Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
    • Just be careful with your language on what you post here - Keep it above board Lets see what you send to the big boss. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Red Debt Collection Services and 3g Mobile


Shadowmaru
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This morning I received a letter from Red claiming I owe 3g Mobile £729.51. The thing is I've only ever had a 3g pay as you go mobile and the way my name is written on the letter has sent alarm bells ringing since I don't know how they got my middle initial since I never use it in any communications. The only thing that I have that has my name written on it like it is on this letter is my debit card. The only contract phone I have is with Orange and except for this months bill it's all up to date.

 

It says as I have failed to settle my outstanding balance. This is the first letter I have received from them.

 

What makes me laugh is they say if they do not hear from me by 18/02/09 then they will have to use other recovery methods. They apparently sent the letter out on the 13/02/09. And it's now the 19th. How am I...if I do... supposed to contact these people on that date? Use a flippen Delorean and go back a week and contact them?

 

I don't need this mess around with how my health has been getting worse over the last 6 months. I'm reduced to laying in bed most of the day since my back and legs have pratically died on me and I swear I'm going to be attracting metal objects soon with the amount of MRI's I've had.

My Neurologist doesn't know what's wrong with me yet and I really don't need this while going through blood tests, EMGs, MRI's and Nerve Biopsy's.

 

Another letter also arrived today for my brother from Red saying he also owed 3g money. Something doesn't smell right here. Two letters on the same day from the same company for the same thing?

 

Any help in dealing with these people would be appreciated.

Edited by Shadowmaru
Spelling Errors Ahoy!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the 'prove it' letter;

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account no:

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

**Edit to suit**

 

Remember, don’t sign the letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well... gotta give em something other to do than sending out threat-o-grams everyday. XD

 

Then again if what my poking around has turned up is true I doubt the "Leeds Losers" will even be able to manage that properly. XD

 

Still the Prove it letter is getting posted this afternoon as soon as I fire up the desktop and manage to hobble over to the desk. Gotta love back problems :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Update... Got a letter from Lowells this morning saying if I don't contact them by 8th of February they'll foward the debt to Red. Right... Bit late there mate. The letter was supposedly written on the 29th January. I think the post monkeys got confused when sending this one out. I sent an email asking what they were playing at. Going to be amused to see what I get back.

 

Still waiting on a reply from the letter I semt to Red...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update... Got a letter from Lowells this morning saying if I don't contact them by 8th of February they'll foward the debt to Red. Right... Bit late there mate. The letter was supposedly written on the 29th January. I think the post monkeys got confused when sending this one out. I sent an email asking what they were playing at. Going to be amused to see what I get back.

Still waiting on a reply from the letter I semt to Red...

 

Lowells/Red/Hampton Legal are all part of the same company...just desks on opposite sides of the room.

One threat monkey gets up out of his chair & walks over to the other side of the office to pass it to Red etc...:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they're on a fishing trip for someone with a similar name to you or your brother. This is exactly what Lowells have been on BBC Watchdog for - they'll have got your initial from someone like Experian while doing a search. They really are ****. It may well be worth you and your brother contacting Watchdog, especially as you are clearly in a vulnerable situation.

 

BBC - Watchdog

 

They'd love to hear from you, I'm sure, especially if they're concocting letters after the event.

 

Good luck with fighting the scabby swine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...