Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • don't get too hung up on the real meaning of 'fake' in terms of the documents a claimant might produce relating to a potential court claim. by fake we typically mean, they are not obviously the 'real McCoy' ,100% associated with whatever credit they are trying to pin on punters. they are often of the right 'version' that an OC would have used for that particular take out date, but with details inserted in a diff font where they should be for say your name address DOB etc. All DCA's typically  have filing cabinets covering each year for most creditor, whip 'em out, scan and copy n paste your details onto them, even easier now with online sign ups. no hard copies ever sent cause 90% of mugs have lost them..... one of our most powerful tools is the fact any docs they produce, unless they state they are 'a reconstruction'  MUST come from the original creditor noty some hidden pile the claimants have. Link are absolute masters at this so dont stick to lowell threads. dx    
    • Driving home last night I contacted wing mirrors with a car coming the opposite way. The wing mirror folded in and the glass popped out. Very minor damage.  I stopped at the next layby (A road) to repair the mirror. A passerby stopped and said they saw the other car stopped behind me in another layby - they went back and passed over details so we could get in touch.  The conversation started cordially, but quickly got heated when I said I was well on my side and they drifted over (which is what happened).  I wasn't going to bother filing a claim as there isn't enough damage to justify it. So I've said to the other party lets just call it quits as there are no witnesses and we both think we are innocent.   they said they are contacting the police and insurance and that they have witnesses. But a quick facebook search found a post by the other person saying they were in a crash, and were 'spun' off the road. Picture of a broken wing mirror and a slight scuff on the front and rear wheel arch. they are asking for witnesses. I have screenshots of the post, and sent them another message saying I can see you dont have witnesses as you are appealing for them. I'd really not drag this out. Lets call it quits and move on. this was followed by a couple of messages that didn't really make much sense. e.g. 'do the right thing'. What should I do now?  Contact police?  Contact my insurance? - Can I tell them about this incident but say I dont want to claim? Will that affect my premium?  
    • So this is the crux of the argument. The scrappage contribution should have also been counted as a deposit. It was literally a part exchange in return for a cash deduction so there is no reason it wouldn't be treated the same way.  I did not request a VT, I was struggling to pay after a separation from my partner at the time. However had the figures been reflected correctly, the VT cost would have been 2k not 9k and I may have considered it as an option. Instead, the car was marked stolen and removed from my possession by the police
    • LOL - old one the fiver theory - although with the poops its take a fiver now, promise 10p  sometime in the future while claiming the reverse theory   So when is jenrick, an apparent slam dunk as referenced higher in the thread, being referred to the police? These poops need to know that anything they throw will be returned .. with interest  
    • Yup, it isn't a criminal case, it's hard to prove, but take a detailed look at my thread to see how many holes there are in what they have sent me, there is a picture building.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Falling behind on credit cards


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5609 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

This is a fantastic forum. I've spent hours reading last night and today.

 

I have seven credit cards totalling over £16k plus an overdraft of £650 and am self-employed. Due to lack of work lately, I'm one month in arrears on all of the cards and am not certain what to do next. I'm a private tenant with no savings. Although I've been making minimum repayments for months, I can no longer even meet those.

 

I have two options to bring my income back up to par with where it was: get more work (working on this) or get a job. There are vacancies available in my area for which I'm qualified and which would allow me to begin making repayments well over the minimum on the cards. Obviously there's a lead time associated with both options and due to a commercial lease, I prefer the first (defaulting on the lease might finish me depending on the landlord's leniency and keeping it while employed is madness).

 

My first step, I think, is a CCA request to all the cards - worth seeing if any weren't handled correctly on day one.

 

Will these requests cause me any problems with creditors bringing forward action of any kind? I have the letters ready to go based on the template on this forum.

 

Is there a specific department the CCA requests should go to in each creditor organisation? Registered office? Customer services?

 

I'm getting numerous phone calls to home, work and mobile every day from two creditors (HFC Marbles and Citi) but not answering them. I got a single text from Barclaycard telling me I am in arrears. Should I try to combine the "harassment letters" and CCA request letters into one for those who're being a pain or just ignore it for now (I've set up call blocking on my lines - no point being asked repeatedly for what I don't have)?

 

And finally, should I be sending token payments to each card to show that I'm not just ignoring the issue? Should I say anything about those at this stage in my letters? Maybe I should send a request to freeze interest and accept token payments until I increase income again right away rather than wait for the CCA requests to come back?

 

Lots of questions but I'm feeling much better having read a lot of the material here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and welcome to the site,

 

A cca request is your legal right, your creditors cant act differently with you.

 

Token payments are always a good idea as it shows willing, not that you wont pay you just cant.

Have you thought about putting together an income and expenditure form to send to your creditors? So they can see the difficulty you are in. They will usually require this if you are offering them a smaller amount.

 

Also there is no harm in asking creditors to freeze interest.

 

IGNORE phone calls only deal with creditors in writing. I did that for so long.

 

There are template letters on this site for various aspects, have a look in there and you may find some letters you can draft?

 

Try not to panic, you are aware you are in trouble and doing your best. Have you thought about calling National debt line they are very good at dealing with this sort of thing (also templates on there) they were the first port of call for me a year or so ago, i then went onto a debt management plan via Payplan in which they took over my finances and wrote to creditors on my behalf offering them token payments. They were very helpful.

 

No doubt someone else will be along with further advice.

 

Best of luck :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...