Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I bought my house 2 years ago. The previous owner had died. I continue to recieve parking fines and communication from DVLA in the name of the dead person, despite contacting DVLA via post to inform them I am the new owner of the property. I have sent them proof of purchase and ownership but the communications continue to arrive. Aside from using "return to sender", does anyone have any idea how to stop this and get DVLA to update their records? Not sure if relevant but the Tax class on the vehicle is disabled meaning that the price of vehicle tax is £0 per year. I assume someone is using this to get free vehicle tax which is up to them, but I'm bored of fighting with parking charge companies and getting threatening letters, as whoever is doing this is also not very good at paying for parking.
    • I haven't heard of them asking for photographic evidence in this way before – but I don't think it will really pose a problem. Have you got a history of sending parcels which were then lost and you had to claim for? When you send your letter of claim? Was the item properly declared? Was the item correctly valued? Please answer these questions and then take at least a couple of days reading very thoroughly the stories on this sub- forum. There are lots of them. Read some of the pinned topics at the top which will explain the principles and then read the stories to see other people's experience. Post up your letter of claim in PDF format so we can see what you sent.  
    • Just to clarify - it was the lender who undertook works, not me.  They racked up huge huge sums in refurb costs - which were completely unnecessary.  They have been trying to charge all the costs to me.  I refuse to be held accountable in my defence and counterclaim.   (I refuse to  be held liable for these works costs whether vat was or wasn't added - I maintain its the lender that must cover the costs).  It was a ridiculous sum of money and made no difference to their ability to sell either.  As its still unsold.    I can see - from disclosure paperwork - that the lender ceo uses this contractor all the time on other properties - for himself and for the bank.  The payer may not be responsible for the contractor's failure to add vat - but the ceo can clearly see it's not being charged - and again and again on all his jobs.  So he is complicit even if not guilty of the actual fraud.    I admit I'm angry with them. The sheer injustice and arrogance (that they could/ can do whatever they want and get away with it - has been astounding.  It's why I have fought so hard to get justice.  This particular issue is just another niggle.  They think they are above the law; can circumvent it - with no consequences / repercussions.    Thank you dx for pointing me to the link. I will now follow that up
    • I have posted the letter off today - sent recorded delivery, so should get to the Police early next week. I also walked along the street where this happened and checked if there were any CCTV cameras or video door bells in that section of the road, but could only find one. I talked to the owners of the house with the camera but they say it is set to only cover the area leading up to the house and not really the pavement or road and footage also auto deletes after 72 hours, so anything captured would be gone now. That was disappointing. I walked along the road a bit more, but couldn't see any other video door bells or CCTV, so that didn't help.  I always thought most people have at least a video door bell these days but not in that road... 😐 So came home a bit disappointed.  If anything else happens I will post an update here, but may not be for a week or so. Not sure how long this will take now.
    • Hi all.   I've just cancelled my Virgin Media because my Wife and I are going abroad for 12 months or so. My Son will be staying in our home, and wishes to start a contract with them. He signed up to a great deal for New Customers online, and a Contract Agreement was signed online. He had a delivery date for a Self Installation Kit but it never arrived. After speaking to numerous Virgin Media Staff online, they are insisting that he calls their Pre Installation Team (I presume that is their sales Team to try and get more money). He doesn't want to speak to them over the phone. He doesn't mind doing a Live Chat, but he hasn't got an Account Number yet, so that's impossible. He even had a chat with a Team Member on Whatsapp, who say they don't have access to the information they need, so he has no option but to call them. Why can't they just be straightforward with their Communications? Is there any other option other than calling them?   TIA.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest/HL - claimform Cap1 debt *OH gave in £30PCM*


rogermeard
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 232
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

just a thought, but, there is no pleaded admission or denial, so, i would advise adding say before para 5,

 

Notwithstanding matters pleaded, it is denied that the Claimant has established a cause of action or that the claimant has a valid claim against the defendant.

