Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there   thank you for the reply. No, it's not a silly question at all. I am convinced I didn't hit anything with my car. I was going very slowly and it was the guy standing next to his lorry in the road who punched and kicked my car as I went by. It's cause I saw him do it in the mirror.  I initially thought he did it because he thought I was passing him maybe too closely whilst he was messing around with his lorry ?  That's why I stopped and got out and asked what he thought he was doing hitting my car. He then just hurled abuse at me. Not making any accusations such 'you hit me' 'you hit my lorry' or you did this or that. He just swore and shouted at me. At which point I said I would be making a complaint to his company for his threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I went to my car , got my phone to take a photo of his number plate but then he came towards me again and I thought if he now hits me I am going to come second. I am a woman in her mid 50s travelling on her own and this guy looked like a Millwall football supporter (short, rotund, skin head) so I decided to leave this situation. I got back in my car closed the door and drove off before he could reach me.  I later checked my phone and noticed the photo was too blurred, as I turned and rushed back to my car too quickly before the camera could focus. So I thought it was pointless making a complaint as the guy couldn't be traced anyway, so I forgot all about it until yesterday. But this is all I can think of, it must have to do with this incident as it is in the same street.   
    • Please read the following thread very carefully. It is extremely relevant where you are suing Evri on the basis of a contract which you originally made with Packlink who are domiciled in Spain. A judgement has been obtained and we have applied for transcript and it will be put up on this thread as soon as we receive it probably about the end of July. In the meanwhile, read this thread, see what has been discovered about the Packlink/Evri/customer relationship and look at the witness statement very carefully. It's a long thread but don't give up. Once you have the transcript of the judgement, then I will do a more careful and explanatory post here   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/459707-evri-lost-my-ebay-parcel-£844-court-claim-issued-judgment/
    • So if the breach occurred say Dec 2017 (first missed payment) and the default notice was issued Sept 2018 and the claim was issued 7th June 24 the claimant will of course be arguing it is within the limitation period (by 3 months)
    • Yep, I would  have brought up the other things like asking for their contract and receiving no response etc. but the mediation phone calls were rather short. Evri just said the contract was not with them (i said 1999 act response etc.) and the goodwill offer thing. Whole process took about 10 minutes in total. Seems like they don't even want to negotate in mediations anymore. "they're only given a certain amount that they can agree to in mediation per day" I mean its hard for me to say if thats the mediator paraphrasing or aa direct quote from evri I will look through that thread and share what I find, also for what its worth I also have everything I made for the previous claim WS and bundles etc. that I can tweak for this parcel, since it did go almost all the way to court and is a virtually identical case. that + this new stuff you shared above should be helpful to me
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Creation Consumer Finance claimform - old Fridge loan - struck out - they tried again - **WON+COSTS TWICE**


intree
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Thanks for that

 

None of the disclosures was made, apart from the Agreement - and Certificate of name change, they did not send a DN to the court but sent me a copy of one (as posted above) which did not allow the full clear days for remedy.

 

They ignored the CPR requests and also did not deal with the letter which was sent to the court, so don't know why they were ordered to reply, but was hoping to get this ended as soon as possible to be honest, but if you say don't then what is my next step in this matter and why would they not respond?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 472
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What you need to do is pursue your CPR requests - do the other side a letter, attach your cpr request to it - give them 7 days to provide the requested information if not tell them that you will make an application for an order requiring compliance. 7 days after your letter and assuming that they haven't complied make an application on an N244 for an order that they comply within 7 days and costs. Assuming that doesn't get the documents a further N244 this time applying for an order that they provide the docs within 7 days in default the claim is struck out and costs.

 

The other thing to say is that you need to have asked for a copy of the ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT as well as the notice. If you haven't then you need to add it to your letter chasing the cpr 31 request

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh right

 

I will check with the court tomorrow again as they stated they could not check as the system was down at 3pm, so will check again tomorrow at 09.30 and then send the letter, it appears that , may need to spend even more money to get this one out than anticipated.

 

How can they just ignore all orders etc and my requests and just be allowed to continue with a claim, I wrote to the court for a DJ to intervene as they did not put in their AQ until 09 February 2009, which was 3 months from the date allowed............... justice hey.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem, in my view, is that the court service now has to make money. If a DJ just makes a decision on the basis of a letter (even tho' s/he can) there is no fee...However on an N244 there is a fee.

 

As a general rule the only way that you can guarantee that the court will do something is by making an application on an N244 and paying the fee. Don't forget that if you succeed in an application you usually get your costs back from the other side.

 

In litigation time limits have always been "flexible" the CPR when it was introduced was supposed to tighten things up - and to be fair it did at first but as time has gone on its' reverted to the old system.

 

Unless an Order has an express sanction attached to it nothing terrible happens if you don't comply by the due date.

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just spoke to the Court, they have advised that they are to put the file to the DJ who issued the order and that they will get a Unless order/or may be struck out for non compliance as the matter has not been addressed.

 

So if this happens what happens with the amount I owe and can they claim against me again and again etc.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with this, once you have the strike out or Unless order you can copy it to them (or their successors) every time they try and claim again.

