Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

jilly1973 vs abbey help please how to get started


jilly1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

Everyone

I have been looking around the site and reading many cases .Please help me how do i get started ??I have no statements how do i get these and will i be charged for each one?

 

Thanks in advance now going to take another look myself at the FAQ.

jilly1973

Link to post
Share on other sites

All the info to get started is in the FAQs - and step by step guide you'll find there.

 

Good luck

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep just read through the FAQ and we'll help you through it if you have any other questions, it can get a bit confusing at times but just take your time and read through the forum.

 

best wishes

Natasha

 

Abbey-received DPA letter on 13/03, received some breakdown till 2004 waiting for the more recent ones(where most charges occurred)

sent reminder email on 17/4/06

called abbey on 19/04/06 to remind them:rolleyes:

sent another email on 26/04/06:mad:

Approx charges £2500

received £500 refund in dec 06

sent LBA

Capital one- sent DPA letter 17/03

Sent prim letter for charges of £260 14/04

Received a refund £109 awaiting further refund of £151

Settled IN FULL

Barclay card- Sent DPA letter 17/03 sent reminder 14/04

received info claiming £120

settled in FULL

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

Thanks for all the replys .I got over loaded with info and got confused .Have now re-read all the FAQ and understand more now the 1st letter is in the post to request bank statements.

This is a great site you peeps are so kind .

Good luck everyone with your conquest .!!!We has the consumers will fightback!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi

Just a up date ,I decided to go for the abbey and halifax.

 

My 1st letter back from the halifax :

 

my letter :

Completion of request for a list of transactions and charges

 

Thank you for your letter requesting specific information on your account with us.I can confirm the copies of duplicate statements have been ordered and will be sent under seperate cover.

 

With regard to your request for information relating to manual intervention o your account ,HBOS plc is under no statutory obligation to record this information and therfore,I am unable to assist further with your request.

yours faithfully

Nicola inett

data protection consultant

 

 

I dont understand the second part of the letter i used the template from here .

please can someone assist me.

thanks

Jill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Here is my 1st letter back from the Abbey.:

 

Thank you for your letter dated 8th july 2006, Requesting information on your bank account. I also acknowledge receipt of you 10.00 fee.

 

I also would like to advise you that under a data protection act request, You will only receive transactions that are currently held on our systems. These will be forwarded to you within 40 days, Free of charge, Under seperate cover.Any earlier transactions have been archived on to microfiche, Which is not covered by the data protection act. These archive transactions will not therefore be supplied to you under a data protection act request and will not be subject to the 40 day ruling.

 

Abbey is not normally required to hold past transaction details on accounts for more than six years, We're therefore unable to give you all the details you've asked for.

 

We can however supply details of the transactions held on the microfiche on payment of an administration fee of 10.00 for multiply monthly statements per account that have been archived.

 

It is clear from your request that you require the transactional information that is held on the microfiche records. In order to avoid any additional delays, we will therefore use the 10.00 that you have sent with your data protection act request, as payment for the microfiche records that you need. If you do not want us to do this, please call us on the above number.

 

You have also asked for details of any 'manual interventions' that may have been made on your account and I am sorry that we are unable to help with this request.

 

I can explain we consider 'manual interventions' to mean an action that is not automatic or computer driven. Not all manual interventions are recorded, for example if a member of staff looks at a paper document relating to your account, a record is not always required. Similarly some interventions may relate to work carried out by a department rather than individuals where no central record of activity is kept because this is not the kind of information we need,or more importantly, that a customer would request.

 

If you have any questions please call us on the above number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

Karnevil

 

I have had 18 months of statements back since last week ,So just waiting.

 

I did receive a statement of some sort for a period of 15/4/2005 to 26/4/05 on top of one of the pieces it says Contract staff movements enquiry.

I have had nothing since thou.

 

I shall now go and do what you have said with the microfiche letter.

Thanks for all your help .

 

cheers

Jilly

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can explain we consider 'manual interventions' to mean an action that is not automatic or computer driven. Not all manual interventions are recorded, for example if a member of staff looks at a paper document relating to your account, a record is not always required. Similarly some interventions may relate to work carried out by a department rather than individuals where no central record of activity is kept because this is not the kind of information we need,or more importantly, that a customer would request.

 

If this is the case how do they calculate their costs then, as abbey consistantly say the penalty charges are a direct reflection of the cost incurred.

 

I had the same response you have had still waiting for the information requested, but able to go ahead with my claim for charges. I suggest going with an estimated claim, this may prompt them to send the info you requested in your DPA request.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a update I did send the microfiche argument letter on the 10th august 2006 and it was signed for on the 11th august ,I still have had no response to this letter.

What shall i do.

 

Thanks jill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another update :I have received this morning a full copy of Archived Movements?? What are these this is not account statements are they??

 

I also received a letter from them in a seperate envelope and it says:

 

Dear Miss *****

 

Thank you for contacting us and i am sorry that you have been unhappy that you have felt you must complain.

 

One of my team members will be responsible for investigating your complaint and i have enclosed our complaints leaflet,which explains our procedure for doing this.High quality customer service is of great importance to us at abbey and we will do everything we can to resolve your complaint in a timely and safisfactory manner .

 

I know it is important to you that we resolve your complaint quickly,but we want to do a through investigation and sometimes this can take time.If we have have not contacted you before then,We will write to you in four weeks to let you know what is happening.

 

Although i do not know what the outcome will be,I do hope that we will be able to find a solution that you are happy with.

 

yours sincerley

 

Head of complaints.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now understood that this morning archive movements are the actual statements.sorry this is alot to take in....

 

I have been through them and total it up to being £5858.50 in charges and £1186.39 in interest debit totalling = £7044.89.

Now i shall send in the preliminary letter in.

Shall update soon as

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You are on the road to getting your money back. Plenty of help here so don't worry. Stick to the time table set by you and should have no problems. I have just issued my claim for £8439.53 (£250 court costs incl.) on 30/08/06, received paperwork from court next day, shame the banks were not so efficient concidering the huge profits they make. Also read on this site that Abbey credit card and capital one have reduced their charges to £12, so as good as admitting their charges unlawful, well good enough for me. Best wishes.

 

Regards bish

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thank you bish for your help everyone is good on here.

 

I wish you well on you claim also,.

 

I to have noticed abbey is not charging me overdraft interest anymore since putting the claim in.They where charging me around £80.00 a month in interest but have stopped this now so i am on a winner already thanks to you lot and this site.....Just got to get the bulk back now ........

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

I received a letter today from abbey

Dear *****

 

As you know,we are currently investigating your complaint that you raised with abbey four weeks ago .I am sorry for the delay you are experiencing and i would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your continued patience.

 

Our research is taking longer than expected because we want to make sure a full investigation is done.

 

If we are unable to complete our investigation beforehand,we will write to you again in four weeks time to let you know how we are getting on.

 

I am sorry that it is taking longer than originally thought and would like to reassure you that your complaint is very important to us.

 

yours sincerely

marc winder

 

I assume this is a standard letter to buy time with shall i jus twait the 14 days (which is the 19th september )and then send them the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-letter-before-action-consumer.html is this the right template to send them after the prelim letter as gone in.

 

Thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...