Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mbna 'agreement' - now threat of legal action


underdog13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5397 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After a delay of months MBNA have finally deigned to respond to my CCA request; 3 days after they drafted a letter threatening legal action, a charging order and order of sale!

 

The 'agreements' look very much like a blue peter job to me - umpteen different code numbers scattered about.

Edited by underdog13
app form deleted
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 585
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

For clarity, since it's so hard to read, the codes on the abbey agreement bear a date stamp of 09- 02 beside the 'agreement' and 01/02 under the T&Cs - why would they have two different dates on the same page?

 

Secondly, on the Virgin 'agreement' the date code on the personal info page is 06-02, on the rear under the T&Cs it is 12/01. Again, why two different dates, especially when the date inder the T&Cs is 9 months out of date!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Windywoo; my thoughts exactly. I am so incensed by this obvious forgery, I will fight it all the way and am prepared to state in court that I believe it is fraudulent - if I end up saddled with a huge costs order, well that's the risk I will have to take.

 

What I'd really like to do is prove them guilty of fraud -surely we could garner enough evidence between the people on this site to at least introduce an element of doubt and hopefully convince the authorities to investigate further - or am I just being terribly naive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent idea underdog!

 

As they have supplied me with a similarly concocted "agreement" it would be great to expose this company for their underhanded tactics and complete disregard for the law, however getting enough people to complain and convince the powers that be......mmmmm!!

 

It would certainly be a struggle, no doubt about that; but I'd still like to try. If I lived anywhere near Chester I would be willing to take a job at Chester Towers just to get the inside scoop - that's how angry I am, lol.

 

I saw one really blatant forgery (can't remember the thread now, curse my goldfish memory), where MBNA had tacked the same column of prescribed terms on to someones application form and the two backgrounds didn't even match. Their copy and paste skills are improving; small wonder, really, they've had plenty of practice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that brilliantly helpful reply, Cosalt:D

 

In the Abbey agreement the text in the left hand column is a different size to every piece of text in the right hand side; the fine print on the right is smaller and the standard lettering on the right is larger than that in the left column.

 

The letters are not properly formed - it's bad on the right side, even worse in the left hand column.

 

There is absolutely no mention of T&Cs overleaf in either document, indeed, both agreements state 'I have received a copy of the T&Cs' which suggests to me that the terms were in fact in a different document! Both agreements tell me to read condition 11 - T&Cs on the actual agreement only go up to 2.4. If it was so important that I read this, why wouldn't it have been included in the column of terms on the agreement?

 

The second agreement (Virgin) has absolutely nothing to link the front page to the back. Text is different sizes and the right hand column is a much poorer quality - virtually unreadable. The spacings do indeed look very peculiar. There is a reference on the rear page of the Virgin agreement that says 'see leaflet enclosed for further details', most odd when there are a cloumn of details right next to that quote!

 

Your info has been fantastically helpful, Cosalt; I would feel much happier raising these points with a judge rather than simply stating 'it looks wrong to me and I think it's a forgery'! I understand you can't be definate without seeing the copy I received, but I think the very relevant points you raised has covered it. Would love to organise a conference - all us caggers comparing their dodgy agreements, then raising the issue with the relevant authorities:D

 

Like you, I was thinking of writing to MBNA requesting a view of my original agreement at their offices. Now. I wonder what their response will be;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks ever so much Chalkitup, for your interest and offer of help.

 

How I wish I had had your foresight and copied all my application forms! I agree that it is very odd that we are all suddenly receiving 'agreements' with the same column of prescribed terms. The arrogance of these companies is breath taking - as you say, they are taking a huge risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good to have you onboard FBR.

 

Nope, your eyes do not deceive you, there is no signature box for mbna on either the abbey or the virgin agreement/ application form.

 

You made a good point - every other contract you sign, you do expect a copy, don't you?

 

By the way, the prescribed terms on the back of your dodgy agreement - do they carry a date stamp in the bottom right hand corner of 12/01, by any chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least they've managed to vary their date stamps for once - I've seen so many agreements/ app forms with 12/01 stamped under the same stuck on columns of terms I was begining to think they were the only ones they had.:rolleyes: The 12/01 stamp on mine didn't correspond with my application!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is brilliant news Atwozee - realised they would be prof printed, but did not realise they (printers) would keep files for very long or that the code numbers were linked to the printers.

 

More for the police to look into - the game is afoot:D

 

Thanks so much for that, atwozee - more grist to the mill;) Isn't it amazing what caggers can come up with when they put their heads together? My learning curve is certainly in the steep ascendant!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, angel -glad to have your support.

 

We seem to be thinking along the same lines; I thought if I could get the police interested in mine, I could refer to other cases - with peoples' permission, of course. The more examples we can proffer, the weightier our case, hopefully.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've made some good points there, Atwozee. I would hate them to get away with it on a technicality; maybe a SAR first would be an idea.

 

Angel, please do speak to your retired police officer and let us know his opinion.

 

I'm chomping at the bit to get on with this; but don't want to go blundering in, mess it up and let them off the hook. Oh dear, patience was never one of my virtues:-|

 

So it looks like a SAR would be the next best step.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lexis,

you're not defeatist - just having natural doubts. I think most of us question whether we are doing the right thing every now and then; especially when we're feeling a bit drained or overwhelmed. Hope you have a happy and relaxing christmas, so you can recharge your batteries for the new year:)

 

Tbh, I'm not sure if you have to be prepared to go to court if you make a request under CPR. I thought you could use it as a bluff, same as they do;)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Onwards and upwards, indeed:D

 

Tbh, I don't think there's a great deal we can do now until the new year; I'm not sure when their offices close down and we need someone to be there to sign for the recorded deliveries.

 

Thanks for trying your retired policeman friend - be careful of phone charges to mobiles if they're abroad, though. No doubt he'll be back in the new year and well rested and happy to give you some info.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...