Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just started my claim against Nat West for PPI on a loan I took out in October 2005. (I successfully claimed back over £3000 in bank charges last year and have had nothing but hassle with this bank ever since).

 

I arranged the loan over the phone with my local branch. The guy never mentioned PPI but when I received the paperwork to sign they had added it on to the loan. I rang to query it but was basically told I could not have the loan without it. I needed the loan so signed it.

 

I recently wrote to them saying I beleive the PPI was missold and requested they cancel it immediately and requested a refund of all PPI I had paid. I only have 4 more payments so it adds up to quite a bit.

 

They have replied today and asked me to fill in a questionaire before they will look into my complaint fully. Is this just a delaying tactic? has anyone else rec'd one of these questionaires. Do I need to fill it in to proceed with the claim.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Jane

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say it's a delaying tactic! Like you my first claim was for bank charges and I learnt alot - the main thing was not to play their games ;)

 

My plan of attack is (and has been sucsessful)....

 

1. Hit them with a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)

2. Get my facts together and write requesting a full refund and a response within 14 days (I ignore their questionares and 8 weeks to investigate b*llsh*t)

3. After 14 days, I send a letter before action giving them a further 7 days!

4. After 7 days, start court claim and for good measure report to FOS, FSA, OFT and Trading Standards as appropriate!

------------------------------------------------------------

 

First Direct - Refund of Bank Charges...... **WON** (Offered full amount of £5200 2 days before court)

 

Amex - Refund of charges..... **WON** (£330 refunded without much fight)

 

First Plus PPI - **WON** (Full Refund of over £7000 + Interest)

Norton Finance - Owe me over £6000 for mis-sold PPI - Starting court action in the new year!

Barclaycard PPi - Ongoing (Being complete tos*ers!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Had a response from NatWest. Basically get lost. State the policy was optional and I signed the forms to accept this.

 

Yes I signed the forms because I was told I had to have it. They say the member of staff filled out a duty of care checklist to state it was explained to me??? Just becasue they fill out a form doesn't prove it was fully explained.

 

I am going to persue a complaint through the Ombudsman and will request copies of all this documentation from Nat West.

 

My question is - In my initial letter I asked them to cancel the PPi. This is not mentioned in their response. Do they have to cancel the PPI even thought the loan has now been running for a couple of years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can still cancel the PPI(PLP) policy and it would be worth asking NatWest to confirm that this has been done.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello jane,

 

welcome to the PPI forum. :)

 

I have just started my claim against Nat West for PPI on a loan I took out in October 2005. (I successfully claimed back over £3000 in bank charges last year and have had nothing but hassle with this bank ever since).

 

I arranged the loan over the phone with my local branch. The guy never mentioned PPI but when I received the paperwork to sign they had added it on to the loan. I rang to query it but was basically told I could not have the loan without it. I needed the loan so signed it.

 

I recently wrote to them saying I beleive the PPI was missold and requested they cancel it immediately and requested a refund of all PPI I had paid. I only have 4 more payments so it adds up to quite a bit.

 

They have replied today and asked me to fill in a questionaire before they will look into my complaint fully. Is this just a delaying tactic? has anyone else rec'd one of these questionaires. Do I need to fill it in to proceed with the claim.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

the brown bold italics underlined means you can happily send your complaint to the FOS if you get nowhere with your claim and they will look at it and make an adjudication on your case. Bad news it can take 9 months.

 

the red.......A loan cannot be tied to the addition of PPI

 

the blue......They can request information from you to assist them in getting all you information, but it is not mandatory that you complete it.

 

the grey..... yes they will delay you for as long as possible.

 

the bold......yes I did filled it in to my satisfaction and terms you do not need to fill it in to proceed but it may help.

 

Have you sent a Subject Access request?

if not I would advise you to do it as this will mean them having to give you a copy of that duty of care checklist.

 

Please see the information in here.....

Payment protection | Were you mis-sold PPI? | PPI - the rules

 

in the meantime write a letter send it special next day delivery (expensive but traceable) asking for an immediate cancellation of your PPI policy..

 

Hope this gets you on the road to reclaiming.

 

any more questions just post someone will try to answer you

 

Good luck:)

 

aa

 

 

PS also check out the information in here it may help very long but useful info

 

links

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks alanalana.

 

I really appreciate your comments.

 

In their response they listed all the documents they had used to come to their decision which included the duty of care checklist. He said I could have copies of all these if I wish.

 

I have sent them a letter (special delivery) requesting this information as offered so that I can refer it to the ombudsman.

 

I don't care that it will take 9 months. This is my last link to Nat West and will take it as far as I can. Only got 3 more loan payments then I can close my account once and for all.

 

I have also asked that he cancel the PPI (again).

 

I await their reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello jane,

 

well good luck I will follow to see how you get on:wink:

 

KEEP AT THEM.

 

If they make life difficult for you then make life difficult for them.:cool:

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...