Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

rgeckouk Loan & PPI Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5624 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I stumbled across this site and was looking for a little help,

 

I took I loan out with Barclays in 2004 and was told at the time of filling out the loan application that due to it being the maxiumum amount that it was a good idea to take the PPI as it was more likley to go through. As I was in desperate need for the money I did this. The repayment amount was more than I was already paying and was told after 6 months I could come back into the branch so they could review and adjust this to a lower repayment. I was not made aware that the PPI would be added to the value of the loan and interest would incurr on this as well, as was told it was just like my car insurance policy.

 

I never recieved any PPI documents or policy number in the mean time paying nearly £780 a month to Barclays was becoming a struggle after 2 years I really hit a brick wall and started to miss payments. I made appointments at my local branch they where no help and the loan account everytime they looked at it showed that it had no PPI against it.

 

I finally got them to restructure the loan and remove the PPI but feel after 2 years paying the amount I had been to them totalling nearly £17500 for 2 years on an original loan of £25000 something is not right. I have finally got fed up with them now and have stopped paying the new monthly payment and have made an appointment with my local branch manager to get this sorted. If this meeting nothing comes of it where can I go?

 

Many Thanks R

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to this I now owe more than I origianlly started out with I had a £25000 loan that is now according to Barclays as of today I owe them in the region of £32000 which is split over two £16000 loans now when it was restructured. They really are starting to get to me and I want to run and hide.

 

Any help appriciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the meeting is not a success you need to contact the FOS.

 

You need them to show you all the figures relating to the loans as proof that PPI was/wasnt added. If it was added you should try to reclaim it back .Even if you had it and they removed it they may still be charging you interest on it. They should not have said that the loan was more likely to go through with PPI, was this in the bank or on the phone?

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont give up,firstly go to this meeting and get those figures.

 

1. you were verbaly mis sold and have no policy documents.

 

2. the loan showed no PPI, the figures will show what the truth is and they should compensate you for this as it should have been cancelled sooner.

 

3.The FOS will help if Barclays dont.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was all done in my local branch not over the phone, so unfortunatly no recorded call evidence.

 

That should not be to much of a problem, because it's up to them to prove it was not mis-sold!

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right you need to ring the FOS and let them know you want to make a complaint, they will fill out bits on the phone and then send you the forms to fill in. Your complaint is for mis selling and when the forms come there will be a section to explian your complaint, tell them everything, including the last meeting.

From now on only deal with Barclays in writing, no phone calls, no meetings in branch relating to PPI.

 

The FOS only look at complaints 8 weeks after your first letter of complaint to the company or if the company have given their final response. So if neither of there apply the FOS may have to write to Barclays for their final response on your behalf. This is fine.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...