Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Referring back to to your initial post... So not a judgment ?
    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

council parking tickets + bailifts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

firstly i would like to say this is my first post on this site but i have been looking around quite a lot and this is a really good site with very helpfull people on here:)

 

right the problem i have is 5 parkintg tickets issued by brighton and hove council. apparently broghton and hove is suposed to be one opf the worst places in uk for the amount of parking tickets issued! which i

can belive as they drive around in cars, bikes, and people carriers!

 

my question is thier anything that i can do about this. ibs has now told me that i owe them £565 for 5 parking tickets! :o

 

dont get me wrong i pay my way in the world but i got these tickets because where i used to live was the closest you could park to the city center witout paying for parking and my road was allways buisy:mad:

so i had to park on yellow lines but i will say i never caused an obstruction to anyone or anything.

 

any help will be very much appreciated

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

What paperwork were you sent by the council and what did you do with it?

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i cant rember whqat i got exactly but i do have all the original parking tickets and a letter stating the will look into the situation couple stating they wont cancel the pcn

 

i have been told by the bailifts that i need to contact the parking office in hove if i have a issue with the tickets

 

to be honest i dont kow what to say to them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you recall receiving anything called a "Notice To Owner".

This is a statutory document that gives you the statutory right to appeal against the PCNs.

If you didn't receive it you can complete a "Statutory Declaration" to try and get the debt set aside and get back to the Notice to Owner stage.

You will then have the choice of appealing against the PCNs (at the full rate) but you have no chance of paying the discounted rate. If you lose the appeal and then pay it will not cost any more.

If you received but ignored the Notices to Owner or if you had not kept your address up to date with the DVLA, I suggest your statutory declaration will be likely to be refused.

********************************************

Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.

The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.

I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.

Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff has told you the wrong info. You DO NOT need to contact Brighton & Hove Parking Office.

 

If you did not receive a Notice to Owner then you should consider filing an OUT OF TIME late Statutory Declaration.

 

Many applications are rejected as the applicant provides the incorrect info on the forms.

 

The form asks you to provide the reason why you did not receive the Notice to Owner etc. Unless you have moved home, you will need to say that you "I do not know the reason why I did not receive the Notice to Owner"..........which is true.....how can you possibly know the reason why you did not receive this Notice.

 

Filing an Out of Time will also ensure that bailiff action will cease until such time as the application has been decided at TEC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have not recieved the notice to owner and are now questioning these tickets you need to file as the others have said a stat dec with the court I think it is here as you might possibly have had a letter from them before they bailiff was sent maybe not.

 

Northampton County Court Bulk Centre

4th floor, St Katharine's House,

21-27 St Katharine's Street,

Northampton Northamptonshire

England

NN1 2LH

 

DX 702885 Northampton 7

 

This is where the councils send the PCN'S after non payment .

 

I had a bailiff come round for £900 a month or so back , I said what are they for he got clever I said Stat Dec ,he went off with his tail between his legs.

 

If you do this it returns to the original stage and no bailiff costs if you then pay when requested.

 

You can also if you want look up online the 1689 arguement

I did and brought it up with this court and the Judge sent it back as he could not make a ruling on it ,he did not have the power he told me to go back to the council. Never heard anymore.

 

I hate parking fine robery and bailiff bully boys theycon people into paying,just watch them on tv "can I come in to sort it out for you " NO YOU CANNOT . They con people into letting them in and once in you cannot stop them .Do not let them in if its raining all the better

Link to post
Share on other sites

i did move and i left the logbook address at my parents. i never recieved any nto's as my dad allways sent them back to sender.

 

i think i will fill out the out of time declaration this will give me some time and hopefully stop the bailifts hounding me.

 

do i have to fill out a form for each pcn and do you guys know where i get them from and send them to

 

 

thanks so much for all your help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

when the bailiff called last time I asked him for a form as I thought he should carry one and he told me to go to the council to get one .

Ask Neil Herron for more details he is a great mind of information I have learnt much from him

Tell him steve from carmarthen sent you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You get the forms from here:

Northampton County Court Bulk Centre

4th floor, St Katharine's House,

21-27 St Katharine's Street,

Northampton Northamptonshire

England

NN1 2LH

 

DX 702885 Northampton 7

 

[email protected]

 

Tel: 0845 704 5007

Fax:0845 707 8607

They are very helpful.

 

Some sites have them too, I think there has been a link here before.

 

Here you go:

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/files/OOTApplicationPack.pdf

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, this does not help your case at all

 

i never recieved any nto's as my dad allways sent them back to sender.

 

 

IOW, you did receive them (ie the council met its obligations by sending them to the V5 address); you simply failed to act on them (by having your father return them).

 

If he returned them as 'not known at this address', then you are also opening yourself up to liability for being prosecuted for failing to keep your V5 address updated. (max. £1000 fine)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I've ever known a stat dec that wasn't 'late' - by the time you get to know about the problem, it seems to be too late... maybe that's why they come as a package.:confused:

Why aren't we revolting?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Pat Davis has correctly stated you can indeed find yourself liable for a fine for not updating your address etc with DVLA but that said, our office have assisted with literally hundreds of Out of Times, many with the same situation as yours and so far none have had any action from DVLA but most importantly nearly every case was successful at TEC.

 

I would advise telephoning TEC in the morning and ask them for the address on the Warrant to check whether the documents had been going to a previous address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...