Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Other case law relied upon " On other record of reasons "
    • Page 2 – document 10 and 11 – you should include the fact that it is a Law reform commission report. Best to give it its full name if you can I suggest that you move paragraph 10 up to the first position – paragraph 5 and move everything down. I think other than that – it is good to go. I suggest you don't bother to do any more drafts. Simply rearrange the paragraphs as I suggested above then the title of the documents that you are relying on in the index page. Send it off and post your final version here so that everybody can see. I'm sorry about the delay. Thanks for reminding me
    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Express/ERC *Withdrawn - costs liabilty*


gizmo111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6284 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

This is the letter I have ready for Mortgage Expres swith a view to reclaiming my ERC. Does anything need adding or taking out that anyone can see?

Thanks for help

Mortgage account no xxxxxxx

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges, and copy correspondence relating to my mortgage account since original offer in November 2001. Please include my original mortgage offer, and any subsequent amendments and details of further offer that was made in May 2003, to facilitate a house move. Please also supply copy of final redemption in April 2004.

At the time of opening this account, my surname was xxxxx and my address was xxxxxxxx

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 DPA subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest Jonnno

Just picking a random 1st post to read after registration I chose yours. I have to say I think you are barking up the wrong tree here. I have worked in the finance industry and can tell you that the Early Redemption Charge made by your lender is not covered at all by the OFT report into unfair charges.

 

Your lender will come back and say that when they offered you the mortgage they gave you a mortgage offer that explained that if you redeemed your mortgage before a certain time there would be an additional charge. This is normally the case on fixed rate or discounted rate mortgages and the lenders do this so they don't lose money when people swap immediately when their fix/discount comes to an end.

 

Your choice of course but I'd try a different tack entirely if you really want to try to get your ERC back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Gizmo

 

For the life of me, I can't see any mention of the OFT in your letter, so I don't understand the reply above this one.

 

Others have been tackling the same issue and I'm certain there has already been a refund.

 

Stick at this and let us know how you are getting along.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

On day 40 received all info from Mortgage Express - in nice display folders and in order. Product redemption fee was £5020.00. Interstingly in the notes to abbreviations it is shown as PENALTY INTEREST. Prelim to go off in next few days.

 

With this claim, I remortgaged to a rate of 6.6%, and the ERC was included in the new mortgage amount I have paid approx £783 interest on this so I presume I can add that into my prelim making a total claim of £5800, can I then at money claim stage add the 8% still?

 

Thanks

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be my understanding.. :-)

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gizzmo,

 

Having looked into the issue of interest paid on new debt to repay the ERC I don't think that you can claim it after all. This is because our claims are not based on breach of contract. Ie it is not us suing the bank for their breach of contract but we are the ones in breach of contract and we are thus claiming the return of money unlawfully taken from us in consequence. Our claims are actually based on the law of restitution which is based on unjust enrichment of the defendant. Thus our claims relate to what the defendant has gained rather than what we as claimants have lost. Therefore as the payment of interest on the new mortgage does not go to the defendant it can not be recovered.

 

You can still claim the statutory 8% at court stage in the normal way.

 

Sorry if I have mislead you in previous posts. It might actually help keep your claim in the small claims track.

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gizzmo,

 

Having looked into the issue of interest paid on new debt to repay the ERC I don't think that you can claim it after all. This is because our claims are not based on breach of contract. Ie it is not us suing the bank for their breach of contract but we are the ones in breach of contract and we are thus claiming the return of money unlawfully taken from us in consequence. Our claims are actually based on the law of restitution which is based on unjust enrichment of the defendant. Thus our claims relate to what the defendant has gained rather than what we as claimants have lost. Therefore as the payment of interest on the new mortgage does not go to the defendant it can not be recovered.

 

You can still claim the statutory 8% at court stage in the normal way.

 

Sorry if I have mislead you in previous posts. It might actually help keep your claim in the small claims track.

 

Zoot

 

Thanks - Just my luck that it is 5020 just over the 5K - still lets see how they respond.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When i sent dpa to mortgage express, all i received was 3 a4 pages

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

all transactions to include arrears review fee and dd refusal fees(quite a few)

but didnt receive anything about manual intervention so as i take it, there was none.

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did it include all the relevant info for the time periods?

