Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI refund even though I may not have even had a policy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5621 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is odd.

After reading things on here I thought I'd have a go at reclaiming.

 

I've had lots of loans in the past so I sent off a PPI claim to a past provider about a couple of weeks ago.

 

I enclosed my mobile number and I had a call an hour ago and it was the provider who says they can't find any paperwork other than the account number I gave them which is on their computer and that it is marked settled as I paid it off in 2005.

 

The lady said would I accept £600 as final offer so i said yes as its what I claimed and shes putting it in a letter for me to sign and then I get a cheque.

 

But I'm now certain I didn't even have PPI, what should I do?:confused:

 

and should i name them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello GOS and MC,

 

Sounds very suspicious. Why would they offer £600 if you never had PPI?

 

How can you be sure they didn't add some PPI into the loan without you knowing? You might be owed a lot more than £600.

 

I agree with Militantconsumer be very suspicious of an offer like this. They could owe you a lot more than what they are offering.

 

Go through the procedures of CCA request SAR get all the information for the cost of CCA £1.00 and SAR £10.00. do not accept until you have all of the relevant information from them. They could be selling you short on mis-sold PPI.

 

Their offer could save them loads of money if you accept.:rolleyes:

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, she seemed a very young lady but she obviously was told to tell me what she was told to tell by her boss.

 

Thing is, she said they got no record other than the account number I gave from my old bank statements and she could see that the account was settled as I paid it up but she had no other record.

 

£600 may be £600 more than what I could get because I just don't think I actually had PPI.

 

wHAT is the bargaining position because they have no paperwork other than recognising that I did have a loan in the past with them?:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the formal request under Data Protection Act. You will probably find that they have much more information than they told you on this occasion. I know it's tempting to take the money and run but you might be entitled to a LOT more - many people didn't think they had PPI but it turns out it was added without their knowledge, and it cost them thousands of pounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello GOS, MilitantConsumer and lilal,

 

Hmmm, she seemed a very young lady but she obviously was told to tell me what she was told to tell by her boss.

 

Thing is, she said they got no record other than the account number I gave from my old bank statements and she could see that the account was settled as I paid it up but she had no other record.

 

£600 may be £600 more than what I could get because I just don't think I actually had PPI.

 

wHAT is the bargaining position because they have no paperwork other than recognising that I did have a loan in the past with them?:confused:

 

Send the formal request under Data Protection Act. You will probably find that they have much more information than they told you on this occasion. I know it's tempting to take the money and run but you might be entitled to a LOT more - many people didn't think they had PPI but it turns out it was added without their knowledge, and it cost them thousands of pounds.

The advice I would offer is:

1. Send a formal Data Subject Access Request with a fee of £10.00 as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

2. Insist that you are provided with all information that refers to you as a data subject in any format that is held on any filing system whether a recorded system system or any other system they use to keep records.

3. Do not accept their view that the filing system must be a part of a formal filing system recognised by the FSA. FOS etc.

4. Make life as difficult for them as they have made life difficult for you.

5. Ask yourself these questions:

a. Did my bank respect me as a customer?

b. Were my bank fully conversant with my needs as a customer?

c. Did my bank deal with me in a respectful manner after I started my claim?

d. Was I dealt with in a fair manner by my bank after I requested a refund of PPI?

e. Were my bank prepared to pay back any due monies after the FOS adjudicator ruled in my favour?

f. Is my bank prepared to go to Court to try and retain PPI that they added to my Loan (in some cases without any authority or enforceable Credit agreement)

Another rant over

aa;)

I just have a thing about PPI sorry:D

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...