Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Disciplinary while under a doctor's note


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

and our governments whining about zimbawia?? ok not spelt right, but i'm to angry to care, sorry. take a look closer to home *^"#@9

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi fiesty, i've today spoke to an employment lawyer, they say the only way i could take it further is if they have not paid me notice. well they did today. i can't even take it to a tribunal to clear my name because the only award, in a case of wrongful dismissal is payment of notice, they paid me notice so i have no claim,,,,,

 

yep it's wrong, but it seems to be legal:mad:

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't faff around, get an employment law specialist and sue the buggers for unfair dismissal. I am pretty sure in these circumstances, you have a case. i would particularly advise you to get advice on the disability discrimination implications.

Edited by tomterm8

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to an employment specialist today, he said the only claim i can put in (because i've only been employed for 11 months) is for my notice pay, if they have paid this (which they have) then i can't take them to a tribunal, not even to clear my name and to prevent them putting my so called poor attendence record (no matter how ill i am) on any future reference, wrong i know, but it appears that being a white, English male, with no recognised disabilty and straight, out weights my rights to a fair hearing. I know i sound bitter, but thats because i am

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you know the most annoying thing about all this,,, if i'd contracted any one of these illness's next month, i'd be protected, no problem, could anyone explain to me how this is right......

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and 1 other point is that i know of at least 1 other person, who has had more time off sick than me, and SHE has been there 2 months less than me, and SHE is being considered for promotion,,,,,,,,,,,,,I'm not willing to drop her in it though,,, we are good friends and i've lost enough without losing my friends,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,how wrong is this

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not good,,,,,the meeting was adjorened due to health grouds, my health, i was a jibbering wreck, they made sure of that...........................

it seems that i am wasting my time, they have today paid me my notice. so i can't take this any further, even though they have disregarded my very limited rights, they have disregarded stat min procedure, HSE regs, thier own company policy, employment laws, i cannot take this any further, they quoted the same sentence for every point i raised,,,,

my advise to anyone who has been dismissed is, if they have not been employed for over 12 month is, however wrongly, is if you recieved notice, then save yourselves the hassle and heartache, and just roll over and play dead, YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS, JUST GIVE UP, NO MATTER HOW WRONG THE DECISION IS, JUST MOVE ON, even though the company has shown they have a blatant disreguard for

1, laws.

 

 

2. HSE regs

3, their own co policy.

4, stat min procedure.

5, duty of care

 

C allen, I don't understand, if they have broken the law then surely it doesn't matter what they are sayin now? Are they legally right in what they have done? You say they have disregarded all of the above, in which case doesn't that mean that you have grounds to fight it?

 

I know you are poorly and it is not worth your health to go after these scumsuckers, but I'm just having difficulty understanding? What are the consequences of them doing what they have done in each instance, aren't they answerable to anyone about why they have done it?

 

 

if I thought that i had any chance i would go for it,, without a doubt,,,, injustice in any form is my pet hate, unfortuneatly it does apper i can't advance this without risking my home, ie. if i lose then i'm liable for their cost's. yes they have ignored ALL my very limited rights, but i have no re-course in law i.e,, unless i've been employed for 12 months, then i can only claim WRONGFULL DISMISSAL, the only award for wrongful dismissal is, notice as per contract,, they have already paid that, so i have NOT GOT A CLAIM,,,,,,, boy am i mad about that!!!!!

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So sorry things did not go your way today(apologies, I do feel awful for asking on your other thread now I have read what has happened today).

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly there are b*******s around, and if a lawyer says you'd be risking that much, you have to take their advice.

 

nevertheless, once you get your next job I'd be very tempted to sell your story to a paper :)

 

So, more importantly. when are they going to diagnose whether you have skin cancer or not?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

monday it gets cut out, then sent for testing, dunno how long that will take to come through though:(

OK I GIVE IN

 

Halifax £3600 charges, won with C/I £6400

 

NatWest S.A.R-05/06/06

Bug**r all recieved 03/11/06

Prelim guesimate sent for £3000 03/11/06

Cr*p one CONNED statements 08/06 ROFLMAO

Cr*p one charges=£976

con int 34.9% £1,003.75 £1,979.75.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...