Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds are being heavy handed have they acted unlawfully advice please.


jwus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5600 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

This is my first post i have been reading the site on and off for a few months now and very impressed with the information available. I have been trying to deal with my debt issues alone by writing to the banks with requests to make reduced payments this has got me nowhere so i decided to join the ranks of those who bite back!

 

I won't go into too much personal detail but i suffered the bereavement of parent to cancer last year . I was not at all focused on my business and subsequently got into difficulties closing the business at the end of 2008. All of my debt is personal rather than business debt as i was a sole trader. I tried to sell my home to solve debt crisis but despite being on the market for the majority of last year and subsequent price reductions i was unable to achieve a sale. At current value a sale with the secured debt against it would result in negative equity.

 

In my naivety or stupidity (you decide ;-)) i thought being honest and up front with my creditors would be the best way forward during the short-term difficulties and for the main part i have had some positive responses and have been able to broker reduced payments although they are still adding interest. But Lloyds have been DISGRACEFUL. I had banked with Lloyds for over 10 years had been a great customer forever taking out loans and paying them back early (including unqueried PPI) and due to easy going nature forever lining their pockets with charges made to my account and i never once considered applying for these back but since i got into difficulties they have acted horrendously i would now like the opportunity to do so.

 

I have two bank accounts, one loan and and a credit card with LLoyds.

 

I wrote to them back in October 2008 explaining that i would be unable to meet my credit card and loan payments and would they be kind enough to accept reduced payments whilst i was on Job Seekers Allowance and looking to return to work i explained that i only required reduced payments for a few months to see me through difficult period of collapse of buiness death of mother and until back in F/T employment. They wrote back to me saying the accounts were up to date and therefore they couldn't deal with me. Just a couple of days later they then went on to take my loan payment and credit card payments out of my current account forcing me over my overdraft limit and they have been charging me £20 unauthorised borrowing a day ever since! nearly £1,000 to date and rising!!!!!.

 

I haven't been answering any of their phonecalls but i have written to them recorded delivery several times offering reduced payments.

 

They ignored these and kept writing to me as though i hadn't made any contact at all increasing interest rates threats and levying charges.

 

I wrote back to them at the beginning of January 2008 citing sections 14.1 and 14.2 of the banking code that they deal with me sympathetically and saying i will put in a complaint with the Financial Services Ombudsmen unless they deal with the content of my letters and acknowledge my attempts to contact them in an attempt to find a soluton.

 

In my letters to Lloyds credit card (based on accurate budget i had enclosed to them) I offered them under £10 a month until circumstances improved.They then wrote back to me paying lip service to sections 14.1 and 14.2 of the banking code that they were doing all they could to help me in line with my letter and would accept my offer of £924 pcm! They then drew up a payment schedule of when it would be required by.

 

They then wrote to me since saying i failed to meet the detailed plan of £924pcm they had kindly put in place for me?!? They have no choice but to default me and i firstly received a default and then a notice of enforcement.

 

Out of all of my creditors they have been the trickiest bast***s by far. They seem to have set me up to streamline me for default and notice of enforcement despite my efforts a brokering a solution with them. I have a very strong feeling that they are looking for an opportunity to fast track this debt against my house which is why they wouldn't negotiate with my reasonable and well intentioned offers of reduced payment in the short-term and have gone directly to default.

 

This is where i would truly appreciate some advice. In response to the hideous way they've dealt with me i now want to SAR and CCA them.

 

What i've paid them in charges over the years probably outweighs the amounts they are chasing me for so i sent off the SAR and CCA's but I have the following and very real concerns that i need answered.

 

1. My unauthorised overdraft debt is rising by £20 a day I have been defaulted and received a notice of enforcement. Am i better to let this go to court with the view of gaining a CCJ where interest is stopped and have the judge approve a payment plan in line with my available income OR when the SAR comes through put in request for return of charges. My worry is (heard this through debt agency)that if it goes to court whilst i'm querying the charges the judge is unlikely to approve any reduced payment plan and the debt will remain being charged at £20 per day unauthorised fees for God knows how long.

 

So please advise whether i can do both at the same time or do i have to follow one course of action?

 

2. As i notified Lloyds of my financial problems whilst within my overdraft limit and they continued to take money out of current account after i had notified them forcing me into the unauthorised fee bracket could this be deemed an 'abusive action' by Lloyds as cited in the FAQ section of this site and if so what action can i take?

 

3. In my earlier letters to Lloyds (recorded delivery) offering reduced payment on the debt, i have acknowledged the debt and i am therefore fearful that my acknowledgement would this overide any lack of a valid CCA on their behalf. Is this the case?

 

4. Also i have had my credit card with them for over 10 years was originally a visa last year they split my original 15k card limit in two with 7.5k on the original visa and they also gave me a mastercard with 7.5k on as well. I only had the agreement for one card with them and now they are applying interest and charges double bubble on the two separate cards are they allowed to do this?

 

I am absolutely appalled at what they have done. Since i approached them asking for leniancy they have showed no mercy and used it as an opportunity to exacerbate my difficulties by increasing interest and charges as much as they could. As such would really like to take some strong action against them and really appreciate and advice you may have as to whether the CCA route is still open to me.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jwus, welcome to CAG.

 

Hopefully I can bump this up for you, then someone with more knowledge can answer your questions.

 

My understanding is if Lloyds take you to court, the charges stop as they are claiming an amount of x.

 

I can't comment on what the debt agency have told you, but I can't see the reasoning behind it.

 

Good luck

LTSB court date 25/7/07

17/7/07 I WON I WON I WON!!!!:p :grin:

HSBC court date 11/9/07 (stayed)

CapOne lba 7/1/08-15/3/08 WON.

Citicards lba 14/1/08

 

Read Read and Read Some:razz: More

 

If I've been helpful in anyway please tip my scales:rolleyes:

 

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Seek the advice of an insured qualified professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...