Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

brought car from trader that was clocked


tosh1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a used Ford Galaxy 1.9 diesel automatic from a garage in Lincoln in April 2007 with a mileage of 106000.

In the first month the gearbox had to be replaced at extra cost to myself as when I contacted the trader I was told that the warranty company would see to fixing it. The warranty company refused.

Since then I have had numerous other bits and pieces of work carried out and have decided to cut my loses and part exchange the car for something else.

Today I purchased a car from another garage offered the Ford Galaxy as part exchange with mileage of 121000. The garage completed a hpi check and informed me that in September 2006 the Ford Galaxy had a mileage of 217000 which was showing as all ner MOT certificates are computer linked and record mileage.

I was sold the Galaxy with history showing mileage up to 980000 and that it was a fleet car. I contacted the fleet company today and was informed that the car was never registered on their books and that all the paperwork I have which was supplied by the garage is a forgery.

Is there any advise that you can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep why not!

Why did you not get the car fixed by the first dealer at their cost, would be coverered under soga.

What mileage was on the MOT you got with the car.

This is fraud and should be reported to the police and TS.

You may have some redress through the courts as it was misrepresented and you may be awarded your money back. check with a solicitor.

may be worth a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

firstly i do not have the car anymore. the px was completeted at a lower cost to myself.

 

Unfortuatly I not allowed to name garage that sold me the car but they no longer exist.

 

i contacted consuner direct and they reffered me to trading standards

Edited by tosh1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take this all the way with Trading standards Tosh. If you Google ***** you will be smacked in the face with the complaints that come up.

 

These type of dealer just pray on ordinary people but if you have some proof that it was clocked then the owner could go to prison for the offence, it is very serious.

Edited by MARTIN3030
Sorry Connif-these are extremely serious allegations and so we cannot name yet.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the galaxy have a sticker on the dash clocks when you bought it saying that the dealer did,nt guarantee the mileage.

 

This is a very easy "get out" for the dealer and crops up very regulaly,if it did,nt your on a winner if it did then you have no chance.

 

IMHO these stickers should be banned , a car dealer has easy access to the HPi register and they should be made to check every sales vehicle this way and then add the report to the sales receipt thus covering themselves and the public.

 

This shocking practice of clocking cars should be stamped on!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the galaxy have a sticker on the dash clocks when you bought it saying that the dealer did,nt guarantee the mileage.

 

This is a very easy "get out" for the dealer and crops up very regulaly,if it did,nt your on a winner if it did then you have no chance.

 

IMHO these stickers should be banned , a car dealer has easy access to the HPi register and they should be made to check every sales vehicle this way and then add the report to the sales receipt thus covering themselves and the public.

 

This shocking practice of clocking cars should be stamped on!

 

Sorry, but I disagree. There is no easy "get out" for a motor dealer. A dealer is obliged as far as is possible (using such services as hpi, or contacting previous owners) to determine if the displayed mileage on a vehicle that he offers for retail sale is correct. He cannot rely on the excuse that he was unaware that a mileage was incorrect if it transpires that he never took the necessary steps that were available to him to check the vehicle's mileage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealer is only OBLIGED and NO legislation says they HAVE TO do these checks, if the dealer puts the sticker on the clocks which states he/she does guarantee the mileage then the ONUS is on the purchaser to verify the mileage.

 

There was great concern many years ago from various watchdogs about the use of these stickers but again its another loophole for unscrupulous dealers to use.

 

Its incredible how many purchasers ignore these stickers only to suffer great financial outlay sometime later when the vehicle developes major problems due to high mileage.

 

Personnally i would NEVER buy any vehicle without a comprehensive HPi report.

Edited by sickovit
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is very serous indeed, You must pursue Trading Standards as much as it takes.

 

lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealer is only OBLIGED and NO legislation says they HAVE TO do these checks, if the dealer puts the sticker on the clocks which states he/she does guarantee the mileage then the ONUS is on the purchaser to verify the mileage.

 

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. But then what do I know? I've only been a second hand car dealer for nigh on thirty years

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading standards are not exactly fast-I would assume that they are looking into this-certainly they should tell you what they are doing/propose to do.

In view of the seriousness of the allegations,and also the implications I have had to edit the named dealer.as per site guidance/rules.

Of course later we can reveal all once its safe to do so.

Edited by MARTIN3030

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gwc1000

 

Is there anything I can do? I have gone to trading standards but got nowhere.

 

Tosh1

Hi. Normally Trading Standards are not interested in individual cases. If you make a complaint against a dealer T/S will normally put it on file, and they may take action when they have a number of complaints against the same dealer. It is easier for them to successfully prosecute somebody with twenty cases against them as opposed to one case, as a good defence would probably get the dealer off in the latter circumstances.

I think you may have problems in your own case as the garage has changed hands. Also, you no longer own the car, so if you were to sue, what amount would you be claiming for? How would you calculate your losses as it would all be hypothetical. I think perhaps your best course of action would have been to have not part-exchanged when buying the new car and taken action against the dealer who sold you the Galaxy at that point. As a matter of interest how old was the Galaxy and how much did the dealer allow in chop?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a phone call from trading standards today. They are asking me to make a statement (which i have agreed to) as they will be taking the individual to court. They have a number of complaints regarding this garage that they are looking into. The person in question has opened up a new garage in a different name.

 

I brought the car for £6000 and it was a on a 2002 plate. When I part exchanged it they only gave me £1800 against the new car.

Edited by tosh1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I would say that £1800 for an 02 deisel Galaxy that has done over 200,000 miles is a fair price.

It is good news that T/S are taking action against the dealer. However, if T/S proceed with this, it will probably be a criminal case against the dealer, without any financial benefit to yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The dealer offered me this amount because they felt sorry for me as they were the ones who informed me that it had been clocked. I just sat there, shocked, and devastated.

 

If i don't get any money back and t/s win. thats fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...