Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Norton Finace PPI claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5899 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, We have a loan with Norton Finance and have now written to them 3 times asking for our miss-sold PPI to be returned to us each time they tell us they did not miss-sell the PPI. We now feel we have no option but to take them to court as they were not covered by the ombudsman at the time we took the loan out.

 

We were told we could only take out the loan if we took the PPI, even though my wife was already covered and I could not be covered due to my health, The PPI only lasted 5 years even though the loan was longer than that and it was all paid as part of the loan forcing us to borrow more than we wanted. We only received one set of loan papers with the optional PPI box already ticked and were never given any figures without PPI.

We have copies of their computer records and they are laughable and incomplete.

 

Any one else had dealings with Norton Finance or advice on how to proceed taking them through the small claims court? We have been offered help from companies who will take it on with a no-win no-fee and again anyone had any success this way?

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other will have to advise as far as Norton Finance are concerned, however to answer you other questions. Certainly if you had alternative cover, and you were given no option but to take the PPI, then it was missold.

 

Have a good read through the stickies at the top of the PPI forum, and you will find loads of useful information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice. We have now been told by Norton for the 3rd time!!!! that they have dealt with our complaint and see no grounds to repay our PPI. So we feel we have no option but to go to the small cliams court.

Anyone done this? any help or advice would be great.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Iv been fighting with Norton Finance since November 2006, they have told me time and time again that it was the broker a Mr coultas who actually contacted them regarding my loan, Norton Finance / London Mortgage Company provided. Iv spoke to Mr Coultas on many occasions and he has informed me that the box is always ticked up front and that Norton Finance do this so we asume that if we don't sign then we will not get the loan he also has said he would come to Court to support this if required.

 

My box was ticked for me, and we were quoted the monthly repayment including the PPI, (no other figures were quoted without the PPI) so the PPI was assumptively sold to us.

I also had a pre exsisting medical condition and also an insurance in place for £100.000 already so we did not me any PPI.

The other fact is, I did,nt know of Sterling Insurance, there was no suggestion that the insurance was with them even with all the S A R correspondance from L M C. and Nortn Finance.

I wrote a letter to Sterling on 4th January 2008 asking for 40% of it back

and yesterday received a phone call from a very nice lady offering us the 40% although she said this was not usually pratice as I should have informed Sterling when the Loan was paid of and to cancel the PPI. How could we cancel a PPI insurance if we did,nt know who it was with.

Any way will fight through the Courts for the other 60% plus interest,

but nice to have £2440 to pay some of the bills.

 

By the way the nice lady from Sterling said she did,nt even have a telehone number for us, she had to ring LMC for it as we were also not in the Directory. I would have thought that is you had a insurance with any Company they would have all your details on file

 

 

Lv Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for the info.

Norton have said over and over they did not miss sell the PPI (they did on more that 3 points) and like you the box was ticked for us, and we were quoted the monthly repayment including the PPI, ane we also had no other figures quoted without the PPI so we are now resigned to taking them to court.

We have just sent a letter to them recorded delivery, saying that we feel we have no option but to take them to court. I'll let everyone know what happens next.

Why is that you have not taken them to court since it has gone on for so long?

Anyone else having dealings with Norton Finance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

yes, i too have had dealings with norton finance. i've had their final responce letter stating that they did not mis sell the ppi on a loan. My ppi box was also ticked on my behalf I also had assurance of £100k cover and recieve full sick pay for 6 months so didn't need the cover but they said that nemo would refuse my loan without ppi. They seem to be also relying on telephone conversations. I'm gonna SAR them to see what info they actually have. Also I did not recieve any other figures for the secured loan only those with ppi ticked as they said that I'd agreed for them to do this over the phone. I didn't have any choice! I had no idea it was gonna cost so much or that it was only for the first 5 years on a 25 year loan:mad: not sure what my next step will be? is it worth complaining to the financial ombudsman??

Your post is from Jan, hows your claim going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our claim is still on going with Norton.

We have not be able to take them to court just yet due to lack of funds on our part.

The funny thing is, Norton Finance keep sending us mail shots stating “some time ago we had the pleasure of arranging a loan for you“! :lol: So I use their pre paid envelope to send them a letter reminding them that I will not let this go and send copies of all the letters we have sent in the one envelope, I always mark it for the attention of the Managing Director, so far they have just ignored these letters.

They treated us exactly the same as you and have effectively called us liars.:-x

When we took out the loan with them they were not covered by the ombudsman and did not record any phone calls (very convenient) but the transcripts of their calls that they sent us have huge bits missing.

As soon as we can afford it we will be taking them to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...