since January when this started, they have been adding interest to the account.

 

Also

 

They said that they referred to it in some document or the other, would this constitute a legit CCA if it was referred to ?

 

Lastly, HSBC dont take documents seriously if its not signed, as they always say they need to verify the identity of the customer which in a way is understandable, what do i do ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

In the original CCA response which I got off them, they included a stamped/signed copy of the credit card statement, the section of the letter which cerberusalert stated that:

 

" 78 Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement

(1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of [£1], shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a) The state of the account, and

(b) The amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© The amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; "

 

 

I have some few questions here for my own understanding:

 

 

(a) The state of the account, and

(b) The amount, if any, currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

© The amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

Could they come back and say, the signed/stamped statement we gave you already has all this information, or should this be part of the original agreement if any ? or can this be retrospectively handed to me.

 

 

 

 

(a) He is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; "

 

 

They have not resolved the issue and its not my fault that they are taking long to respond to letters, can i start a seperate dispute about the interest being added to the account since the 12 working days elapsed, would this be mentioned in a seperate letter to thier complaints dept or can i include in this letter as well ?

Can someone also clarify the situation with the signature please, as I can see them ignoring this letter without a signature as when i requested the CCA itself, they said they wouldnt honour it until a signature has been provided, besides they have my signature within the bank anyway and if they wanted to forge this, I dont think nothing will stop them, remember I have a bank account & a loan which is enforceable with them.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

HSBC are now issuing a default notice and threathening court action, is it worth scanning the document here, what can i do now. They are also referring to an agreement in the default letter, but have not shown me any agreement apart from a bunch of T&C's, what can i do now. The last letter posted by the gentleman was posted to them last week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ladies and Gents

 

What can i do now, they have sent me a default notice and are threathening court action, this was sent a day after I sent the letter cerberusalet helped me write. should i ignnore this or would another letter do here ?

 

would scan the default letter on the site today. is this needed ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There terms & conditions are not a enforceable agreement it must have required prescribed terms and be signed by you

 

what they sent you is not enforceable

 

 

HSBC must fully comply with your request for a copy of the signed agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

HSBC are now looking a little deperate, they threathened me to make payments ASAP, but at thesame time they also sent me a really good offer for a managed loan, reduced interests to next to nothing, also stated that reduced payments can be made for an indefinite period obviously until debt is fully repaid, problem is that they are still adding the credit card element to it which is unenforceable, at the moment I am still paying them what I can afford (Personal loans) only.

 

What letter can i send to them now since the credit card guys and HQ are 2 seperate people I'm now dealing with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you have 14 days after you received the notice?

 

Don't worry about the DN, that's just something they have to send prior to marking your credit file & closing the account before passing the a/c on to a DCA.

 

There are a couple of things you can do now, the first is to ignore them & wait for a DCA to get involved....they can be dealt with easily enough. The other is to send a SAR to them which will cost £10 http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html This will provide you with statements & a copy of the CCA if they have one, plus it'll give you the chance to work out any unfair charges they may have added which you can claim back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the SAR option is a good one, they are indeed proving a little difficult. They said this could only be done on the phone, dont know if its already been ordered.

 

Does anyone know an address to write to, I told them i prefer to write in, but they wouldn't give me an address either.

 

Does anyone have an address for HSBC SAR

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi Guys

 

 

Thought I give an update, after sending series of letters to HSBC pointing out the fact that they have not provided an enforceable agreement over the last couple of months.

 

They don't seem to acknowledge this fact, but now they have come back to me on the credit card, despite the fact they I have other debts with them, and when they have tried to force a managed loan on my throat, I have resited and said "NO". I have also pointed out the fact that if they want to place it all in a managed loan, one of the debts is unenfoeceable.

 

They have recently sent me a letter stating that I should make them an offer to settle the matter.

 

I am thinking that since the debt is unenforceable, and they dont want to seem to accept this and the only way this would be ersolved is if it goes all the way to the courts. I am thinking of making them a cheeky offer on the basis of take it or leave it since I should not even be paying back a penny as the debt is unenfoeceable in the first place.

 

What do you guys think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello Guys,

 

I have just had a letter from Metropolitan debt collection services asking for the total amount of debt owed to HSBC credit card, this is despote the fact that they have not sent me an enforceable CCA, what should I do now ?

 

The letter sounds pretty intimidating, should I ask the DCA for an agreement as well and see what they come up with ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...