Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Any experience with DRG legal dept?


yesitisme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5550 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It looks like we will not resolve our differences and a failed computer will be taking myself and DSG retail to court.

 

My gut feeling several months on is that the (maybe unwritten) policy is to make any complaint processing as difficult as possible, wear you down and eventually you will go away. This applies to both the shop and cust services dept. The legal department prefer to bully with their superior knowledge of the law...

 

I just wonder if anyone has experience of taking them all the way to sitting in front of a judge?

 

-

 

As an interesting addition to this post my daughter had a very interesting conversation with a PC world employee in a shared taxi.... he said it was company policy to sell computers and not tell the customer that they would need to buy plugins etc to do what they required as once they had bought the computer and found out they needed another gismo they would be back and have to buy it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How has the computer failed?

he said it was company policy to sell computers and not tell the customer that they would need to buy plugins etc to do what they required as once they had bought the computer and found out they needed another gismo they would be back and have to buy it.
Or simply return the goods as not fit for purpose as in Durkin v DSG Retail Ltd.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like we will not resolve our differences and a failed computer will be taking myself and DSG retail to court.

 

My gut feeling several months on is that the (maybe unwritten) policy is to make any complaint processing as difficult as possible, wear you down and eventually you will go away. This applies to both the shop and cust services dept. The legal department prefer to bully with their superior knowledge of the law...

 

I just wonder if anyone has experience of taking them all the way to sitting in front of a judge?

 

-

 

As an interesting addition to this post my daughter had a very interesting conversation with a PC world employee in a shared taxi.... he said it was company policy to sell computers and not tell the customer that they would need to buy plugins etc to do what they required as once they had bought the computer and found out they needed another gismo they would be back and have to buy it.

 

 

Can i actually ask what you problem is and why you are wanting to take them to court?

 

Also as what that pc world member of staff said does not really make any sense. If I machine was miss sold to the person then they can take can simply take the machine back and get a refund. Plus i have no idea what you mean by pluggins? As if it software then there is free alternative software to all the major brands (anti virus, security programs, office appliactions, burning software etc) on the internet and all computers come with the same basic hardware so that makes no sense either, and if it is addition hardware like printers and scanner then you have to be pretty foolish not to realise that a computer can not do them without another bit of kit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the computer has failed and they have the requested engineers report to back it up. I feel that I have done all they have asked and they still keep dragging their feet and making it more challenging. There comes a point when you have to stand your ground. Thanks for the previous court case info, it is all good stuff when trying to put a case together. Any more stuff like that will be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the computer has failed and they have the requested engineers report to back it up. I feel that I have done all they have asked and they still keep dragging their feet and making it more challenging. There comes a point when you have to stand your ground. Thanks for the previous court case info, it is all good stuff when trying to put a case together. Any more stuff like that will be gratefully received.

 

well saying the computer has failed does not really help me, what is wrong with it, does it not turn on, does it not boot up, does it keep blue screening, will it not connect to the internet, has the optical drive failed, do the usb ports not work etc etc. How old is the machine? do you have the extended warranty? what have both you and them done to sort the problem out? and now where is the disagreement? In some situation pc world are well with in their rights to ask you to get and independent report done on the machine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had several experiences with DSG (and beaten 'em before court on all occasions). They are renowned for their hostility, vehemence, and as you say, "bearing down". They do however have a tendency to relent at the last second - if you know what you are doing.

 

In court, it will, or should, be acknowledged what you are up against. If they cannot demonstrate that their actions are reasonable, such as responding to queries within a reasonable length of time, keeping you updated, providing correct info, then they will more likely fail - a judge will not be sympathetic to them usually.

 

Keep a list of all contacts you have had, all correspondence, telephone calls, including names, dates, times etc. You can put an anonymised summary here if you want and we can guide you through the legal bits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I was not too clear, I am happy with the technical aspects of the case and have had proffessional advice to get me to this point. I am looking for experiences other people have had in case I end up in a room with me, DSG and a circuit judge. I am happy to post any outcome win or lose, also with detials of the soap opera assocciated with it... I just don't want to jepordise any further progress by identifying myself with details. If I was DSG legal department or customer services dept this site would be the first thing I would get the office junior to check each day!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason we ask for details, is because you could stand to win, or lose varying upon what you situation with DSG is.

 

For example, if your computer is over a year old, they have every right to ask for an independant engineers report. Taking them to court over this will surely result in you losing the case. The same can be said for accidental damage, where the fault is proven to rest with you... and well, you get the picture.

 

On the other hand, if you've been into store, rang the customer services line, and sent letters to head office in hemel via recorded delivery, and still no action has been taken. And they're not playing by the book, then you stand a very high chance of success in court, provided you've got the evidence to back your claims up.

