Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Intended court action HELP


barrelly
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I received this this morning. this wasnt the one I sent a CCA to. It isn't Viking either as I thought it is Blair Oliver and Scott

 

NOTICE OF INTENDED COURT ACTION.

 

BOS v ME

due by 16/02/2009

Formal notice is hereby given that our client has instructed us to commence court proceedings against you without delay.

Papres are now being prepared for commencement of action through your local court to seek judgement agaist you.

If you are a homeower and do not pay the amount the court orders you to pay, we may then reapply to the court for a charging order on your property. (I am private rent) This will give us repayment of the outstanding dept from the proceedings whenever the property is sold.

 

HELP!!!!!!!!!! WHAT DO I DO NOW AND WHAT LETTER DO I SEND THEM

 

By the way this dept was a bank loan taken out appox 2005/6

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Your Reference:

Client reference:

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to you, as it is in dispute with ***DCA*** and has been since ***Date***

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998

 

 

As ***DCA*** is now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, Office of Fair Trading Collection Guidelines and s10 Data Protection Act request, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

 

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default, enforcement action is NOT permitted; under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to ***DCA*** for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as ***DCA*** cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If ***DCA***chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

 

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Barrelly, don't worry about it. We all get one of those ;)

 

They send them out by the thousand a month.

 

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t42/davey77_2007/5copy.jpg

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Davy, we all seem to get the same crap sent to us eh!

How things change eh, a wouldn't have been saying that the letters were crap 2 weeks ago, I was pulling my hair out with worry.

Dare I say that I still haven't heard anything after sending them a CCA letter, which they received on the 18th Feb. Still early though.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi guys,

 

Not posted in a wee while, but will make this as short as poss.

CCA`d this debt back in Feb, it has since been past to another 2 differant DCA`s, which I sent both a BEMUSED LETTER from site.

This morning I received this;

 

RE xxxx Bal xxxxxx

 

Bla bla bla, We have been advised from xxxxxxx, a copy of the aggreement is unavailable, xxxxxx have written to you already to advise this (NO THEY HAVEN`T) however, we have re-ordered this for you.

We cannot return this account to xxx as thier time has expired and we are now dealing with it.

 

I trust the above responce has now resolved your disput.

 

We have placed the account on hold till xxx June, and request you make immediate contact to discuss a repayment proposal.

 

 

Thats it, what do you all think. Have I won this 1 (sort off) ior am I jumping the gun abit to quickly. NO aggreement, no payment right!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am far from an expert, but I would say that no CCA then the debt is un-enforceable.

 

If the agreement (and it must be the orginal not a copy) is unavailable then they have no evidence of what you agreed to, if you agreed or the terms and conditions of any agreement.

 

Just my twopenneth worth!

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going with what is on here MONX I agree with you. No agreement no debt.

 

Do you think that I should just ignore this letter (am getting good at that) or send them I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THIS DEBT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send another letter to them saying that they can put your account on hold all they want but, until they provide the original agreement with all the terms and conditions the debt is unenforceable and that you will not be entering into any further correspondence with them until or if they can produce this.

 

I would keep all correspondance just in case! Having no evidence of a debt, proof you owe it or the correct paperwork hasnt stopped DCA's from trying enforce these things through the court.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys,

This is the story in short.

Origanily I CCA`d IQOR, they sent back my £1.00 PO, saying they where NO longer dealing with this account.

 

Weeks later I got a letter from Wescot, demanding the same money as IQOR was wanting, I then sent them the £1.00 PO for the CCA, the account was then put on hold as they could NOT find 1.

 

Months pasted, I then receive a letter from Moorcroft, yes wanting the same money s the other 2 DCA`s.

I wrote to them stating that it was STILL in dispute with Wescot, so return this account to them. That I do NOT accept this debt.

In return I have received a letter, stating that they could not return it to Wescot as there time had expired and they were dealing with this account. The £1.00 PO that was sent to Wescot for the CCA has now been credited to this account as payment.

I wrote a second letter stating that it was ONLY for the CCA that can not be found, so return it forewith.

All my letters are recorded so I know that they have received them, but they seem to be ignoring the contents of what I put in them.

Again I received a letter stating that they acknowledge receipt of my £1.00 payment, and to contact ASAP for a repayment of the ballance.

 

Can anybody come up with a letter that they would understand.

 

Any help please!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £1.00 PO that was sent to Wescot for the CCA has now been credited to this account as payment.

I wrote a second letter stating that it was ONLY for the CCA that can not be found, so return it forewith.

Tht ais why the current CCA request letter in the temolpates library contains the sentences

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

I presume that you are thinking of the time before it becomes SB.

 

You could try telling them that

The £1.00 was the statutory fee for your CCA request and may not be taken as a payment. As they could not provide the CCA, the statutory fee must be returned. Failure to do so will be reported to the FOS & OFT.

 

You know the facts. They probably won't chase for 5 years now (thinking that there has been a payment) and when they do, just remind them that the £1 was the statutory fee and you didn't make a payment into the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the coments 2Grumpy

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

this was clearly marked on my CCA request.

Have written to them quoting this and to return my £1. They are ignoring this request. Could it be because this was sent to Wescot

 

I presume that you are thinking of the time before it becomes SB.

What do you mean before it becomes SB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...