Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says.  
    • Thank you all for the responses, to answers a few questions  - she has had the car since Jan 23 on a 5 year term.  - She is unsure what the agreement is called, but at the end she has the option to make a payment to "buy" the car - she recieves benefits for her young children alongside the ssp (normally she would be on NLW for a 16 hr a week job)  - Yes she would like to keep the car  She has not responded to the last email from them asking her to call and it'll be followed up in an email. I told her to hold off until atleast Wednesday so I can read a few posts on here and get some more information.  I will ensure she follows up with a letter, that has not been signed but instead her name written.   Thank you  
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo I'll use that. @FTMDave Yep im going to do just that and calmly enjoy the process that follows.    Whats the deal with the quote thing? Is it causing an issue for the site or just an annoyance.
    • Hello, *posting on behalf of my friend, I'll provide as much info as possible*  During a pretty low point my friend moved into a social housing property, it was in a area with no family/friend connections so she started to look for a mutual exchange. She found one, signed the paper work and thought everything was okay.  She has now decided she does not want to go through with the mutual exchange. Is she legally allowed to pull out after signing the paperwork or does she have to commit to the move? Thank you,
    • Thats perfect as long as they go to my new address its all good. thanks again for the help
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Referral Charges... what are they??


a bit peeved
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6629 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been with Natwest for about a year, and no problems up to about a month ago. Every week we made a payment by cheque that hit our account on the Friday or Saturday, since hubby gets paid on a Friday this has never been a problem, been doing it for about six months and never any problems in past.

 

However about a month ago the cheque cleared on the Thursday instead!! Of course we were not expecting this and by the looks of my account it seemed that they had honoured the cheque, because it had taken us over the overdraft limit. I expected no charge being made because the account would be credited the following morning with his wages, and I was told that if the account is credited within 24 hours they do not charge... however, they decided a few days later that they were not going to pay the cheque and referred it back to the company and promptly charged us £38 (bearing in mind the cheque was only for £40.80).

 

I spoke to our branch manager and he apologised and told me that we when we get the charge letter I had to phone him back and he would refund the charge, he also told me that even though when I deposit a cheque it takes 5 days or more to clear, if I write one it can take as little as 2 days and up to 6 months to clear!!!!!! Anyway the charges were refunded back onto the account and I thought that was the last of it. Everything has been fine since then, until now.

 

This morning I have checked my account online and found that two days ago I was charged a referral charge of £30. I rang the action line and the lady told me that they charge for a cheque being referred back to the company, I informed her that I had already been charged £38 and this was refunded, and she informed me that this was in addition to the previous charge!! I have had no notification of the charge and was told that there is nothing I can do about it and the charge will stand. I don't understand how they can get away with this. She told me that it was because we went over our arranged overdraft. I told her that we had not, because the cheque was not payed at that point, and was represented the following week (which I made sure I left enough money for) I now pay the company cash because of this one incident!

 

Sorry if I have gone on a bit!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All bank customers with problems become the cash cows of the baniing industry.

How do the banks get away with it?

Most people trust the banks and assume that the charges are lawful and reasonabe.

The rest don't want to lose their accounts or risk their overdrafts being closed down.

The rest want to lives their lives without this kind of hassle and so put up and shut up.

The other 6000 come here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The referral charge is in addition to the over-limit fee - its a pity I've just found this site as I had quite a few charges 7 - 8 years ago and since then I've been borrowing and begging money to cover the occasional overdraft to avoid these charges - grrrrrr

 

 

586rJKEE4

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this on Natwests website.

 

 

Unarranged Borrowing*

If you exceed your arranged overdraft facility, or if you go overdrawn without prior arrangement: this is in addition to interest payable as detailed Unarranged borrowing details of the dates these fees are applied on can be found in our leaflet 'A guide to Personal Current Account fees and interest' £28

 

Unauthorised transaction - Unpaid

If you go overdrawn beyond your agreed overdraft amount, we may return your cheques unpaid, or be unable to pay a Standing Order or Direct Debit Unpaid fees are applied at the time the transaction is not paid or taken from your account £38 per item

 

Unauthorised transactions - Card misuse

If you use your NatWest Servicecard or Cashcard when there are insufficient funds in your account Card misuse fees are applied at the time the transaction is paid or taken from your account £35 per item

 

Paid referral

Any items we choose to pay, which result in an unarranged overdraft Paid referral fees are applied on the sixth business day of the month after the transactions took place £30 (max £90 in a calendar month)

 

Default notice

If you break your agreement with us and we have cause to issue a Default Notice to you requiring you to either repay the debt or remedy breach of agreement, we will charge you £30 for our administrative costs in issuing the Default Notice Default Notice fees are applied at the time each Default Notice is issued £30

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info cheddar, I too found that on the Natwest website, and I pointed out to the bank manager that a paid referral gets charged if they choose to pay an item which results in an unarranged overdraft, however, they never paid the item, they refused the cheque and it was represented to the bank the following week. I argued that they were therefore charging me for a service that I never received, thankfully he agreed and the charge has been reversed and will be credited back to my account over the weekend, he did however point out that they were doing this as a gesture of goodwill only!!!!!

 

Anyway problem solved and thanks for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/06/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6629 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...