 

DSG rarely let things get to the legal stage, I should know, I work for them. They always back down at the last second if they are even slightly in the wrong. So I doubt there are many people on here who've been in a courtroom with them. If they've actualy agreed to go to court and not caved in, I'd be pretty worried, because they must be 100% sure they're in the right, and be able to back it up. For the cost of a new computer, usualy it isn't worth their time and money to go to court.

Edited by Renzokuken

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow i am glad that someone got the reason why i actually asked for a bit more info, one reason is becuase i like to hear horror stories about dsg and secondly becuase you actually might be wasting your time and money by going to court and there are plenty of people on this forum that know a lot about consumer law who could actually tell you if you had a case.

 

also the excuse that you do not want to go into any detail in case DSG checked this website is a pretty poor one as they have no way of poving who you are unless you start using your real name, start listing and start listing things that are unique to your case .

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have already had reports of such trolls on here. And the OP is not asking for legal advice - merely what DSG sols are like. It is quite feasible to presume that the OP has got as far as they can without having to resort to court, and therefore does not require legal advice.

 

Further, the OP is free to publish as much or as little information as required, if any at all. It is not a requirement to put details on these forums. Even if the OP does need advice, it is not for CAG or its members to seek to put this forum as the sole guardian of advice. The lack of provision of advice based on the lack of detail provided may possibly be a detriment, but that is the OPs choice.

 

Now can we please try to give our experiences (if any) rather than trying to bully the OP into a unwanted revelation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gyzmo once more, and spot on.

 

I feel that the specific facts relating to this case would easily identify me and may put me at a possible disadvantage. I have too much time, money and effort wrapped up in this to consider any disclosure at this point.

 

I am very grateful for any experience folk can pass on if they have completed this journey and I will be more than willing to pass on my experiences when I have reached some kind of resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

so if it is company policy to not tell the buyer they might need plug-ins to do things . this is illegal? i dont think so.

 

you buy a computer. they sell you a computer. if you ask for a computer and a printer, they sell you a computer and printer.

 

its up to the customer to tell the shop what you want. they are not psychic.

 

computers can do wonderful things, or just basic things. it all depends on your needs.

 

if you said you wanted a computer that can handle printing photos and going on the internet. and they supply you with a computer with enough ram to handle the antivirus and music downloading software most people use today. and the computer can take a usb ported printer. job done.

 

you asked for a computer.. they gave you a computer.

 

if i bought a car and wanted it to do 100mph in 6 seconds. theyll find me one. its up to me to realise i need a driving licence, tax, insurance, and petrol and a non police patrolled, on speed camera'd road to do that in.

 

think about it...

 

i hope your not trying to sue because they not tell you that you need to have an electric supply to run the pc or a printer to do printing, i mean .. come on... common sense...

 

they could spend hours checking that you have a house, with electric, and a vacent electric socket or two to use it on. also to ask you about each piece of software in the world you might need. each type of printer, each desk to put it on, each computer chair, each time of paper tto use on printer, each type of internet,

 

maybe you should have listed your demands at time of purchase better they aint psychic, the sales guys aint even technically trained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so if it is company policy to not tell the buyer they might need plug-ins to do things . this is illegal? i dont think so.

 

you buy a computer. they sell you a computer. if you ask for a computer and a printer, they sell you a computer and printer.

 

its up to the customer to tell the shop what you want. they are not psychic.

 

computers can do wonderful things, or just basic things. it all depends on your needs.

 

if you said you wanted a computer that can handle printing photos and going on the internet. and they supply you with a computer with enough ram to handle the antivirus and music downloading software most people use today. and the computer can take a usb ported printer. job done.

 

you asked for a computer.. they gave you a computer.

 

if i bought a car and wanted it to do 100mph in 6 seconds. theyll find me one. its up to me to realise i need a driving licence, tax, insurance, and petrol and a non police patrolled, on speed camera'd road to do that in.

 

think about it...

 

i hope your not trying to sue because they not tell you that you need to have an electric supply to run the pc or a printer to do printing, i mean .. come on... common sense...

 

they could spend hours checking that you have a house, with electric, and a vacent electric socket or two to use it on. also to ask you about each piece of software in the world you might need. each type of printer, each desk to put it on, each computer chair, each time of paper tto use on printer, each type of internet,

 

maybe you should have listed your demands at time of purchase better they aint psychic, the sales guys aint even technically trained.

 

Errrrm.. her issue was with a broken computer, not a mis-sold one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to address that point, if I want to buy a computer and state I want it to do such and such, then I would expect the computer sold to be capable of that without the need of buying further equipment. It would otherwise be like buying a car and told "oh you want a steering wheel? That's extra". But yeah - completely off topic...

Link to post
Share on other sites

really i remember one computer being sold as wireless capable on the fact it had usb ports to plug an adaptor in (adaptor sold seperatly) thought it twas cheeky at the time

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...