 

just something that i often add to Defences within my day job

 

Hope this helps

 

If its before Para 5, does that mean it becomes part of Para 5?. Or just on its own between section e para 4 and prior to para 5?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check out post 78 again i have amended it...dont forget to fill in the dates, and where the xxxs are, print it out and see how it looks

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCm,

 

I have requested the CCA a couple of times from C'quest, but only once did i enclose the £1 postal order, is a CCA request not valid if the £1 postal order is not sent with it?

 

With my defence you refer to Letters marked Exhibit A etc , do i actually enclose these with the defence and if i do is it copies or originals i enclose?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only valid cca request is the one sent with the £1, so use that one

 

Exhibits are photocopies of the originals, attach copies with the defence

 

Suggest you send it by SD, dont send a copy to the other side

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update..........

 

Sent the Defence off to court today.....however the claimants solicitors have sent us (received today) a copy of the alleged agreement with some sort of terms attached, a printout of purchases, a dubious letter from the original creditor as a letter/deed of assignment and a letter from them that came in the same enevelope as the deed/letter saying they have bought the debt etc etc.

 

What do i do now, we have sent our defence earlier than the post arriving typical. Is my defence the same and is this the docs i asked for in the CPR 31.14 because its just a load of copies of docs i keep getting off them when i CCA'd them.

 

Blimey, just get in from work faced with this and a sick child as well, someone up there is testing me!!:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rogermeard. Given that we know who's involved now, could you delete all your personal and account references and post up the documents?

 

I think that really would help the experts take your case to another level and get a bit closer to filleting their donkey (gulp).

 

Are any of the documents new?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry too much about the letter today, if/when it gets to the next stage AQs, you will require them to produce all the documents they will be relying on.

 

when you have some time you could post up what they have sent, you can upload the scans to photobucket, and paste the link into your thread, theres no rush, and you dont have to, try to chill:cool:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

The docs are all just the same stuff i have had on 3 seperate occasions from them, the only new bit is stapled to the alleged agreement which states terms etc, but i don't hold much interest in that particular document;).

 

I guess this will end up in a hearing. So i'm sitting tight for now.......will chillout but a tad stressed today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO RELEVANCE TO THIS CASE, HOWEVER SOMETHING TO REALLY CHEER ME UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..............

 

 

I checked my current account online today to see what i had in there and was totally shocked!!!!!!!

 

I have had for over 8 yrs an arranged/authorised overdraft of £3850 which i am usually well into.

 

However today overnight my Overdraft has changed from £3850 down to £900 leaving me nearly £2600 in an UNAUTHORISED overdraft which they are demanding back at 10% a month and my account is on hold, i can't buy food or anything and i have been told to phone their Customer relations Dept on monday as i may have a case for reinstating my OD as they never wrote me any letters online or by paper.

 

Has this happened to many people , it just seems a way of claiming extra payments back at customers expense, i am completely stuffed now. Been with them for over 20 years, thats customer service for you!!!!!!

 

If i open an account with someonelse will i be accepted as i am a debtor to the Halifax overnight!!!!!!!!!!

 

WHAT A WEEK.............

Link to post
Share on other sites

All banks are doing this now, they want to reduce the amount owed to them by debtors, at the same tome gaining more revenue, however they should have given you notice of their intentions, and made some sort of arrangement to reduce the overdraft limit over time....maybe you can reach an agreement with them on monday on this

 

Following that open a new account with a bank unconnected with any of your creditors. (if you have other creditors who are connected to your bank, they will use the offset clause, to clear your account in favour of their debt)

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, i keep warning people on here that when they begin defaulting on obligations, to take all necessary precautions to protect themselves (i.e. a parachute bank account, where all your income goes in, and only priority payments go out), this does not include "unsecured debt"

 

They dont always take the advice, and thats where they end up in this sort of situation

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what your saying, but my current account is nothing to do with any of my debt, only the official arranged/authorised overdraft that i have had for more than 8 years and it was them that gave it to me, i didn't ask for it either. I have done nothing wrong with my account or anything it's just them they have changed it overnight NO warning what so ever. To make it worse its my tax payer money that is keeping these going!!!.

 

I feel totally abused and robbed, its like being mugged legally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...