Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I posted a couple of years ago about our debt situation and have been trying to pay off our debt as best we can. It is a possibility I maybe made redundant in a few months time, so I am trying to find out everything I can about what happens in today’s world when you can’t pay. I keep finding conflicting advice on various sites so I wanted to post this quote to get thoughts. It claims basically that the dca will likely get enforceable documents these days and therefore it’s likely you will have to pay dca at some point during the 6 year process.    on here I read a lot of comments assuming the exact opposite of this. A lot of the threads on here state the beginning of the process but I never see conclusive stuff about what happened from start to finish to get insight into whether debts post 2015 have been enforced etc. I hear a lot here not to pay dca companies but most my debts are post 2015 debts I am all up to date on our debts but if I lose my job it is likely I’ll end up where I tried to avoid in the first place. Which is destroying our files and dealing with DCA. I’ll post it below so you can see what I mean.   It is likely that any debts incurred after 2007 will end up with all the documentation being provided and being enforceable. Therefore you should use the time while awaiting responses going through your Income & Expenditure and considering any possiblity of making a full and final settlement. It can take a number of months to reach the stage of a hearing date and exchange of witness statements and normally you would be able to settle or come to an arrangement to pay before the court hearing, once documents have been provided, although this isn’t guaranteed.
    • depends who said sols state their client is. IDRWW vis~IDR(worldWide) are a debt collector regulated & registered in the UK & USA    they are not solicitors. they use various 'for hire' - here use our letterhead paper tiger solicitors. its just a case of who's stupid enough to join their folly. IDR law used to be their fav but they lost do much money, they broke ties after almost being struck off and now do Will/Probate disputes only. IDR Legal are their sols wing. moriarty law Judge and priestly Taheel - a foreign DCA that use absolutely any trick in the book to extort money even pretending to be any of the above inc being the bank themselves in phone calls.           
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

legal default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

in 2000 i lost my job and defaulted on a loan with black horse.

is there a time limit in which they have to default an account?

it was actually regd on my file in aug 2004.

any advice greatly appreciated

thanks

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely though this cannot b correct since if the default was issued some 4 years after the incident the consumer is actually blacklisted for 10 years rather than the statute 6

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was exactly what i thought but how can i challenge it legally? If anyone can enlighten me on default regulations and how they have to be executed i would greatly appreciate it

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A credit file default isn't technically the same as a County Court Judgement.

 

The credit agencies say it will stay on your file six years from being settled, so it could actually be on your credit file for 20 years if thats how long it took to get it paid off.

 

The best thing to do is to write to black horse disputing it and asking for a copy of the default notice, if they can't provide it, they have to remove it.

If the name of the claim is blue and underlined, click it to see how I did it.

  • Halifax - 1st Request for £3748.80 sent 10/06 Settled in full and 5% donated


  • Goldfish - Unable to comment further, have a read


  • Lloyds - Data Protection Act sent 19/04 1st estimated request for £1500 sent15/08 LBA sent 08/09


  • Carphone Warehouse - Data Protection Act sent 19/04 Chased 04/07 ICO complaint 18/07


  • First National - 1st Request for £280 sent 05/05 Settled in full and 5% donated


  • Yes car credit - LBA sent 19/07 Court Action launched 26/09


  • HFC Bank - 1st Request for £100 sent 06/06 Settled in full and 5% donated


Like what I said? Hit the scales on the top right of my post. Cheers

 

Disclaimer - By giving advice, I am not putting myself across as a legal expert. Always seek professional advice.

Help the site, donate 5%, I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanx deemacperth

ive just spoken to them and they said they dont have a copy of the original credit agreement, so therefore no CA, cant be defaulted...yes?

will keep all posted as to what they say in reply.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Got the reply today and they have found the original credit agreement and sent it to me. Ive been reading through sarahhk thread on defaults with great interest.

Hopefully i can have it removed now coz the agreement is terminated and permission to place info on my file is also terminated since the default in itself terminates the agreement.

Think ive got that right.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the reply today and they have found the original credit agreement and sent it to me. Ive been reading through sarahhk thread on defaults with great interest.

Hopefully i can have it removed now coz the agreement is terminated and permission to place info on my file is also terminated since the default in itself terminates the agreement.

Think ive got that right.

 

Please let us know. just because they can produce a CCA agreement, it doesn;t give them the right to put a default on your account.

 

ig they cannot produce a Default notice (before late 2005, banks tended not to keep a true, signed copy - they have tightened up their act now) then they don't have a leg to stand on. Don't be fobbed off when they try and send you a "template copy"

 

NEo

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

got this off experian FAQ's about defaults and how long they stay on your file for.

 

 

Accounts that are still being used will continue to be held until the account is closed and then for six years after settlement. Defaulted accounts are kept for six years from the date of the default, although the current balance should show if payments have been made since the default or if the account has now been fully paid.

 

i think then that the default should be removed after six years then, anyone lese have any thoughts or know if this is true?

alexthekid

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes sounds like removed 6years after the defaulted date.

 

Halifax

Sent LBA
27/6/06

Been on hol for a week, got home found letter from them dated
27/6/06 offer of £92 claiming £1155.10 so no deal.

Filed claim with Moneyclaim 12/07/06

Halifax acknowledged claim 25/7/06

Court papers received 28/7/06 Halifax intend to defend.

HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL 1/8/06

Donation made

Birmingham Midshire (mortgage charges) Prelim letter sent 2nd Aug 2006, full offer received 11th Aug with conditions.

13th Aug accepted offer unconditionally.

BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES (MORTGAGE) SETTLED IN FULL 24/8/06

Sent SurlyBonds template letter to get defaults removed to Birmingham Midshires 27/08/06

DEFAULTS REMOVED 5/09/06.
THATS 9 DAYS LATER, YES 9 DAYS

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neo et al, do you know what specific legislation covers the copy of the default notice, i've been sent a template and told they don't keep original copy. want to make sure I'm confident when I email them again, I don't see mention of it in CCA 1974, but maybe the terms of the Act cover it

Link to post
Share on other sites

ecobabe - have u found the answer to this... check the legalitities sction - there is loads on there :)

If you find this post useful, please click the Scales of 'Justice' in the top right corner. Thanks ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, sorry for not updating this thread sooner but been really busy with gettin my charges back. Anyway, i got the copy credit agreement from Black Horse.

Then after much reading on here found the template for the alternative approach to default removal supplied by Surlybonds, what a letter!!

(its in the templates library). That was sent on 23-8-06 and requests, amongst other things a copy of the default notice, which i never received. It also gives them only 5 days to comply. Anyway its now 1-9-06 and ive not heard diddly squat from them. Time to complain to trading standards and the ICO me thinks.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the letter i sent, take time to read it properly so you fully understand its contents. For my money its brilliant and a whopping thanks goes to Surlybonds for spending so much time preparing it.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/24013-defaults-proposed-method-removal.html

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neo, thanks I scoured the CCA and found this,

 

87 Need for default notice

(1) Service of a notice on the debtor or hirer in accordance with section 88 (a “default notice”) is necessary before the creditor or owner can become entitled, by reason of any breach by the debtor or hirer of a regulated agreement,—

(a) to terminate the agreement, or

(b) to demand earlier payment of any sum, or

© to recover possession of any goods or land, or

(d) to treat any right conferred on the debtor or hirer by the agreement as terminated, restricted or deferred, or

(e) to enforce any security.

I have quoted this to them and stated that since they do not have true copy and I never receievd one then they can't prove it was posted. They have got a continuance and have referred it to their senior partner

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

i sent the above letter and s10 statutory notice on 23-8-06. I have not heard a thing from black horse and the 21 days are now up. Should i be taking a trip to the courts with an N1 in my hand?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i sent the above letter and s10 statutory notice on 23-8-06. I have not heard a thing from black horse and the 21 days are now up. Should i be taking a trip to the courts with an N1 in my hand?

 

As SB suggested .. make the CRA do the work.

 

Write to them and tell them you are disputing the entry as incorrect. They will then contact Black Horse. Make sure you tell them you have never received a copy of the default notice, and unless they can produce the original default notice they should remove it.

 

There is some info in this forum about it somewhere. I'll see if I can find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks tinkerbelle

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Halifax

Sent LBA
27/6/06

Been on hol for a week, got home found letter from them dated
27/6/06 offer of £92 claiming £1155.10 so no deal.

Filed claim with Moneyclaim 12/07/06

Halifax acknowledged claim 25/7/06

Court papers received 28/7/06 Halifax intend to defend.

HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL 1/8/06

Donation made

Birmingham Midshire (mortgage charges) Prelim letter sent 2nd Aug 2006, full offer received 11th Aug with conditions.

13th Aug accepted offer unconditionally.

BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES (MORTGAGE) SETTLED IN FULL 24/8/06

Sent SurlyBonds template letter to get defaults removed to Birmingham Midshires 27/08/06

DEFAULTS REMOVED 5/09/06.
THATS 9 DAYS LATER, YES 9 DAYS

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks

Just a quick question though,

Part of the letter penned by SB asks for a copy of any default notice,should i therefore wait the 12 + 30 days before filing for non compliance of statutory request or does the stat request override this?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well i rang the compliance dept and spoke to a guy who shall remain nameless.

 

Heres the text of what i received from them.

 

Whilst i have noted your assertion that yur data has not been processed in accordance with the Data Protection Act or with your consent, i confirm this is untrue.

I attach a copy of the credit agreement document which you have signed, in relation to which information has been recorded with the credit reference agencies. The data protection: What We Will Do With Information terms on the front of the agreement document you signed, confirms that details of the agreement will be recorded with credit reference agencies. Termination of the agreement does not terminate your authority for us to process data in relation to the agreement.

With regards to the time information relating to this agreement will be held by the credit reference agencies, you have been correctly advised that it will be 6 years from the date of last entry. Whilst this is an industry standard period with which we comply, The Information Commissioners Guidance on defaults also confirms this is the period for which default information will remain on file.

As such i confirm that the credit reference agency records created in relation to this agreement have been in accordance with the Data Protection Act and will not be removed.

 

 

 

Any ideas for what next?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
hi all,

in 2000 i lost my job and defaulted on a loan with black horse.

is there a time limit in which they have to default an account?

it was actually regd on my file in aug 2004.

any advice greatly appreciated

thanks

 

Martin, Did they issue you with a default notice in 2000. ?

 

If they Did, do you still have a copy of the default notice and how long after the default notice did they close the loan account.

 

If its the case that they issued a default notice, in say, july 2000 and terminated the agreement, in say, august 2000 then the default date on your credit file would be july 2000.

 

Lenders have a duty to ensure that information they provide to the credit reference agencies is accurate, so if the foregoing applies to your circumstances then you have a good case to approach the credit reference agencies with a copy of the default from 2000 and insist that they correct the information they hold on you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

There was no default notice received at all.

 

They just placed a default marker on my account in 08-2004.

Ive now complained to the ICO and am awaiting their response.

 

If i get no joy there it will be off to court for not complying with statutory request.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I wrote to the ICO but they have such a backlog of complaints it can take 8 - 10 weeks to get a proper response from them so i also penned another one to black arse. i rang them last week to make sure they had received it, which they had and he also said that he would reply the following day.That was a week ago and heard no more as yet.

 

My point in the latest letter being that the date of the default is 4 and a half years later than it should be. See if this goes anywhere.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...