Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
    • Well, it's up to you. Years & years & years ago the forum used to suggest appealing to POPLA, but then AFAIK POPLA's remit was changed and it became much more biased in favour of the PPCs. One of the problems with taking that route is that the onus will fall on you to prove your appeal, while if you do nothing the onus is on MET to start legal action which experience teaches they are very, very reluctant to do. If you go down the POPLA route I would think your ace would be insufficient signage.  Are you able to go back there and get photos of their rubbish, entrapping signs?
    • The first clearly visible sign as you pull in to the car park states “McDonald’s Customers Only 60 minutes” The next clearly visible sign is an almost identical sign outside Starbucks which states “60 minutes free stay for customers only” There are other signs towards the rear of the car park (away from the outlets) that have the terms and conditions on them in very small print.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sharpmans Sprog v DLC / Orange Personal Comms


SharpmanTF1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok,

 

My eldest sprogg has fallen into the debt trap. she's split from her b/f and has left her to pick up the pieces.

 

She recieved the following from a company called Direct Legal & Collections

 

24qp941.jpg

 

A week later she recieved the following:

 

2m366xc.jpg

 

In the Balance outstanding figure there was an astronomical amount of £1003.59

 

She swears that the account did not get that high. I told her to ring Orange who informs her that the outstanding balance is only £357.48

 

It appears that these jokers have added an extortionate amount to the balance.

 

As this is a Mobile phone contract what options are there open to me to obtain a correct statement of account. i know I can't CCA them as it doesn't fall within that criteria.

 

Any advice welcome.

 

Sharpman on behalf of his sprogg

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could send SAR's to them both....it costs £10 for each but at least you will know exactly where you stand !!!....re charges....

 

As for the doorstep visit....if you need to send them this....(by recorded)

 

Dear xxxx

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Sharpman.

 

I'd send them a SAR, see what the score is.

 

Under the Data Protection Act you are entitled to having all information held about you supplied under a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) - a Subject Access Request. This requires the network to provide a copy of everything the network has on its files about you, from your dealings with customer services to copies of all the bills ever issued to you.

 

Once you have the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) information (which can often run to hundreds of A4 sheets), containing a 'screen grab' of your account data taken from their computer files. You can use this to identify any anomalies in your account, or unfair charges. You can also refer to this data as the reason of your complaint and ask for the fees/costs to be refunded. If they do not, the SAR document then becomes irrefutable evidence in any court action (as it was provided by the defender). If the company charges you a fee for the SAR, add the cost of this to your claim also.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at the letters they are from the same company.

 

Letter two is £1.00 less than the first letter so goes to prove that the £1.00

sent with the i&e sheet as payment in pro rata for the account. As they

have used this to reduce the account would they in fact have accepted

the offer. They have not replied to the letter in any way. When I started this

for her it was with a company called Credit solutions Limited. so after the

Pro rata and I&E sheet were sent they passed it over to these ppl. Anyone

know if credit solutions limited and Direct legal collections are connected in any way ?

 

Sharpman on behalf of sprogg

Edited by SharpmanTF1
spelling

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update

 

Must be a record somewhere sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) off 30th sept, recieved details back 06th October.

 

1x Statement with 1 entry on it. theres no information relating to how they get to the starting figure of £1003.59 when the account leaving orange about a third of that.

1 x sheet of operator notepad

Screen print of address details.

 

Needless to say I sent a replay along the lines of .... you have bills but isn't my responsability to donate to them. and requesting further details.

 

sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...