Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

7 weeks out of date


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5617 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my daughter has her head down the toilet being sick right now. why i would say its the Doritos sour cream and chives that she bought today from our local supermarket the sell by date is 3rd December 08 very

unhappy about this i phoned there head office expecting an apology at the very least no apology didn't even want to know where the shop was all they said was has she still got her receipt (yes) well when she stops being sick tell her to take it back for a refund customer services what costumer service :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reported this to the manufacturer im sure that they will not be pleased that there products are being sold out of date.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are these the sort that are just crisps or is there a sour cream dip thing as well? Crisps have a best before, not a use by normally, the difference is that with a use by it is considered unsafe to eat after the date because it could make you ill (this often applies to dairy and other perishables) but best before dates usually mean it's safe to eat after the date but may not be as nice (e.g. biscuits might be soggy). Could you clarify what you mean by the "sell by" date as that doesn't exist.

 

If they are selling food after a use by it is illegal (AIUI, it is not illegal to sell after a BBD) and so they should be dealing with it seriously - even though mistakes occasionally can happen which lead to older stock staying on the shelves. She really should have checked the date on the stock though - I always do, sometimes if you're buying stuff to eat in the next few days you don't want it to go o/d early!

 

You also have to be sure it's the doritos she ate which caused it and not a stomach bug - it's the time of year when norovirus seems to go around a lot which causes the same symptoms as food poisoning, i.e. puking and the runs.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any of it left?

If there is put it into a plastic container - or plastic cup which has been sterilised with boiling water and put it in the freezer labeled with the time and date.

 

Even a tiny residual sample should be stored away in a feezer.

Naturally, keep the original container, label and tioll receipt.

 

Get your daughter to write a statement of exactly what happened. Do that now with time and date. Store it away.

If it was not she who bought the item then get a full statement from the person who did - right now, timed and dated.

 

Visit the shop. See if they have any other items there which are also beyond their sell-by date. Take good pictures of as much as you can - cl;ose ups of dates - before the shop staff stop you.

 

Which shop is it?

Better still, divide it into two or three samples and store them in the way that I have described.

 

Write a letter of complaint to trading standards describing eactly what happened.

What was the shop? Small independent? or a chain?

 

She must go to the doctor immediately. Get an examinattion and tell the doctor exactly what happened. you will probably need a doctor's report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

best before 3/12/08 it was a dip i know its not food poison. Worked as a cook for years so know all about that. she is probably being sick at the thought of it. Its the customer service attitude that cheesed me off not even I'm sorry or which one of our shops did you by it in so we can get in touch with them to check there stock nothing but i will be writing a letter to there head office to complain about it

it was a somerfield supermarket

Edited by hallowitch
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

it is actually the crisps or the dip? if it is the crisps it is highly unlikely that it will be them that are causing this sickness, however, if it is the dip then that is another story alltogether.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

best before 3/12/08 it was a dip i know its not food poison. Worked as a cook for years so know all about that. she is probably being sick at the thought of it. Its the customer service attitude that cheesed me off not even I'm sorry or which one of our shops did you by it in so we can get in touch with them to check there stock nothing but i will be writing a letter to there head office to complain about it

it was a somerfield supermarket

IANAL but if it's a best before they aren't doing anything wrong (but the dip is a different matter - it should be packed with a UBD not a BBD).

 

It may not be the dip though... it could be psychological or norovirus or something else. They'd probably need to test a sample of the food and her puke to be sure.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is the offence of selling food not of the nature, substance or quality demanded (Food Safety Act, s.14 off the top of my head). As FC has pointed out, it is OK to sell food beyond its best before date, but this should be drawn to your attention, otherwise the offence could be committed.

 

Do as BF says in storing it and report to Traing Standards or Environmental Health (some local authorities combine them or they cover the same area). They may want a sample, though they may also refuse on the grounds that since purchase, it has become contaminated (the standard practice is to purchase an item form the seller and test that item). But certainly report it. It shows a lack of proper procedures in place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...