Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advice please- moorcroft/argos card rip off


cfm.international
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

i need some advice how to get lowered/reduced /written off some nasty letters from moorcroft(argos card debt collectors)

i feel definatly ripped off( i was pressurized into a argos store card) and after spending 56quid i now owe nearly 200, as the moorcroft robbers bang on 12 quid to just send me a letter.

whats my best line of defense??

i live mostly abroad, and could i suppose go down the "deed poll" route, and forget them, how will this affect my credit rating??

can i sue them for abusive something or other???

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really. Assuming you were over 18, being persuaded to sign up to something ('pressurised') isn't mis selling - and clearly you must have used the card to purchase goods. You cannot take the moral high ground from charges applied because you didn't play the game.

 

You might be able to challenge their charges for letters if these fees where never disclosed to you or part of their T&C's, but I believe they are, and they do have a 'mised payment' charge.

 

Your credit file will show the default for 6 years, and all your known linked addresses will continue to be pulled up. If they suspect the deed poll trick, then you'll get the fraud flag too, and that is something best avoided!

Edited by buzby
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

the £12 is not a letter fee by the dca it's a late payment charge by the OC.

 

eh? this credit card idea seems diff to comprehend for some people!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

where are their cross reference files from?

how do they cross referance, the banks, and storecards ??

who decides , what goes on your file?

where is the data kept??

how do you get your file "cleaned up"?

i lived abroad for 20 years-never worked or anything for that time in the uk, how can they suddenly create a file with my name on??

do they cross reference n.i.numbers??

cheers..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've never bought anything on credit, opened a UK bank account or dealt with a utility that disclosed your financial dealings, then there's nothing you need to do - the trouble is, avoiding all this is virtually impossible. However, other countries have similar private firms doing EXACTLY the same thing, and many owned or partnered with them. With a full name a DoB, along with an address is all that is required to start the ball rolling. If you registered as a UK elector, you'll be listed for that address. From this basic framework, everything else is added, when they get new information that relates to you. If you get Royal Mail to redirect your mail - the CRAs are told 'to prevent fraud'.

 

Who decides what goes in? Information already in the public domain is used to verify and enhance the data they have, even the BT phone book is used. The more information they can get, the better the CRA clients like it. The data is kept on the individual servers ('secure') of the CRA's.

 

'Cleaning Up' you file is an urban myth. You can do it if you can challenge the information held is inaccurate in any way - a right under the DPA. But only the incorrect data, once proved - is expunged.

 

Assuming you've not been in the UK since 1988, you will have had a file created at your old address, if you've moved to Spain, then your old address (then) would be linked to your new one, and then added to - this is how they are linked. NI numbers are not, but if they know it, they'll use it as an additional identifier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so for example, if i defaulted on a bank loan, had voted, lived somewhere, had a uk bank account, they would 1)blacklist the address, 2) ban me from any credit or anything for 6 years?

what about if i paid it all off? would it still stay on file??

when i was abroad, i lived in about 6 different places- and they dont speak english at all, i was never in the phone book, voted or whatsover- and the uk credit agencys/banks have no jurisdiction in the country i was in..let alone come a knockin'....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Addresses aren't blacklisted, and neither are people. The database shows whether the person being enquired about is (a) known, and (b) the financial dealings (good AND bad), and all official civil court orders (CCJ's Property inhibitions).

 

All institutions can make their own minds up as to whether they wish to offer their services to you, it doesn't ban them from offering you credit, but they may score you as being a high risk and refuse to offer you their product. Some firms are refusing to offer credit cards to people who have no arrears or debts, simply because they are NOT using them 'profitably'.

 

The database shows a snapshot of six years, if you owed money it would show as owed, if it was paid off, then it would show as 'satisfied', but it would not disappear unless the entry was somehow in error and you could challenge it, forcing the CRA to remove it in its entirety.

 

A credit reference agency never has 'jurisdiction' as it isn't a department of the State, just a private company. The language used where you live(ed) is immaterial. Sandander for example (a well known Spanish Bank) reports to the Spanish equivalent of Equifax, and as I noted earlier, utilities routinely do the same. All it takes is a bit of 'intelligence' to link the J. Bloggs of Wolverhampton is the same guy now in Malaga and the linking is complete. The issues is nothing to do with debt, but leaving a financial trail of good, bad or non-contentious trading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all,

i need some advice how to get lowered/reduced /written off some nasty letters from moorcroft(argos card debt collectors)

i feel definatly ripped off( i was pressurized into a argos store card) and after spending 56quid i now owe nearly 200, as the moorcroft robbers bang on 12 quid to just send me a letter.

whats my best line of defense??

i live mostly abroad, and could i suppose go down the "deed poll" route, and forget them, how will this affect my credit rating??

can i sue them for abusive something or other???

cheers

How much of the balance is interest (they have a very high APR), how much charges? Have you paid off the original £56?

 

You can -and should- reclaim the £12 charges + interest levied on those charges, but the purchase and interest on that is legitimate and not reclaimable.

 

However. If Argos has sold the debt on to a DCA, you could ask the DCA to provide proof that you owe THEM anything at all, your contractual obligation being with Argos, not Moorcroft.

 

I have asked for your thread to be moved to the debt forum, where people who do know a lot about DCAs and their tactics will be able to assist you further. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved........

 

cfm.international. as Bookworm says, you can re-claim a lot of the charges levied on this account, however it might be worth your while sending Moorcroft a CCA request, without a valid CCA the debt becomes unenforceable, putting you in a good position to offer a 'full and final' settlement figure to clear the debt.

 

Letter 'N' in the library.............

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

Send this recorded, with a £1 postal order and don't sign the letter.

 

If they do come up with your agreement, you can then re-claim any charges, thus reducing the debt.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...