Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hitachi Finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband purchased a hot tub in 2006 and the finance was arranged through Hitachi Capital.

 

After requestung a copy of the loan agreement and details of any insurance added to the account. I recieved a coopy of the fixed sum loan agreement which shows the payments of £156.09 for 60 months.

 

We have been paying £177.00 a month so there is obviously ppi added on but there is no mention of this on the agreement.

 

And I have also noticed that it has not been signed by the supplier on behalf of Hitachi Capital Consumer Finance.

 

Does this make the loan unenforceable. If so whats the next step?

 

Any help will be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to post up a copy of the agreement with personal details and any account number or bar code obscured?

 

Are the payments by direct debit? I.e. are they taking £177 pm or are you paying £177 pm.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much impossible without a scanner. You could type up the financial section, i.e. amount borrowed, interest etc.

 

First, I know absolutely nothing about PPI so please bear that in mind when considering any suggestions. I do know a bit about CCAs though.

 

1. The lack of a signature by or on behalf of the creditor will not make the agreement irredeemably unenforceable, however inaccurate figures in the prescribed terms could.

 

2. As the payments they are taking are in excess of the amount they should be, you need to query this. It could be that you are paying for PPI, but it could be something else. Either way, you need to know. I wouldn't normally suggest doing anything over the phone, but in this case a quick call might be the easiest way to get an answer. Phone customer services (when they are open again) and ask why the payments are more than they should be. It's possible that it's a simple error, no matter how unlikely that seems.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found a letter that we sent in oct 06, Saying I am pleased to confirm that Payment Protection Insurance has been added to the agreement and monthly instalments have been amended to £177.94.

 

Key Financial Information

Amount of credit £7500.00

Under this agreement you will pay 60 consecutive monthly payments of £156.09.

 

Cash price £8750.00

Advance payment: £1250.00

Total charge for credit £1865.40

interest rate 5.0% per annum variable

 

thx

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm asking for help with this on another thread.

 

Did you ask for the PPI or sign anything? Is there any reason why PPI would be unsuitable - self-employed, unemployed, previous medical history?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have found a letter that we sent in oct 06, Saying I am pleased to confirm that Payment Protection Insurance has been added to the agreement and monthly instalments have been amended to £177.94.

 

Key Financial Information

Amount of credit £7500.00

Under this agreement you will pay 60 consecutive monthly payments of £156.09.

 

Cash price £8750.00

Advance payment: £1250.00

Total charge for credit £1865.40

interest rate 5.0% per annum variable

 

thx

 

x

 

A loan of £8750 over 60 months at 5% APR would give payments of £164.67, totalling £9,880.70, and a total charge for credit of £1,130.70.

 

Based on their monthly payment, the actual APR charged (if the payments shown are right) would be 8.435%.

 

Does the agreement set out the PPI separately, or was the original agreement modified by a new one? If the PPI is separate, but there's no modification of the original, they will struggle to enforce as the APR is way out. Remember, though, that APR isn't a prescribed term under the agreement regulations, so this isn't irredeemably unenforceable as it can be enforced under s.65, but you would have a decent defence of prejudice under s.127(1)(i) should you get that far, based on these figures, IMHO.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

An extra £1311 has been added to the loan total which is presumably PPI and interest, assuming that the PPI was added near to the start of the loan. You need to send them a SAR to find out if the PPI was actually applied for.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

£7500 repaid in 60 installments of £156.09 gives a total cost of credit of £1865.40 (which is what is says above) and an APR of 9.5% so the 5% is clearly wrong.

 

Can you post a scan of the agreement with you personal details removed. I would like to see if the agreement is enforceable.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have scanned the document, but I am having trouble sending it as I do not have an attachment option when I reply, is there something that needs to be set up?

 

thx x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring up the image in photobucket and right click on it and "copy image location" or whatever the equivalent is in Internet Explorer

 

In the 'Post Quick reply' here click the insertimage.gif icon and paste the image location there - that will do it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry how do I do that, I am new to all this stuff. I think i have removed it?

 

You'll need to replace the picture on photobucket (after editing it with, say, paint, to remove your details) and then post the link again

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you can actually do the editing in photobucket - have a look a huggy's video tutorial about photobucket http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/165941-photobucket-video-tutorial.html?highlight=photobucket+video

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...