Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stacey V Halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Just started process - Have been told by my wife that the unhappy postman has just delivered 52 letters from the Halifax - Have to wait for me to get home to total up :)

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Now the fun begins.

Be sure to read the FAQ area and as many threads as you can, this has to be done the right way.

Good luck to you.:p

Sent Data Protection Act to Halifax 13.6.06

Daughters Data Protection Act sent to NatWest 5.6.06

Natwest sent statements on 24.6.06 Daughter owed £204.00 Preliminary ready to go.

Halifax sent my statements today(26.6.06) Owe me £1702.00

Preliminary sent on 27. 6.06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi strude

 

Thanks, i have & will continue to read the FAQs & threads, it seems a bit silly to me when people ask sooo many questions without reading the available FAQs & threads first.

 

Bit sad I know, but I'm excited just thinking about getting home & totalling up all those statements :)

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looked thru my statements,

£2575(+£270 over 6 years) for account1,

£108 for account2.

 

Halifax have sent me statements for

account1 going back to 1998 and account2 to 1994,

I HAVE read the FAQs,

Can anyone suggest the advantages/disadvantages of claiming for more than the last 6 years

(except of course the obvious advantage of getting even more of MY money back from the EDIT ********)

And how do I fill out a schedule of charges ?????

 

**Moderator note, post edited due to some libelous content.

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go get 'um stacey.

hope you got my reply to your PM.

Sent Data Protection Act to Halifax 13.6.06

Daughters Data Protection Act sent to NatWest 5.6.06

Natwest sent statements on 24.6.06 Daughter owed £204.00 Preliminary ready to go.

Halifax sent my statements today(26.6.06) Owe me £1702.00

Preliminary sent on 27. 6.06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did, Thanks Strude

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

...I HAVE read the FAQs,

Can anyone suggest the advantages/disadvantages of claiming for more than the last 6 years....And how do I fill out a schedule of charges ?????

 

Schedule of charges - have a look in the Templates Library, there are several version available, in Excel / Works etc.

 

You just input the charge name, date and amount and it works out the total for you, but will also show you the 8% interest which you can claim if your case reaches court.

 

6 year ruling - Well, this is somewhat unchartered territory for us, since most people have to rely on the list of charges (or copy statements) that the banks supply, which is usually just 6 years worth, so there are not many who have even attempted to look at this possibility.

 

We are of the opinion that the statute of limitations act (which would otherwise prevent you from claiming back beyond 6 years) is negated by the fact that the information (that charges were unawful) was either deliberately withheld from you, or that is was not known to the bank and thus was 'accidentally' withheld, but either way there is no real possibility that you could always have known you could reclaim them, so the 6 year rule can not apply.

 

This arguement has not been tested in a court - but neither has the issue of charges in general, so that doen't mean anything - so it is now up to to you... would you like to test the law, or are you primarily concerned with getting back the money you 'know' you can?

 

Let me add, this is by no means a ploy to suggest you might not be up for a fight - this is absolutely no pressure from us to push this issue, every individual has to work out what is best for them. I have read of users being paid sums that go beyond 6 years, but these were settled out of court again.

 

The disadvantage is obvious - you would really have a fight on your hands as the banks could pay you for the 6 years and leave the only argument as being the statute of limiations, and you would probably face them in court over this issue, which is clearly not everyone's cup of tea.

 

Have a read of these threads

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/11227-limitation-act-1980-lets.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/3598-do-you-have-charges.html?highlight=years

 

Also go to the Limitation Act 1980 which linked in the statute library. have a brief look through the Act and pay special attention to s.32 (1)(b)

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply jonni2bad

You really cleared that up for me :)

FYI - the amount I could reclaim outside of the 6 years is £250, the amount within the 6 years is £2575 - me has to think, i think

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Received 2 letters from the Halifax yesterday:

 

1) Goodwill gesture of £261 for a claim of £2700 - er.... No Thanks

 

2) Goodwill gesture of £108 for a claim of £108.....

 

I guess I should accept their kind offer of a full settlement for the smaller claim then?????

 

As my better half said "Tell them you will accept the £108 & tell them you will use it to pay the court costs for the bigger claim" :)

 

But seriously, I am guessing that if I accept the £108 it will have no bearing on the bigger claim, I don't want to accept it if they are playing tricks with me & I unknowingly mess up the bigger claim??

 

HELP APPRECIATED

19.7.06 - Statements Received

22.7.06 - Prelims Sent (Recorded Delivery)

24.7.06 - Prelims Received by Halifax

02.8.06 - Standard Customer Complaint Letter Received

05.8.06 - LBA Sent (Recorded Delivery)

09.8.06 - LBA Received By Halifax

19.8.06 - 10% goodwill offer received

19.8.06 - 100% goodwill offer for small claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just as long as you keep your wording straightforward...

 

I accept the offer of £108 as settlement of the claim against account number XXXXXXX but I am only prepared to accept the sum of £261 as a partial settlement against the claim on account number xxxxxxxxx and will continue with my claim for the remainder.

 

Something along those lines........

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi

 

Just started my war with Halifax, still waiting on my statements, they have got till March 20th to send them to me. Sent mine to Miss L Lumb of Retail Business Risk,HBOS PLC, Trinity Road, Halifax. Has anyone a tel number for this lady at all, incase I need to call.

 

Thanks in advance

 

8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...