Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

judgement by default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5731 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I started a money claim against abbey national and they have not ackowledged or responded to the claim.

Yesterday i issued a judement by default does this mean that abbey have not follwed the rules in the bank waiver where they must ackowledge all claims.

 

I suppose my question is now i have issued a judgement by default what happens next.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If this is a claim for bank charges it is unusual that it has not been automatically stayed.

 

What will probably happen is that Abbey will apply for a hearing to Set Aside (suspend) the judgement because of the test case.

 

You can wait till this happens or apply for a Warrant of Execution to enforce the judgement through bailiffs. To apply for a WOE costs £55 I think and will probably be fruitless, but may give you a brief feeling of satisfaction!!!

 

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

please escuse my ignorance but surely if the bank does not acknowledged the claim then have have broken the rules of the FSA waiver.

Which states that all claims must be akcnowledged by the defendent...in this case they have not done so should the claim go through the normal channels.

Edited by ross1976
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

please escuse my ignorance but surely if the bank does not acknowledged the claim then have have broken the rules of the FSA waiver.

 

It's not unusual for banks to ignore court claims or lose them in the midsts of their massive and incompetent network of departments, hence a lot of claims go through to the default judgement stage.

 

Usually, though, the court you put the claim in with would realise from the POC that this was a claim for bank charges and automatically stay it . . . it seems that whichever court you used have missed this fact.

 

BAE :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usually, though, the court you put the claim in with would realise from the POC that this was a claim for bank charges and automatically stay it . . . it seems that whichever court you used have missed this fact.

 

The court will not stay the claim until the defendant has acknowledged the claim, which Abbey have not done, and therefore the court have allowed a judgement by default
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the info

I phoned the court today and the Judegment went through because Abbey have not acknowleged the claim. thank you for the correct info Micheal.

I will now have to issue a warrant of execution will let you know what happens.

 

Regards

Ross

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh its one of those video camera moments.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...