Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Euro Car Parks PCN


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5651 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have just received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for parking on a Double Red Line on a Sunday Night at a FREE Car Park at Cineworld Cinemas. There was no parking bay available and found few cars parked on the Red line and parked behind them. I am a regular to this place and find lots of cars parked there and never noticed any warning signs. But today after the PCN, i searched and noticed a board saying - Park in Bay only. But nowhere it is mentioned about penalties or anything else. Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As suggested they cannot legally enforce this with any statute law.Prepare to be bombarded with notices after they apply to Swansea for your details-ignore them and you have no legal requirement to tell them who was driving.

Usual scenario is after half a dozen threats they will go away.

Will move your thread.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received a letter. They got the details from DVLA and have increased the amount from 50 to 70 Pounds, with 28 days notice. They say of further 25 pounds admin charge if not paid and referred to Debt collection agency.

 

Am sending off a Template Letter to appoint me, as my brother is the registered keeper. Am also sending a letter from myself.

 

Thanks to the site and the templates. Will keep posted if i hear back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather than giving up sooner, they'll know their letters are rattling somebody and probably send you more letters before giving up. Plus you're using up your own time.

 

Euro Car Parks simply don't do anything. Ignore them, you'll receive 4 or 5 letters, and then they'll give up and go away - probably around February or March.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am sending off a Template Letter to appoint me, as my brother is the registered keeper. Am also sending a letter from myself.

 

Thanks to the site and the templates. Will keep posted if i hear back.

 

I don't recommend that you do anything of the sort.

 

If you are going to send them anything at all, send them something like this.

 

Reference your correspondence, the contents are noted.

 

It is denied that any monies are owing to your company and that the alledged debt is in dispute.

 

As you are undoubtedly well aware, private car parks do not fall under any legislation other than those which govern contracts between a trader and a consumer. I am fully aware that you have no right to demand anything from the driver of a vehicle for any payment over and above any loss that you have suffered as a trader.

 

Should you wish to pursue a case for a breach of contract, I require:

 

Precise details of the contract that the driver of the vehicle in question was alledged to have entered into.

How the contract was entered into (ie for what consideration were services provided).

In what way did the driver of the vehicle breach the conditions of any contract.

Proof that the driver of said vehicle had knowingly entered into said contract.

Evidence of said losses and a breakdown of those loses equivalent to your demand for £70.

 

Upon receipt of these items, a suitable course of action shall be considered. Be warned, however, that if it is found that your demands have been inflated beyond reason, or that elements of your "contract" could be considered to be unlawful, these shall be taken up with the relevent trading authorities.

 

Furthermore, as this matter is in dispute, should you choose to pass it on to a third party, this shall also be reported to the relevent authorities. No liability shall be accepted for any further costs incurred by yourselves unnecessarily involving said third party in this dispute.

MBNA - Agreed to refund £970 in full without conditions. Cheque received Sat 5th Aug.:D

Lloyds - Settled for an undisclosed sum.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree that it is best not to correspond with them.

If you do contact them send the template letter. I did this but it was ignored. I do however, have it as evidence that they were informed. After some agitating etc,. The parking company concerned has been written to by Trading Standards who were 'leaned on' by my MP; TS have told my mP they are waiting for a response. Companies House has also written to them regarding irregularities. I am interested to see what happens next, and with the support available on this site I am not intimidated and will battle on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vicked. Just follow the advice of the previous posts and please read the stickies. Ive had the same problem from Euro Parks which they then passed on to Credit Control Management Debt Agency (who i think are the same company under a different guise-anyone confirm this?) who sent approx 2 letters to me....then nothing!! They WILL give up after a few letters and disappear.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...