Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help pls - First Plus PPI complaint


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've sent 2 letters to First Plus which they have responded to but totally ignored the points of my complaint.

 

They have referred the complaint to the broker Norton Finance who have only responded to my first letter.

 

My complaint referred to the amount of rebate when I redeemed two loans (the first loan was combined into another). The first loan was via Norton however the second loan was via First Plus. The first PPI rebate only meant a small loss to me however the second rebate was very small compared to the total amount of PPI.

 

In my second letter to First Plus I requested they resolve or I would take further action via the court and report to FOS.

 

First Plus have simply referred me back to Norton !!

 

Please could I have some advice regarding my next steps.

 

The loans were taken out in 2002 so I'm unsure if I can complain to FOS and I may have to complain to the FLA (????).

 

Do I have to wait for my complaint to be completed before I can raise any action via the court?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I've sent 2 letters to First Plus which they have responded to but totally ignored the points of my complaint.

 

They have referred the complaint to the broker Norton Finance who have only responded to my first letter.

 

My complaint referred to the amount of rebate when I redeemed two loans (the first loan was combined into another). The first loan was via Norton however the second loan was via First Plus. The first PPI rebate only meant a small loss to me however the second rebate was very small compared to the total amount of PPI.

 

In my second letter to First Plus I requested they resolve or I would take further action via the court and report to FOS.

 

First Plus have simply referred me back to Norton !!

 

Please could I have some advice regarding my next steps.

 

The loans were taken out in 2002 so I'm unsure if I can complain to FOS and I may have to complain to the FLA (????).

 

Do I have to wait for my complaint to be completed before I can raise any action via the court?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

 

Hello Mr Monkey

 

Welcome to the forum.

 

I have to ask a few questions.

 

Who set up the original loans??????? Dependant on who set up the loans. This is your first post of call.

 

These companies will pass you from one to another in an attempt to frustrate matters somwhat.

 

The majority of ppi sales on loans were commission based, one would pay an incentative for the other to apply it. There is legislation regarding this in the ppi info stickies.

 

Both these companies have to take responsibility for this mis selling as they both profited from it.:mad:

 

The fact the loans were taken out in 2002, more than likely means that the fos will not investigate, but you can always ring or write to them for advice.

 

The other important point is that you have to exhaust their internal complaints procedure and get a final response letter from them to pursue them via the court if necessary. This shows that you have given them every opportunity to right the wrong before you have been forced to take action.:-D

 

If you need any help please ask:-D

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your best bet is to ring the FOS tomorrow and tell them all about it they should be able to advise you if they can help or who can.

If this about insurance rebate they may say the insurance company is responsible. Who is the insurance with?

Did you take out the loans in 2002 or get the rebate in 2002?

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both loans were taken out in 2002.

 

First loan was redeemed by a further advance and approx £730 was added to the new loan after the PPI rebate. We then redeemed the new loan in May 2003 and given a rebate of approx £1350 against a total premium of £9800 !!

 

 

First Plus wrote back to me blaming Norton Finance and have alledgedly asked them to contact me. A month later I have heard nothing from Norton Finance and no further contact from First Plus.

 

 

As I can't complain to FOS I need to establish who I should complain to now ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both loans were taken out in 2002.

 

First loan was redeemed by a further advance and approx £730 was added to the new loan after the PPI rebate. We then redeemed the new loan in May 2003 and given a rebate of approx £1350 against a total premium of £9800 !!

 

 

First Plus wrote back to me blaming Norton Finance and have alledgedly asked them to contact me. A month later I have heard nothing from Norton Finance and no further contact from First Plus.

 

 

As I can't complain to FOS I need to establish who I should complain to now ??

 

If you are complaining about the rebate in 2003, the FOS should be able to tell you who to complain to even if it is not them.

Any opinion I give is my own and given without

any liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...