Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hurrah! We got there.  After asking four times about the defence you've answered. To win this you will have to be a hell of a lot more pro-active and get reading up.  The standard defence is on every single claim form thread here. So first task for the evening. Go to  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/393251-received-a-court-claim-from-a-private-parking-speculative-invoice-how-to-deal-with-it-hereupdated-dec-2021/ Scroll down to  Q2) How should I defend? There is the standard defence. Change (6) into (7) and add a new (6). 6.  In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. Get if filed this evening.
    • OK, relenting on my above irritated post ... It's worth defending it.  At the very least they are likely to offer a deal. Plus  PE have added two completely invented amounts.  The £100 charge has morphed into £125.  Then they've added £50 legal representative's costs although they have no legal representative.  Even if it went all the way to court and you lost, the  judge would likely disallow the made up £25 + £50. Please fill in the sticky as dx asked. Then dx will be on with details of how to defend.
    • Quite interesting that the Conservative East Midlands  Mayor candidate doesnt mention conservative on his promotion LOL   but he does claim that he, a Conservative politician, is the man to fix the 14 years of Conservative devastation of the region - inc 'fixing' problems inc the utter devastation of the roads, bus and train services that his party have  imposed   Must all rotate around the meaning of fixing he actually means .. fixing noun dishonest activity to make certain that a competition, race, or election is won by a particular person:   .. or perhaps he just means 'fixing' - preventing change
    • Yes, absolutely normal for them to waste everybody's time and money by asking for more time – which they are entitled to do, of course – but it is simply a waste of time. They use prepared template defences. They know they are in the wrong but they simply want to make your life tough because they don't care about you. However do keep an eye out. You never know there is just a 1% chance that they could miss the deadline in which case you should apply for judgement immediately.
    • Will check back in when the SAR from MCB is back and get advice on how to raise the formal complaint and what to say x
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA Requests returned by Egg as my letters aren't signed!


wUK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just recieved my CCA Requests and Postal Orders back from Egg (by standard mail), the letter says:

 

Egg Card CCA Requests

 

Dear XXXX

 

Thank you for your recent request for copies of your credit agreements. However we note that the letters enclosed are not signed.

 

Egg places paramount importance on the security of your personal data therefore we can not proceed with your request until we can successfully match your signature.

 

Please sign and return the enclosed at your convenience.

This is ridiculous; they know who I am as they have my address and the correspondence would be sent here anyway so I think they're being shifty and trying to get out of suppying the CCAs or they want a copy of my signature for whatever reason!

 

I don't have to sign a letter (and shouldn't from the advice on these boards) to obtain information posted to my home address!

 

What should I do about this?

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose reply along the lines of they have failed to comply with a lawful Sec 78 cca request? and you will pursue it as such until they do supply all the information requested.

 

State that if security conscious they should send the documents by recorded, signed for delivery..as you have done :) to the name and address of yourself, that they have on record. You will then have to sign for the paperwork, of which royal mail will then have record of :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've had a number of threatening letters from Moorcroft and more recently from solicitors with regards to my Egg account.

 

Egg have sent nothing to me since this went on but today out of the blue I got a rather odd letter from them:

 

Dear wUK

 

If you still require a copy of your Egg Card agreement please confirm this in writing.

 

As Egg places paramount importance on the security of your personal data, you'll need to sign the letter you send back to us.

 

I hope to hear from you soon.

 

Is it me or does this sound a bit fishy?

 

Should I respond to this letter and if so how?

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Minor update on this.

 

I received a letter from Moorcroft today with the usual lucky-dip headings they use - "Pre-Court Division" in this case.

 

The letter reads:

 

Dear wUK

Re: Egg Banking PLC

 

Further to your recent correspondence, I write to confirm that we are no longer dealing on the above account.

 

It's all in uppercase as well which always annoys me.

 

Anyway; the thing is they have had no recent correspondence from me as I have been communicating only with Egg and have been ignoring their stupid letters.

 

Is this just another one of their pathetic scare tactics or are they finally just shutting up and leaving me alone?

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

sounds like the don't have any paperwork for you and have handed it back to Egg.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, wUK.

 

You could try sending them this...............

 

RE Account NO XXXXXXXX

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/2007 the contents of which are noted

 

In your letter you make reference to requiring my signed authorisation before you comply. I draw your attention to the fact that the Consumer Credit Act 1974 does not require that I supply you a copy of my signature before you comply with my S78 request.

 

If it is for Data Protection purposes then I can happily supply you with documentation to substantiate my identity to you.

 

However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.I have to ask if you are concerned that you are corresponding with the correct person why has it taken so long to raise this matter.

 

As you are aware, disclosing data without adequate checks of identity is contrary to the 7th principal of data protection, listed in schedule 1 of the Data protection Act 1998:

 

7. Appropriate technical and organisational measures shall be taken against unauthorised or unlawful processing of personal data and against accidental loss or destruction of, or damage to, personal data.

 

My request for a true copy of my credit agreement under section 78 was made on xx/xx/2007 and the 12 working days for your compliance expire on xx/xx/2007. I note that there is no provision that removes the requirements of the act to provide this information on time, even if you are unsure of my identity.

 

I look forward to receiving the documentation requested.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

 

Either that, or sign the letter but put a line through it or add a couple of extra bits, so you would know if it had been 'lifted' at a later date.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a letter to Egg to that effect a while back and it seems to have been completely ignored.

 

I have heard nothing about this since then apart from this new letter from Moorcroft.

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, Egg seem to be doing this all the time now, I'd just sign it, but make sure you'd know if it were 'lifted'.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it likely that Egg have the CCA then (have others obtained a copy after this kind of thing) or has this just started to happen?

 

It does seem that Egg have something to hide if they are being purposely obstructive though.

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Do you want this thread shifted to the Egg Forum, you'll probably get more help in there.

 

You can also have a good look at Egg threads, I'm sure there's loads like this.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reported them to the ICO re wanting a signature?

 

Is this just another one of their pathetic scare tactics or are they finally just shutting up and leaving me alone?

 

You shouldn't hear from them again.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I wouldn't sign any letter to them. I don't trust them at all.

 

What type of account is this e.g. credit card, loan?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you reported them to the ICO re wanting a signature?

 

No; I haven't - how do I go about it and is it worthwhile?

 

Personally I wouldn't sign any letter to them. I don't trust them at all.

What type of account is this e.g. credit card, loan?

 

I have no intention of signing anything whatsoever; I'm not required by law to provide them with a "sample" so I'm not going to anytime soon.

 

It's both an Egg card and an Egg loan.

-- wUK --

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent them a letter with my reasons for not signing to their letter to me asking me for a signature.

Today I get more or less the same letter from them asking me for a signature again. They also sent me my postal order back again with the letter I sent them.

Again on the letter they ask me to sign.

In the last bit they tell me it's not required by law????

 

Are they just playing letter tennis or what?

If my advice helped you please click my star

Link to post
Share on other sites

No; I haven't - how do I go about it and is it worthwhile?

 

It will take a little while but often it is worthwhile. The link on how to contact then is here Redirect Notice

 

The Egg card is likely to be non compliant with the Act.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...