Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£80 Fine - No tax - car scrapped


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5115 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Be careful. s.7A was an amendment to VERA 1994, introduced by Schedule 5, Finance Act 2002. Your claim is that you sent the document and DVLA are deemed to have received it. I wonder what legislation they are using to say the Interpretation Act does not apply in your case.

 

 

 

 

  • s.7A - Supplement payable on vehicle ceasing to be appropriately covered.

(1) Regulations may make provision for a supplement of a prescribed amount to be payable where— (a)

a vehicle has ceased to be appropriately covered,

 

(b)

the vehicle is not, before the end of the relevant prescribed period, appropriately covered as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1A) below with effect from the time immediately after it so ceased or appropriately covered as mentioned in paragraph (d) of that subsection, and

 

©

the circumstances are not such as may be prescribed.]

 

 

 

(1A) For the purposes of this section and section 7B a vehicle is appropriately covered if (and only if)— (a)

a vehicle licence or trade licence is in force for or in respect of the vehicle,

 

(b)

the vehicle is an exempt vehicle in respect of which regulations under this Act require a nil licence to be in force and a nil licence is in force in respect of it,

 

©

the vehicle is an exempt vehicle that is not one in respect of which regulations under this Act require a nil licence to be in force, or

 

(d)

the vehicle is neither kept nor used on a public road and the declarations and particulars required to be delivered by regulations under section 22(1D) have been delivered in relation to it in accordance with the regulations within the immediately preceding period of 12 months.

 

 

(1B) Where a vehicle for or in respect of which a vehicle licence is in force is transferred by the holder of the vehicle licence to another person, the vehicle licence is to be treated for the purposes of subsection (1A) as no longer in force unless it is delivered to the other person with the vehicle.

(1C) Where— (a)

an application is made for a vehicle licence for any period, and

 

(b)

a temporary licence is issued pursuant to the application,

 

 

subsection (1B) does not apply to the licence applied for if, on a transfer of the vehicle during the currency of the temporary licence, the temporary licence is delivered with the vehicle to the transferee.

(1D) In subsection (1)(b) “the relevant prescribed period” means such period beginning with the date on which the vehicle ceased to be appropriately covered as is prescribed.]

(2) A supplement under this section— (a)

shall be payable by such person, or jointly and severally by such persons, as may be prescribed;

 

(b)

shall become payable at such time as may be prescribed;

 

©

may be of an amount that varies according to the length of the period between—

(i) the time of a notification (in accordance with regulations under section 7B(1)) to, or in relation to, a person by whom it is payable, and

(ii) the time at which it is paid.]

 

 

 

(3) A supplement under this section that has become payable— (a)

is in addition to any vehicle excise duty charged in respect of the vehicle concerned;

 

(b)

does not cease to be payable by reason of the vehicle being again appropriately covered] after the supplement has become payable;

 

©

may, without prejudice to section 6 or 7B(2) and (3) or any other provision of this Act, be recovered as a debt due to the Crown.

 

 

(4) In this section— (a)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 

(b)

“prescribed" means prescribed by, or determined in accordance with, regulations;

 

©

“regulations" means regulations made by the Secretary of State with the consent of the Treasury.

 

 

(5) No regulations to which subsection (6) applies shall be made under this section unless a draft of the regulations has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.

(6) This subsection applies to regulations under this section that— (a)

provide for a supplement to be payable in a case where one would not otherwise be payable,

 

(b)

increase the amount of a supplement,

 

©

provide for a supplement to become payable earlier than it would otherwise be payable, or

 

(d)

provide for a supplement to be payable by a person by whom the supplement would not otherwise be payable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok so update time, I received a letter from someone a bit higher up.. Mrs Chadderton. basically saying that i am still liable for it. I will scan the letter in so you can all read it! I am still not happy and have already found some points which there are some discrepancies(sp) with! I will draft the letter I want to send back on here too..

 

scan0001.jpg

 

scan0003.jpg

 

 

 

Thats their 2 page letter

 

And my reply:

 

 

Dear Mrs Chadderton

 

 

I am still not happy with the response you have given me. Please let me point out a few facts in this matter. You refer to the documents needing to be “delivered” to the Secretary of State and not merely sent. I will quote section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978 which does indeed cover this:

Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression “serve” or the expression “give” or “send” or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.”

In bold you will see that any other expression is used. Deliver is merely another expression. I have therefore fulfilled every obligation to send the necessary paperwork back to you, as soon as the letter was posted I have done everything in my power to get the document to you. I can ensure that it was posted before the road tax even ran out on the car in question.

You have also said that after looking at the recent record of M****X that no notification was made, please see enclosed with this letter a copy of the Acknowledgement Letter I received from yourselves. This must surely be a false allegation made by yourselves used as a bully boy technique to force me to pay an unfair penalty. The date of which this notice was issued is irrelevant to the “28 days of sending” as it is quite reasonable for documents to go missing in the post, especially when they are addressed to DVLA it would appear.

I still have some other points, but is there anything else you can see?!

Edited by Bignayf86
Link to post
Share on other sites

i too had this. i scrapped my car on 19th July 2009 and on the 20th July 2009, i decared SORN online. I had an e-mail confirmation of this. The same day i sent my log book to the scrap yard (as car was scrapped in another area) and i told DVLA this but they insist they have no record. unfortunatly, i dont have the e-mail address anymore for personal reasons. SO im just going to have to pay it anyway = £80 out my pocket for a car i dont have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a load of bull. I've got most of the paperwork and correspondance from start to finish so I will be fighting this all the way!

 

Ive just finished my Letter..

 

Dear Mrs Chadderton

 

 

I am still not happy with the response you have given me. Please let me point out a few facts in this matter. You refer to the documents needing to be “delivered” to the Secretary of State and not merely sent. I will quote section 7 of the Interpretation Act 1978 which does indeed cover this:

 

 

Where an Act authorises or requires any document to be served by post (whether the expression “serve” or the expression “give” or “send” or any other expression is used) then, unless the contrary intention appears, the service is deemed to be effected by properly addressing, pre-paying and posting a letter containing the document and, unless the contrary is proved, to have been effected at the time at which the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.”

 

 

In bold you will see that any other expression is used. Deliver is merely another expression. I have therefore fulfilled every obligation to send the necessary paperwork back to you, as soon as the letter was posted I have done everything in my power to get the document to you. I can ensure that it was posted before the road tax even ran out on the car in question.

 

 

You have also said that after looking at the recent record of M73TVX that no notification was made, please see enclosed with this letter a copy of the Acknowledgement Letter I received from yourselves. This must surely be a false allegation made by yourselves used as a bully boy technique to force me to pay an unfair penalty. The date of which this notice was issued is irrelevant to the “28 days of sending” as it is quite reasonable for documents to go missing in the post, especially when they are addressed to DVLA it would appear.

 

 

I would also like to add that I find it highly irresponsible and unprofessional to find that the penalty was passed to two separate debt collectors! I have enclosed copies of letters from each of these for your reference.

 

 

You state the “crux of the matter” is for me to provide evidence to indicate the DVLA received a disposal notification to support my claim; this is simply not true. The only legal obligation I have to yourselves is to send the V5C back to you, filling out the appropriate part, which I have done.

 

 

This matter is still in dispute and it should therefore remain with the DVLA until it has been resolved properly.

 

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in my case, the scrap dealer said they would do it to make sure its done and cus they cant do anything with the vehicle until they have a letter from DVLA confiming that the vehilce is theirs. Ive scrapped a vehicle before and that process was easy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...