 

Or let them take you to court again and use the Strike Out and/or Unless order as part of the defence if they still push hard... that will make the judge open their eyes a bit...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just hope this will soon come to an end as they have been real bad in this claim, they dont seem to care about people and what problems they are going through.

 

Anway - through the CAG - I appear to have confronted every angle they have taken and just thank god that this site and the many kind people on here, continue from strength to strenght, as without this site I would be sitting here with a CCJ and even more harrasment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Costs - Assuming the case is struck out you are entitled to your costs of defending the claim - paid as LIP costs by the claimant.

 

I'll explain what you need to do once you know what's happening

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

I was called by the Court and advised that I should wait 7 days and then ask the court for the Files to be sent to the DJ which will be next Friday.

 

As soon as I ahve some new information/news Ill be back with that on this site.

 

Thanks for all your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just called the Court 20 Minutes ago for information, they have now decided that the claimant is not providing the information they were ordered to provide, the matter is to be put before the same DJ as before, we were advised that the course of action would be that which the DJ orders in writing within 7 days.

 

Just hoping this will be to Strike our of the claim or a unless order.

 

dont think it looks too good for them at the moment - but they are leaches and I am sure they will be back for more of a fight ......

 

any comments welcome as usual

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that sounds promising - the DJ won't order a strike out but you may well get an unless order - it'll save you the hassle of having to apply for it - perhaps it shows that sometimes my view of the County Court system can be too cynical

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

update

 

still waiting for Court to issue something (if at all) spoke to them on weds ref above.........will call them again next weds if nothing comes back with a written request that the file be placed before the DJ who made the order.

 

Any advice appreciated - thanks to the CAG I think I am now on top of most of these vile creditors, since my redundancy I have had a bit more time to deal with them - even though it costs a fair bit - hope it will be worth the effort in the end, so I can make a donation to the CAG instead of these leaches.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry too much - most courts seem to take a least a week from them passing a file to a DJ to them getting it back - then they've got to type it up...

 

Just give them a call, like you planned, on Weds and see what they say

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks IGNM - would it be worthwhile if I have not heard by wednesday to write to the Court to ask that the claim be put B4 the DJ, I just want this to go away as I have a few more I am trying to deal with and this appears to be the worst DCA of them all - AT THIS TIME - anyway!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage I would just give them a call on Weds

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just called Court, as nobody came back to me as they promised.

 

Spoke to the case manager and he advised that the file has not been sent for the attention of a Judge and is on hold awaiting the Claimants response, the manager advised that it can stay there for up to several weeks unless, the claimants discontinue or we ask for it in writing to be put before a Judge.

 

So we have been now asked to write to the Court to be put before the same judge as made the order, if we do not write in it will be put before any available Judge, who may just extend their time to allow a response again.

 

so we have taken their advise and written as follows - hope that this is correct, as we need to get this matter sorted out - hopefully soon.

 

We wish to advise the Court that based on the Order above; the Claimants have failed to respond to the request for information by 15 April 2009.

We wish to advise that this is a procedure the claimants are adopting in all matters; the Court will note that the Allocation Questionnaire had been put in 3 months late; again this was against the overriding objective of the Court.

Accordingly, please can this file be put before District Judge xxxxxxxxxxxx ? This matter can then be addressed under the Court’s overriding objective to allow the matter to proceed or be struck out without further complications, which the Claimants have continued to cause.

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DB, I wish I could afford the £75.00 as I would love to get rid of this one, but unfortunately I am unable to do so at the moment, The Courts just are not bothered by a LIP instead they let the claimant do and abuse the system, with no recourse to Justice...............of course unless you pay....£75.00

 

Surley if they (the Courts) could see the distress these DCA's cause by issuing defective claims and default notices, which the Courts then just sit on the fence with, the claims would be struck out with just a letter, but it appears that Money Talks!!

 

I will wait for a response for 7 days and then probably borrow some money off my brother and ask for a strike out, but there is no gurantee that this would be struck out even then, based on what the case manager was saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair - its' not cos your an LIP - the courts would be the same if you were a Solr. The courts work on application notices.

 

Don't forget that you may qualify for fee remission

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/195872-court-fees-remission.html

  • Haha 1

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

UPDATE

 

After waiting for a response to my letter of April 2009, I called the Court on Friday and they have now sent a Notice of SMALL CLAIMS HEARING.....!!

 

AS FOLLOWS

 

Take Notice that the SMALL CLAIM HEARING HAS BEEN RELISTED AND WILL NOW TAKE PLACE ON:

 

3 AUGUST NOT BEFORE 10.30 AM

 

At XXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX

 

When you should attend

 

2 hours has been allowed for the SMALL CLAIMS HEARING

 

Please note: this case may ve rreleased to another judge possibly at a different Court.

 

 

Now I am confused - the other side have failed to respond and I asked that the case be put before the DJ who made the order and this comes back.

 

What a waste of time and money.......the lenders can do and say as they please and still get away with it.

 

JUSTICE!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make an application on an N244 for an Order that they comply or are struck out

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...