Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case.    You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
    • Hi,    I will look over your case shortly.   I am sorry for the delay.
    • Judges are now loaded and they are both deputies 😕
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What do you make of this?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5611 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have CCA'd Cap One for my partner and I, they have responded with the usual rubbish for me, T&C that don't apply to my account, no agreement, no signature, nothing.

 

I wrote back saying this is not acceptable and I need a 'true copy' of my agreement. I received the following response:

 

Thank you for writing back to me about your request for us to provide you with a true copy of your credit agreement. I'm afraid I wont be able to send any different documentation to support your request.

 

As I've already explained, in accordance with section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Consumer Credit (cancellation notices and copy documents) regulations 1983, we've provided you with a copy of your original agreement, and if any terms have been varied, then the copy agreement will include the updates terms. In addition, your personal details, the signature box, signature and date of signature were omitted from the copy provided as permitted under regulation 3 of the Consumer Credit(cancellation and notices regulations 1983.

 

Your account remains in default, blah, blah

 

It is important that that you maintain payments as your account balance consists of transactions that you have made...what the hell does this mean???

 

We will continue to pursue the outstanding debt and will defend any application you may wish to bring against us.

 

And a little bit with regards to this is their final response on the matter.

 

Have they got nothing? I made a very small payment yesterday (£6.00 on a 3.5K debt). Should I just stop paying all together? Any advice would be appreciated.

 

They did also send a letter to say that my account was still being handled by Capital One. This makes me think that they have nothing enforceable to sell on...any thoughts?

 

My partners Cap One account is being handled by Capquest and when they responded to the CCA request they provided the application form with his sig, no t&cs etc. I wrote to Capquest telling them that an application form was not acceptable and I needed a 'true copy'. Soon after my partner received the exact same letter as me with this added:

 

Whilst we are not required to provide a copy of the signature page, I have now done so as supporting evidence. As you can see this has been signed by both yourself and Cap One.

 

Enclosed was the same copy of the application form, which states:

 

 

CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT AGREEMENT

credit card agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974

Please issue to me a capital one credit card and pin. I authorise c o to search the files of any cra. The cra with record details of CO search and amy application. You may also add to my record with cra details of how i conduct my co account (including defaults). I confirm that all the information i have given is true and complete. I understand that this information wiull be checked with fpa and if I give you false or inaccurate information and you suspect fraud you will record this.

 

CO and other org may use and search these records to:

 

Then details of the procedure

 

I have read the terms and conditions setting out the agreement with CO and if my application is accepted, I agree to be bound by these t&cs, as amenede from time to time. I am over 18 yeras of age.

 

Credit scoring - CO uses a technique known as credit scoring in deciding whether to open an Account in your name and if so, what credit limit you will be given. CO will also use this technique throughout the life of the agreement to assess your credit limit and the interest rate and other charges to be applied to the account, all of which may be varied.

 

then a bit about sharing information which does state 'please read use of information overleaf (section 23 of agreement)

 

A box with a copy of their signature

 

and a box with mine stating:

 

This is a credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Sign only if you want to be legally bound by its terms.

 

signed and dated by my partner.

 

So, I bit the bullet and paid them £6.00 yesterday as well (on a 4.5k debt)

 

Today, my partner receives two letters from Capquest, one saying his account is on hold for 28 days and the other:

 

On 2 December 08, Capquest received your CCA request...blah

 

On 7 January, Capquest received your copy of agreement from Cap One this was sent to you on the same day.

 

The copy of the agreement that has been supplied to you advises that it is a credit agreement reglulated by the consumer credit act 1974. It also clearly shows in the signature box 'this is a credit agreement regulated by the CCA 1974, sign it only if you want to be legally bound by its terms.

 

The copy of agreement would have been sent to you by Cap One when your credit card was issued and consequently you would have had every opportunity to raise any issues with Cap One. Capquest are satisfied that the copy of tagreement supplied is legally sufficient under the CCA act 1974.

 

Unfortunately Capquest are still awaiting the t&c and statements from Cap One. These will be sent to you in due course.

 

I can confirm that your account will not be forwarded to any third parties and no further action will be taken against you whilst your request is outstanding. Howvere, Capquest are under no obligation to cease interest (they have) on your account nor are we obliged to remove your data from their files inclusive of any defaults on your credit file applicable to the above account and at this stage will not be doing so.

 

I would also like to confirm that in the unlikely event Capquest are unable to supply the relevant documentation to your self with the required timescales of the CCA act 1974. This does not mean that your debt ceases to exist, nor does it mean that Capquest would have to close your account and remove any data held on file for yourself. It would mean that Capquest are unable to enforce your outstanding debt until such a time you were in receipt of relevent documentation.

 

I am sorry to go on, you have probably lost the will to live reading this but I don't have the facility to scan the letters.

 

To recap:

 

Thoughts on no agreement, new t&cs and the letter above on me

Thoughts on my partner 'agreement' and the letter from Capquest

Should I just bite the bullet and pay them £6.00 a month?

 

Many thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan in the agreement you have and post it up minus any personal info so you can get opinions.

We like to see the goods!;¬)

Start your reading here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/105315-my-agreement-enforceable-useful.html#post1005260, while waiting for opinions.

A newbie, only offering general commentary.

Get stuck contact the site team.

If you do not get a reply within 48 hours send a PM, with a link to the relevant thread, to any Site Team Member.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

Just a thought. Have you got a digital camera? If so, problem solved

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

The copy of the agreement that has been supplied to you advises that it is a credit agreement reglulated by the consumer credit act 1974.
Yes it is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act which is why the copy of the agreement is completely unenforceable.

 

Personally I would pay them nothing more and tell them to berger off.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's never guaranteed a creditor doesn't hold a proper agreement somewhere after the first initial 'this is all we have' letter but when they start quoting cancellation notices and copy documents regulations 1983, that should raise suspicions that they are trying to fob you off hoping you won't go on to ask for an original fully executed and signed agreement.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's never guaranteed a creditor doesn't hold a proper agreement
Unless of course it's Cap One.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...