Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Reprimand issued to Birmingham Children’s Trust Community Interest company in respect of Article 5(1)(f) and 32(1)(b) and 2. A child protection plan containing inappropriate personal data, in the form of criminal allegations against a child, was sent to the family the plan was produced for. Although the care plan itself was authorised for the family to view, the criminal allegations were not relevant to the plan, or authorised for the family’s view. The investigation highlighted that appropriate technical and organisational measures were not in place at the time of the breach.View the full article
    • Does anyone know what legal term I need to use to say they have to send a deferral form?
    • Just had another look through but I can't locate anything like that. They did, in a previous letter, reference my call in June 2021 but I cannot see this referenced in what they have sent. Worth requesting this specifically do you think? 
    • I see the poops (how appropriate) after 14 years of massively deteriorated monitoring and quality, are designating sewage polluted rivers as 'bathing water sites', presumably hoping that the high magic of designating them 'bathing water sites' and trusting the water companies who have pored poo in thewater for profit - will at least monitor it better if not stop polluting after the magic ritual. Undoubtedly this feeble effort has nothing to do with a GE pending after 14 years of abuse eh?   Four wild swimming spots along the River Dart in Devon that suffer from high levels of sewage pollution have been designated by the Government as “bathing water sites“.   River Dart given 'bathing' status after swimmers desert it over sewage concerns INEWS.CO.UK Bathing water sites welcome their new designation - but warn much work is needed to ensure pollution levels are reduced   A poop Overlord was alleged to have been heard mutter - well if we win the election, we dont care what any monitors say and we'll just bury the results, and if labour win its their problem.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Spikey vs MBNA


spikeyboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6511 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Data Protection Act request letter sent 31st May 2006, heard nothing so sent Stuart Johnson and email, he confirmed reciept and would be sending the details soon.

 

Still hadnt heard anyhting so email Stuart again, was advised the information was posted to me on Friday.

 

Still nothing as of this mornings post - how long does it take to get through the post !!!!!

 

Another email sent this monring to find out if it was actually sent on Friday and to what adddress.

 

11 days remaining out of the 40 allowed.

 

 

Seems they are rather busy at the moment - SS your taking up to much of their time :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you my friend !

 

For what it's worth, i had a letter from Shane Flynn who used to be their ceo and it took 10 days to arrive. Don't always believe what they tell you about letters being sent. I have been told loads of different stories and very seldom does the letter arrive when you think it will and invariably the date on the letter does not coincide with what they have told you over the phone !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still nothing in the post, and no response to a chaser emails sent to Stuart Johnson yesterday and today.

 

Sent a further chaser to Gareth - but no reply.

 

10th July is the deadline - may need assistance if i dont get by then, im not doing any more chasing now - they have had their chance, although i am wondering if they are sending stuff to the right address as i havent had a statement from them for about 3 months and didnt recieve a confirmation reciept for my DPA request - still this shouldnt matter as i was recieving statements to my current address (moved 2 years ago and advised them of new address) plus my letter stated my current address.

 

I can now see why so many are hating MBNA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no replies to emails so just rang them - DPA info was sent to my old address!!!! acording to their records i never changed my address, funny how i was receiving statements to my new adress up to around 3 months ago, not to mention i put my current address on the DPA letter.

 

 

These guys really are shocking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

spikey, go ballistic mate. ask them what they intend on doing to rectify matters. The fact that somebody else now knows you spending habits is quite embarrassing and what other info have they now got that could be used fraudulently if the new occupiers of that house were that way inclined. Blatant balls up on their part, make them suffer.

 

Remember, to make a claim through the courts under Data Protection Act you must also suffer damages as well as distress. Record the cost of calls and letters etc and then bang the distress claim on top of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still no replies to emails so just rang them - Data Protection Act info was sent to my old address!!!! acording to their records i never changed my address, funny how i was receiving statements to my new adress up to around 3 months ago, not to mention i put my current address on the DPA letter.

 

 

These guys really are shocking.

 

Ive read about similar things like that, thats happened to other people on here!!!

 

keep up the good work!!!

 

Delly x

Halifax cc Won settled in full after moneyclaim.

 

 

MBNA WON SETTLED IN FULL....

 

 

IKEA Data Protection Act sent 12/7/06 prelim sent 11/08/2006 gone to moneyclaim Ikea said they,d pay up but have yet to see the money

 

 

Halifax current Won!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

Spoke to MBNA again last week, was advised that the list of fees was sent out to my new address and i would recieve later that week, i asked if it was just a list of fees or full statements so i could work out the interest incured, was advise that it was just a list of the fees, after some twoing and frowing MBNA agreed that they would send another letter with the list of fees and they would calculate the interest.

 

Letter for list of fees arrived Thursday

 

Letter with list of fees and interest arrived Friday

 

Funnly enough in their list of fees with interest they made one mistake by putting an extra £20 charge in - however the final figures listed at the bottom of the page are correct (i know this as i typed out all the fees into excel spread sheets).

Link to post
Share on other sites

spikey, you 're not the first mate but well done. Seems to me that if you get the right person that end you can do it all in one go. I chose not too in order to make their life hell but see no reason why you shouldn't try what is best for you. We must remember though that these guys are trained negiotiators and have the comanies best interest at heart, yet what they will say on the phone can and frequently does differ when it appears in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I held back saying it was settle until the amount had been refunded to my card. I did speak to a few people at MBNA and have to say every one of them was very helpfull. Basically they want to resolve these matters as quickly and painlessly as possible and certainly dont want to go to court.

 

If anyone one wants details on how to get the matter resolved quickly drop me a PM, there are reasons i dont want to say how on here and will explain in the PM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fantastic mate! well done!!!

:D

Halifax cc Won settled in full after moneyclaim.

 

 

MBNA WON SETTLED IN FULL....

 

 

IKEA Data Protection Act sent 12/7/06 prelim sent 11/08/2006 gone to moneyclaim Ikea said they,d pay up but have yet to see the money

 

 

Halifax current Won!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...