Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The TRUTH about "MCS", "Metropolitan Collection Services Ltd"


netg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4819 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, I've just been listening with interest at the phone calls to MCS. I've had some good advise from another member on another thread but I thought I'd ask the guys on here as well.

HSBC are chasing me for £2000 worth of CC debt which I already told them I couldn't afford to pay, but so much for that they demanded it back anyway. So I'm getting threatening letters from MCS.

The other member told me to send a letter with a postal order requesting some info (I didn't quite understand it) they hadn't got the letter up to yesterday.

I am going to pay the amount but can't afford to pay the majority till the end of the month. (I'm having to borrow it from a friend)

I have a couple of questions:

My mum thinks I should call and explain that I will pay them a lump sum now and the majority by the end of the month (But the other guy told me not to call them under any circumstances) Should I call?

Can they charge me more than the £2200 I owe in interest? Will I owe them or will my account go back to HSBC (They wont discuss it with me)

I am worried and confused about all the stuff I have heard about them not being governed by the British rules and regs.

It's very confusing that they are owned by HSBC yet are threatening me with Bailiffs!

do you think I should send the partial payment and a covering letter as oppose to ringing them?!

Somone helpppppp me pllllllease! :confused:

 

 

Lee is right, start a thread in the debt collection forum and take a read through here too http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/84273-oft-debt-collection-guidance.html

 

 

Take no twaddle off these people, stay in control ( or get in control! :D )

 

A1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Here's a recent line of communication in progress with Metropolitan.

 

Mr. AB & Mrs CD Madeupname,

Dun Payin,

123, Bilkers Crescent,

Debtford Road,

Suckerborough,

Insolventshire.

DM1 – 2BB 6th February 2010

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Your ref: 1234567

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: METROPOLITAN COLLECTION SERVICES.

With reference to your demand for payment of a purported debt on behalf of HSBC – received here today - we would inform you this concerns a mis-sold PLP insurance policy product that is currently under investigation by the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Financial Services Authority.

Thus while such is under adjudication we have informed HSBC this matter is in FORMAL DISPUTE and have suspended any and all further payments until the FOS’s decision is given.

In keeping with directives from the FOS we are instructed to pass on all demands and communications from HSBC , or its contracted / affiliated collection agents, to their offices.

All further communications from yourselves, including the most recent of the 30th January 2010, will thus be directed to their offices.

Further to this, and contrary to the time schedule mentioned in your demand, we received a Default Notice from HSBC on the 3rd February 2010 informing us we are required to pay what they claim is an outstanding amount by the 22nd February – whereas you are threatening legal action if the purportedly outstanding sum is not paid within seven days from the date of your letter – the 30th January – dated ‘a full seven days’ before we received your demand.

With regard to Metropolitan’s repeated and incessant phone calls that commenced at 8;45 pm on the evening of the 4th February from your listed offshore South-East Asian 0500 992299 number to the personal and private mobile phone of Mrs. CD Madeupname – a new phone and number never provided to HSBC – and also to our home landline - these repeated calls constitute harassment and as threats have been made by verbally aggressive call centre staff regarding the disputed responsibility for payment of the outstanding loan premiums, these calls have been recorded and the matter reported to OFCOM and our local Suckerborough Police Service for investigation and action.

We thus call on Metropolitan Collection Services and their contracted call centre agents to Cease and Desist forthwith pursuing this medium of constant psychological harassment.

On speaking with Metropolitan’s listed 0500992299 phone number we were met with an automated message of "Thank you for calling Metropolitan Collection Services Limited” but were surprised to find we were not connected to your listed Birmingham office but rather passed to a call centre operator in the Philippines - who then informed us we would have to call back later - when the supervisor was on shift (8 hour time difference).

Disturbingly this person had access not only to our names and addresses and dates of birth etc but also our bank account sort code and account number – but amazingly was not aware who they were actually working for – stating they were employed by – to quote – a ‘global service company’.

With the Republic of the Philippines being renowned for a culture of graft and corruption which permeates their society and all levels of a government system that has historically constituted no more than a series of calamitous Kleptocracies, we question the sagacity and due prudence exercised by HSBC and their Metropolitan Collection Services department regarding the security of HSBC client’s personal details and affiliated data protection by the very fact they employ the services of unregulated Third World agencies.

Thus we consider it unsafe to communicate further with this call centre at the number provided by Metropolitan as the Philippines is in no way bound by UK data protection laws or banking standards and regulations.

Further, given that this 0500 992299 connects to a most dubious overseas-based call centre, we could well be speaking with a Nigerian 419 [problem] operator.

According to Companies House records ‘Metropolitan Collection Services Ltd’ is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the HSBC Group and not an independent service company as perjuriously professed and maintained by the call centre supervisor.

To close, if this initial representation by Metropolitan Collection Services is a prime example of HSBC’s ‘Customer Service’ policy, then we have seen better organized riots.

Yours sincerely,

Mr. Arthur Madeupname Mrs Chlamydia Madeupname

cc : Financial Ombudsman Service

: Financial Services Authority

: Office of Fair Trading / Consumer Direct

: Consumer Action Group

: Sue, Grabbit & Runne, Solicitors

: Ian Hislop – Private Eye magazine – ‘In the Back’ business section

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

This thread has been really helpful for me - thanks to all the Companies House geeks!

 

HSBC have told me that my loan has been passed to MCS and that I should make repayments to MCS and correspond with MCS. Is this not a bit daft given their relationship with HSBC? I imagine any benefit they hope to get from this nonsense depends on MCS being seen as a separate DCA?

 

I think I read somewhere that MCS were actually easier to deal with than HSBC and would negotiate ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...