H.O.L Test case appeal. Judgement Declared. ***See Announcements***

[pugsley]

Don't really know why the judge had to talk about the charges not being penalties now according to the terms which are now easier to understand, and not go into detail about historical terms being penalties and not easy to understand, seems like a job half done.

[pugsley]

Constitution of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

 

 

maybe he has studied law and considers that we have an unwritten constitution (hey that's what I was taught at law school), it is subject to debate though obviously

 

 

 

The Constitution of the United Kingdom is the uncodified body of law and convention under which the United Kingdom is governed.

Because the UK has no single codified documentary constitution along the lines of the Constitution of the United States, it is often said that the country has an "unwritten constitution".[1] However, the majority of the British constitution does exist in the written form of statutes, court judgments and European treaties. The constitution does have some unwritten sources, including parliamentary constitutional conventions (more than most countries except New Zealand and Israel) and the royal prerogatives.

The bedrock of the British constitution is the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty, according to which the statutes passed by Parliament are the UK's supreme and final source of law. It follows that Parliament can change the constitution simply by passing new Acts of Parliament. However UK membership of the European Union the European Communities Act 1972 means the UK applies all EU law (and disapplies any provisions of its own which conflict) that it passes in common with other member states.[2] Changing attitudes may also be seen among the judiciary: for example, the judgments of the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords in the Jackson litigation arising out of the Hunting Act 2004 indicate that senior judges may no longer necessarily be prepared to view Acts of Parliament as sacrosanct.[3] These developments are not without their opponents.

[pugsley]

I thought the last paragraph was clear, so maybe some of my studying has sunk in afterall

 

Universal suffrage (also universal adult suffrage, general suffrage or common suffrage) consists of the extension of the right to vote to all adults, without distinction as to race, sex, belief, intelligence, or economic or social status.

In the first modern democracies only a limited number of people had a say in the running of the government - for example in the United Kingdom only Protestant, male landowners with relatively large holdings had the right to vote. Suffrage depended on local custom before 1832, so there were exceptions. In all modern democracies the number of people who could vote increased gradually with time. The 19th century featured movements advocating universal male suffrage - the extension to all males regardless of social standing or race. The democratic movement of the late 19th century, unifying Liberals and Social Democrats, particularly in northern Europe, used the slogan Equal and Common Suffrage. The Movement for Universal Suffrage consisted of a social, economic and political movement aimed at extending suffrage to people of all races.

[pugsley]

Thanks for the update, not been on here much lately but have tried to keep up with this thread

 

will donate soon

 

Sandy xx

[pugsley]

Well the ruling has ignited my interest in the subject of bank charges again, I am just one person of many thousands. I can be a royal pain in the a*se when I think there is injustice and this goes for whether I have outstanding claims or not.

 

bring it on