Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles.
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4614 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I want to enforce a CCJ against someone using the transfer up service and then Marston group (which I am told are a leading enforcement agency). They say the transfer up service is free but they will charge if the recovery process is unsuccessful.

 

1) How/who/when decides the process is unsuccessful? And how can I be sure that they have used all means at their disposal to recover my money before coming back to charge me? How much can they charge me - the claimant?

 

2) In case they are unsuccessful, can I go back to the county court to use another method - attachment of earnings order, etc? Or do similar things exist in the high court?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I want to enforce a CCJ against someone using the transfer up service and then Marston group (which I am told are a leading enforcement agency). They say the transfer up service is free but they will charge if the recovery process is unsuccessful.

 

1) How/who/when decides the process is unsuccessful? And how can I be sure that they have used all means at their disposal to recover my money before coming back to charge me? How much can they charge me - the claimant?

 

2) In case they are unsuccessful, can I go back to the county court to use another method - attachment of earnings order, etc? Or do similar things exist in the high court?

 

Thanks in advance!

 

The company will agree with you how many visits they will make and what the charges are. This i know from personal experience.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

 

Have you taken leave of your sense's? if YES then GOODLUCK.

 

If NO, then

 

What the hell is wrong with the County Court Bailiffs,

 

Give us more information on the type of debt, and the debtor private or company etc.

 

EO will stitch for max amount of money if he cannot enforce.

 

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was told that EO is more aggressive in going after the debtor. debtor is my ex-landlord who has not paid back deposit. He is a professional landlord and I think with the market downturn he is having financial troubles and probably a lot of people after him...

 

The landlord should have your deposit in a separate account

 

I agree with Oh Boy's post, the correct route is the county court who as I understand it, because of the sum you are chasing, the county court would hand the debt to the High Court Enforcement Officer (HCEO for short). I'm sure Oh Boy will correct me if I'm wrong :)

 

I think that you take a great risk with private bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep,

 

There are many many enforcement options open to you, to use a private bailiff is a big risk Marstons being Drakes, this debt is tiny and not worth the hassle for them, they'll sit on it for a while and then turn to you for the money, they are in win win situation, your not, your debts will rise, lets face it, where is the landlord? what can be seized by the EO at the place, bugger all if you ask me.

 

I would go and get a Third Party Debt order and seize his bank account, or get an N61a issued from the court order for questioning etc, there are other enforcement procedures and options, stick a chrge on the house and then get a forced sale order, I hate landlords like that I once got done for £400.00 bloody thieves

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the candid response!

The landlord hasn't bothered to respond to court's summons before the order was made. So I am not sure if more summons from the court would budge him. If I issue a third-party order is the bank obliged to dig out all the accounts that the bank has for him? I ask because the account I used to pay rent in was closed and he changed it to a joint account later. (Smart move I guess since I cannot ask for an order against a joint account?)

I was tempted to use the HCEO option since I know he is working out of commericial premises of which he is the managing director. Perhaps the HCEO can sieze computers, etc? Perhaps I am being too naive so please do guide me. Also is the sherriff's office same as HCEO?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't have to be that property as it could be any property he owns. Don't forget that commercial leases count as property - you could make things difficult for him by getting a charging order on the lease where he runs his business. Depends on the term of the lease of course.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! Thats a really good idea. Can you please guide me how to go about it?

I am trying to find out what all he owns. I downloaded the title from land registry of the property where he operates his business but it is owned by some company - which i have no info about (perhaps it is owned by him/relatives?) Is there a way to get more details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi,

 

I am in a very similar situation to disappointed_london who started this thread, only I have already gone ahead and used the transfer up service with Marstons before reading this thread and finding out how likely it is they will just come back to me for the money.

 

So far have just paid the £60 cheque and got the letter from them confirming they have received the writ.

 

Is it possible to cancel at this point, and would you recommend it if it is?

 

Would be grateful for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I am in a very similar situation to disappointed_london who started this thread, only I have already gone ahead and used the transfer up service with Marstons before reading this thread and finding out how likely it is they will just come back to me for the money.

 

So far have just paid the £60 cheque and got the letter from them confirming they have received the writ.

 

Is it possible to cancel at this point, and would you recommend it if it is?

 

Would be grateful for any advice.

 

You'd be better off starting your own thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=168

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...