Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ court claim form received


jodenice
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Jodenice

 

Did you send the claimant a copy of your AQ?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 month later...

Ok Weightmans seem to have ignored the fact that we sent a copy of our defence to them and have now sent us a copy of the claimants response. What do you think? I haven't written it all out exactly but this is the jist of it.

 

They have a copy of the of the first page of the original loan agreement, and state that due to high volumes originals are not kept but are instead microfiched. It says - despite efforts to retrieve such, the claimant has so far been unable to recover a complete copy of the loan agreement from the archives. The Claimant continues to use its best endeavours to recover the remaining pages and a copy of these will be forwarded on receipt.

 

They attach the copy of the default notice which is recreated from electronic records, as it has no further proof of service other than these records.

 

Two typed statements of account, marked 1 and 2. The first statemnet of account has been compiled using electronic records. the opening and running balanceds of the first statemetn do not reflect the interest payable on the amount of credit loaned to you (I guess as it was buy now, pay a year later or then pay all the interest) and the second statement has since been adjusted to reflect the interest payable by us under the loan agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

great - well have just received a letter saying that our claim has been struck out as the session was heard - aren't we supposed to be given a date and time to attend? Is that it then? I'm so gutted, I knew this was a bad idea, next time I will be just admitting it.

 

Can anyone help please, I've been trying to ask for help on here for ages but i've only had one reply in about a month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there anyway we can appeal or resit the court hearing? The original date was set for april in January but as there have been various delays requested by HFC we thought this date would be changed. Are we stuffed now? Can they get their hands on my house?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi jodenice i cannot help you as i am still learning click the triangle hopefully one off the mods will be along shortley to help you good luck:)

 

thanks for replying anyway - what triangle? the one that says report a post? i can't see any others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok team alerted-this is not my area but I will flag it up for you so please be a little patient.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can we just be clear on a couple of points

 

1.You say the original date was set for January-has there been any notices to tell you that that date was changed ?

and also what was the date in April ?

 

2.What was the last comms you got from the Court prior to the latest one-what did it say and what was date ?

 

Whats the date on the ltest comms from Court?

 

any chance that you can give the exact wording from the courts letter (I assume this is an Order )

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No my summons in January said that the court date was in April. However, i didn't know if this was the exact date, or if we would receive confirmation. I also thought that as the solicitors had sent us their application form showing that they had requested a months stay that we would have a new court date.

 

the last item received from the court was dated 15th jan, it said that within 14 days the claimant must file and serve original loan agreements, default notice, evidence of service and statement of defendants account. on this letter it says that a case management conference is listed to be heard at the court on the 22nd april. (As we got a copy of the solicitors application on the 26th January, saying they wanted a one month stay but no court mediation, I presumed that the court date would also be set back and this is where it all started to go pete tong)

 

Its obviously my mistake.

 

last comm was general form of judgement

 

says

it is ordered that

 

1) defence struck out

20 there be judgement for the claimant for XXX amount and costs of XXX payable forwith upon service of this order

dated 22 april

 

although date on form in right hand corner is 28th april

 

I can see that I have made a mess of this and now guess i just need a way to repair it, we cant afford to pay the whole amount at once, i'm worried they'll get a charging order on our flat, I need to somehow let them know about boyfs DMP - all his spare cash goes to that, he has no spare money!

Edited by jodenice
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok the service will I assume allow the usual 2 days so that makes it 7 days from 30th I am thinking.

You have the bank holiday.

It looks as though you are going to have to apply to have the judgement set aside.

It needs to be done ASAP -obviously you cant file anything before Tuesday....but during the next couple of days should get it all ready to file by downloading and filing in the forms from the Hmcs website.

Try not to let this spoil your weekend-theres lots of help and guidance for this and I have no doubt that by Tuesday you should be more up to speed with how to sort this out.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I realise that you may not have much of an idea on how to proceed,but I think it would be of some benefit if you read a little about the process.

heres a link for this;

 

 

PART 13 - SETTING ASIDE OR VARYING DEFAULT JUDGMENT - Ministry of Justice

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read them, didn't really understand what it meant however i would assume that the part that particularly applies to me is the following section

 

Cases where the court may set aside or vary judgment entered under Part 12

 

13.3

 

(1) In any other case, the court may set aside(GL) or vary a judgment entered under Part 12 if –

(a) the defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim; or

 

(b) it appears to the court that there is some other good reason why –

(i) the judgment should be set aside or varied; or

 

(ii) the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim.

 

 

 

(2) In considering whether to set aside(GL) or vary a judgment entered under Part 12, the matters to which the court must have regard include whether the person seeking to set aside the judgment made an application to do so promptly.

(Rule 3.1(3) provides that the court may attach conditions when it makes an order)

(Article 19(4) of the Service Regulation (which has the same meaning as in rule 6.31(e)) applies to applications to appeal a judgment in default when the time limit for appealing has expired.)

 

 

 

so have i got a good enough reason to set judgment aside? I'm not sure we have, I don't think he would have won if he went to the court on the 22nd but it was a chance to question the lack of an original loan form and point out that he was on a DMP. I still think he would have ended up with a CCJ as the defence we had was flimsy at best (and vague to boot, I had no idea what it meant!)

 

i've heard there is an option of redetermination hearing if we accept the judgement, what do you think of this possibility?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

 

I am looking at the forms (N244 and a fee remission form) and I am stuck. I need to finish these by lunch so i can send them off.

 

It asks whether I have attached a draft of the order I am applying for - i dont understand.

It asks what type of hearing I want (telephone or court hearing or no hearing - which is best?).

It asks for level of judge, fixed trial date and who should be served.

 

I've got to provide evidence and a statement and I'm not even sure what excuse I'm giving for missing it in the first place.

 

Can anybody help?

 

for the expenses form - to try and get a fee remission - it only takes into account his earnings and not his outgoings. On paper he looks quite wealthy - its the debts which are bleeding him dry! Does this mean he won't get a fee remission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I am attempting to fill in the form.

 

the bit i am confused about is 'What order are you asking the court to make and why?' I'm not sure what to write here - and it asks if I have attached a draft!

 

I think I am asking for a judgement to be set aside and to give the reasons is that right? I'm not sure what draft I am supposed to attach.

 

If yes i'm going to say - in that section - that I was under the impression (from the claimants application) that a stay had been applied for, for a month, for mediation and although I sent correspondence to try and settle the matter out of court a reply was never received. I also did not receive original documentation (signed agreement) from the claimant who wrote at the end of March to say they could not find it. I believed that the court would set a new date to allow for the stay or make me aware the the original documentation had not been handed in. I was not aware that the court date was to be held on the 22nd April. I would not have been able to attend this date due to my shifts at work and I was unable to attend and have the opportunity to defend myself.

 

does this sound like the ramblings of a mad man?

 

Also, I've ticked no hearing but there is a warning at the bottom which states most cases involve a hearing. Will ticking 'no hearing' go against me.

 

Any advice appreciated. thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...