Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help the Newbie!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5896 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

Firstly, Thank god for this site!!!!

 

Secondly I appeal to anyone for advice please, my mum is literally about to slit her wrists over this matter.

 

She is being taken to court by marlin financial, over a debt sold to them by hsbc. She has pretty much always paid the debt.

 

Upon assignment to marlin (through pheonix?????), my mum set up a direct debit to pay the debt with marlin and received a comfirmation of dd set up. She thought nothing of it until a letter demanding full payment was received. Marlin had never set up the dd.

 

Cutting things short for now, she has received court summons and we are stumped as to how to respond.

 

They have obviously added the 8% stat interest and now the amount has doubled.

 

I dont understand how they can not set up the dd, thereby choosing not to accept my mums payment and can then take her to court for twice the original debt amount.

 

IT JUST DOESNT SEEM FAIR!!!

 

Any help is much appreciated asap xxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Hello Ginger, welcome to CAG

 

Firstly, please tell your mum not to worry, things are not as bad as they seem.

 

You will need to give some more details as to whats happening, and clarification as to what paperwork/correspondance your mum's had.

 

Is this court summons from the court?, or is it a just letter from Marlin threatening it?

 

Have they supplied a statement explaining how they have come up with the figure owed, indeed, have they ever sent one?

 

It's important you get everything in order, and then we can look at ways to help your mum.

 

Please don't worry too much, you will get lots of help with this.

 

louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Louis

 

Thankyou so much for your prompt response.

 

I have only seen a scanned image of the claim form, but it is a court summons rather than a letter. here is the particulars of their claim, and a brief rundown of where my mum is up to:

 

By an agreement in writing between HSBC Banks plc (HSBC) and the defendant dated 16/09/1996 (the agreement), HSBC agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card upon the terms and conditions set out therein. In breach of the Agreement, the Defendant has failed to make payments of not less than the minimum payment shown on the monthly statment. HSBC served a default notice on the Defendant stating the sum due and requiring the Defendant to pay the same. The Defendant failed to pay & the Agreement was terminated. The Agreeemnt was assigned to the Claimant on 05/10/2007.

THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS 1. 2582.54 2. Interest at the rate pursuant to the Agreemnt namely 1651.72 & continuing until Judgement or sooner payment at the daily rate of 0.57 or in the alternative interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984. Also, interest at the rate pursuant to the Agreement from the judgement date until payment.

 

My version...............Don't remember and cannot find any copy of Default stuff (but believe this can be done without my knowledge) from HSBC. Do remember speaking to them at Debt Recovery dept years ago & they agreed it could be paid via their debt collection agency, Metropolitan Collection Services Ltd . Outstanding balance on their latest correspondence 19.05.06 was shown as £2659.54 This was paid regularly via DD at first £10, then increased to £15.00 (on 25.05.06) per month through the bank until I was advised by HSBC/Marlin simultaneously that the debt had been acquired by Phoenix t/as Marlin Financial and that the dd to hsbc was to be stopped. It was then agreed that a new DD (increased to £25.00 per month, not forgetting another account almost identical had been successfully tfrd from HSBC & payment set up by DD to Marlin & this had been running perfectly for 3 months at this point) was to be set up to pay MArlin at which point they were given bank details etc. They then sent me a letter of DD instruction confirmation, 'if details are correct , you need do nothing' , no date as to when dd was due, only amount to be taken & account details. Next thing was Claim form was received from them as they state DD was never received. My bank state they have never received a DD instruction from Marlin apart from the one already in place for £85 per month

 

We have sent a letter of complaint to marlins director, as the correspondence is being sent to my mums old house, she still owns it but does not live there.

 

We have sent the acknowledgement of service in, so we can have a bit more time to figure things out, and I have contacted the court who have said that our next response is due on the 19th march.

 

Thanks and please let me know what else i can fill you in on

 

Oh- no statement either, but i saw the template letter in the legal issues section before - is that advisable, i think it was the "request for information" letter.

Ginger

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

I can help a bit with this, but TBH, there are better people here who are experts in this, especially with court papers and what you need etc.

 

I will see if I can get someone to have a look for you.

 

louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou SO much for even showing interest.:grin:

 

My mum has always paid her bills, and she is devastated and distraught about getting a ccj, and thats the stupid thing, things have accelerated after setting up a dd to pay the blasted debt.

 

And the worst thing is, I feel like a total failure because I sit here and write this with the letters llb after my name!!!! And I just can't seem to help her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need to send the claimant a CPR18 letter, which will force them to produce whatever paperwork they intend to rely upon. I am in the midst of work, but someone will doubtless post the relevant letter soon.

 

They are probably hoping for a default judgment; alas for them, because you have found CAG they won't get one.

 

Firstly it is extremely unlikely that a valid, enforceable agreement exists for this account. HSBC probably won't be able to find the original after so long, and in any case their 'agreements' from this period didn't show the prescribed terms required by s.61 of the CCA 1974, and so are unenforceable.

 

Secondly. it is likely that the amount they are claiming consists partly of unlawful and unfair penalty charges. This will provide you with an opportunity to challenge the amount and make a counterclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One CPR letter:

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION UNDER THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES.

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I have received the Court claim filed by your Company. To enable me to file a defence and counter-claim, I require specific information regarding the account to be provided forthwith. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below. This letter supersedes the Data Protection request made to on the **DATE**. The information must be furnished by the **DATE**, which gives you ten days to provide what has been requested. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

a. A transcript of all transactions, including charges, fees, interest, repayments and payments and both the original amount of the loan and any repayments made to it the account.

b. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations

c. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with **CREDITOR**.

d. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

e. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

f. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

g. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

h. A genuine copy of any deed of assignment, or proof that you have a legal right to this money.

i. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

j. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

4. A copy of your complaints procedure, as required by the Consumer Credit Act 2006.

5. Clarification of the date you acquired the debt, what organisation you acquired it from, their registered office, their company number (if any) and what legal title they had to this debt, and what credit license number they had at the time that the debt was purchased or entered into.

 

I will require this information within the next ten days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I await your rapid response.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...