Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Tories realise that they are likely to be in opposition for 10 years or more. And for those who lose their seats, they will be looking for new employment.  Sunak is like an accountant, suddenly put into a leadership role, but without the intelligence required to think in a multi dimensional way. 
    • .... So after a 14 day investigation with p2g i had a live chat with them yesterday ( 8th June) who said they didnt know where the parcel was but closed the case as i didnt take out their protectiove insurance.  So now at 07.33 on the 9th of june i was repling to this thread with all the relivent information to start a claim and i check the tracking of the 'Lost' parcel for specific dates to find the tracking has updated and the parcel is now at the recipients local depot  ? which is annoying because ive already refunded the buyer as i didnt want any negative feedback as it was an ebay listing and id want a refund if i was in his postion. So i posted the parcel with Evri on the 20/5/24  The delivery date was missed due to it being sent to the wrong depot and a case was opened on the 25/5/24 14 Investigation failed to locate the item in Evri's system and case closed on the 8/6/24 and now the tracking has updated on the 8th saying its at the recipients depot so is likey to receive it in the next few days .... Typical.  Oh well nevermind , thanks everyone  
    • Here's Tim Shipman's behind the scenes look at how the Tory campaign is going. Sunak is believed to have taken the weekend off again, party workers are refusing to help with the campaign and social media advertising has been suspended because they can't afford it. Infighting on the beaches: behind the scenes of the D-Day debacle ARCHIVE.PH archived 8 Jun 2024 18:54:59 UTC  
    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Denied Manual Intervention Information


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6541 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my DPA letter to HBOS. After acknowledging my request & confirming copies of duplicate statements are on their way, they said the following:

 

"With regard to your request for information relating to manual intervention on your account, HBOS plc is under no statutory obligation to record this information and therefore I am unable to assist further with your request".

 

Can anyone tell me if the above statement is correct? I thought any information relating to personal details should be recorded and made available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can i just say this is a standard letter they are sending out now. I never even asked them about manual intervention and they sent me out that letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as we ie. the customer is concerned the fact that there has been no manual intervention is a good thing. It means they can't say that "someone" had to do something with your account that took time and therefore cost :)

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So then, if Rino's letter is the 'truth' then how can they justify such high charges for an automated system. If I were a shareholder and realised that we were using charges to pay for the IT/IS to run the Bank I would be gobbsmacked!! But I suppose as long as my divvies came in them I probably wouldn't give a monkey's. However, they cannot justify charging us such extortionate rates if that is the case - Hooorah!:razz:

Big Col:p

RBS LBA 20/06/06. WON - 21/10/06

MBNA(1)-Start-20/06/06, Claim-£250, 15/8 - Winner!!

MBNA Virgin(2)-Start-20/06/06, Claim £100, 15/8 - Winner!!

BoS MCard Data Protection Act Sent 20/06/06 - WON 16/10/06

Green On!

If the post/advice helps, pse click on the scales!! :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Old account

Received copies of my statements

Only entry for a charge was Returned chq fee of £20.00

However interest charges for the period when I was overlimit = £371.25

Apparently interest was refunded back to the account to the tune of £302.18

 

Also credit card insurance fees fluctuated considerably, starting at 72p per £100, rising to 73p per £100 when I went over my limit. The amount paid in total = £312.46.

 

 

 

Can I claim the difference of £69.07 plus the £20 late fee?

Can I claim back all interest including interest paid before I went overlimit?

Can I claim back my Credit Card Insurance as I was never unemployed for the period of the card ownership?

Which template letter would be the best to use? Or have I lucked out on this one?

Any help with these queries would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you weren't unemployed during the period of insurance does not mean you can claim the money back. Insurance is there in case something happens, in your case it it didn't but you can't have your money back! Would be a great policy if it did lol

I'm puzzled over what interest you want to claim back. You could only claim back any interest you paid on the £20 late fee, not interest on the total amount owing as that rightfully had interest applied to it.

Pam.

 

If anything I've said helps you then please feel free to tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards the interest - interest was debited against my account and this interest went up considerably during & throughout the period I was overlimit, as if that was used instead of late fees to claw their money back. Also, they refunded some interest back to my account during its time, so why can't I claim for the rest they didn't refund?

 

Any replies would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...