Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default from Virgin Media (EX-NTL Telewest) and Moorcroft Debt Recovery


JudoStu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5282 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, it's my first post so please bare with me (it's a long post). Very glad I found this site it's full of invaluable advice :)

 

Right, my problem.

 

I used to have an NTL account (broadband & telephone) back in late 2002, which I admit I fell into difficulties paying and as such the debt was passed over to Moorcroft.

 

I have checked my credit file recently and a few things concern me. Firstly there is a default against the Virgin/NTL account on my file, I don't ever recall receiving a default notice? Secondly, the default date is 08/2002, but according to my file the start date of the account is 20/09/2002? How can I get a default before the account is even started?

 

I phoned Virgin this morning to ask them about this problem and they said I would need to call Moorcroft and ask them as it would have been them applying the default. If that's the case why is the default against the Virgin account and not one called "Moorcroft" or something similar, especially if they purchased the debt?

 

I believe that I should be able to get this default removed from my credit file as I never (remember) received a default notice, also because of the erroneous dates detailed above. I've been reading through this site and I also believe I can request a copy of the credit agreement, which if Moorcroft can't produce the default couldn't be applied, am I right in my thinking?

 

Many thanks for taking the time to read my longish post. I hope someone more experienced can shed some light on my best path forward.

 

Thanks,

JudoStu :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the things you could do is ask them, in writing, to produce the default notice letter, and also ask for a copy of the original signed contract. Below is a draft letter you could use. Just adapt it to your own needs. And never sign anything you send to them:-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Account number - xxxxxxxxxx

 

 

After recently obtaining a copy of my credit file from Experian I was concerned to note that your company has placed a "Default" notice against my account.

 

 

Further to this I have no recollection of ever receiving such a notice, and I therefore require you to substantiate this data at your earliest convenience.

 

1 You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

 

2 Any deed of assignment if the debt was sold on

I would request that this data is provided to myself within the next 28 days, if you are unable to provide this data then I must insist that it is removed from my files as unsubstantiated.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware, sending NTL/Telewest/Virgin Media a CCA request is pointless. They fall outside of the CCA and as such the agreements are not regulated by it. I am actually unsure as to how to go about getting it removed. Ask them politely maybe.;)

Just some guy. I try to help, but all advice is my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies and info.

 

It was my understanding that if they (Virgin or Moorcroft) aren't regulated by the CCA, they can't even issue a default in the first place?

 

Is this correct?

 

Also, would I be sending the letter requesting proof of the default to Virgin or Moorcroft?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

fergal this thread is over a year old.

 

Anyway for anyone that does read this thread they send u a deafult notice under the consumer credit act.

 

I do have a thread in regards to VM with a copy of a DN on.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...