 

Mortgage company SARs will generally have less info than current accounts as there is simply less activity.

 

I received everything the yhad all in order in plastic wallets including original apllication and telephone notes - on day 40

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i never got notes or applicant details but i got what i needed

-----------------------------------------------

Mortgage Express charges- settled in full after issuing claim

 

------------------------------------------------

To view the FAQ'S click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/faqs-please-read-these/

To view the PRELIM letter click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/516-1-data-protection-act.html

To view the Letter Before Action click here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-3-letter-before-action.html

To find Registered Address:

http://www.esd.informationcommissioner.gov.uk/esd/search.asp

 

 

If my advise helps click here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/reputation.php?p=366404

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Prelim ready for posting tomorrow.

 

Received a reply from ME as follows

 

As quoted from the office of fair trading ' Terms in comsumer which set the price or define the product or service being supplied are 'core terms' of the contract and are exempt from the test of fairness as long as they meeet the plain language requirement' I've enclosed the copy of the special conditions and would refer you to point 11 which I have highlighted. This sectyion of the contract details our tariff and in signing this document you agreed to our fees. T&C at the point of redemption clearly state there would be a ERC applicable.

 

So do I address this in LBA or just use the standard letter - bloody cheek I never considered the £5k I paid to be either a service or product that I received - a penealty was my thinking!

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is simply a roundabout way of saying you have not breached your contract and therefore they can charge what they like.

 

You could address this in your LBA, pointing out that the ERC is a charge in relation to a breach of contract and this therefore invokes the penalty provisions.

 

Or you can simply ignore their attempts at legal arguments as they have ignored yours!

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is simply a roundabout way of saying you have not breached your contract and therefore they can charge what they like.

 

You could address this in your LBA, pointing out that the ERC is a charge in relation to a breach of contract and this therefore invokes the penalty provisions.

 

Or you can simply ignore their attempts at legal arguments as they have ignored yours!

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

 

Any thoughts on this - have I put in enough?

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

Thank you for your letter of 04 October regarding Early Repayment Charge of £5020.03, which was made on the above account.

I refer to the following statements in your letter

As quoted from the office of fair trading ' Terms in consumer contracts which set the price or define the product or service being supplied are 'core terms' of the contract and are exempt from the test of fairness as long as they meet the plain language requirement' I've enclosed the copy of the special conditions and would refer you to point 11 which I have highlighted. This section of the contract details our tariff of fees and in signing this document you’ve agreed to these charges.

Your terms and conditions at the point of redemption clearly state that there would be an Early Repayment Charge applicable.

It is my belief that the Early Repayment Charge is in fact a penalty for breach of contract rather than as suggested by yourself a charge for the supply of a service or product. My letter to you dated 18th September does in fact draw your attention to other statements from the Office of Fair Trading, and also relevant statute and common law. May I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the legal principles outlined in that letter so as to be sure that you understand the legal basis for my request for repayment of the Early Redemption Charge, of £5020.03.

Since paying the fee I now understand that such fees are unlawful and unenforceable as outlined in our previous letter. We would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that we opened our account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated our account in this way as we had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as our fiduciary. We require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then we shall initiate court proceedings against you for the full amount, plus interest, plus costs and without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gizmo

Suggested addition in red to clarify on the breach of contract issue.

Best of luck

Zoot

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

 

Thank you for your letter of 04 October regarding Early Repayment Charge of £5020.03, which was made on the above account.

 

I refer to the following statements in your letter

 

As quoted from the office of fair trading ' Terms in consumer contracts which set the price or define the product or service being supplied are 'core terms' of the contract and are exempt from the test of fairness as long as they meet the plain language requirement' I've enclosed the copy of the special conditions and would refer you to point 11 which I have highlighted. This section of the contract details our tariff of fees and in signing this document you’ve agreed to these charges.

 

Your terms and conditions at the point of redemption clearly state that there would be an Early Repayment Charge applicable.

 

It is my belief that the Early Repayment Charge is in fact a penalty for breach of contract rather than as suggested by yourself a charge for the supply of a service or product in that I/we terminated the mortgage contract before the contractually agreed period of XX years.

 

This term of the contract was clearly stated in the written mortgage offer signed by myself (and XXX?). The terms of which were incorporated by reference into the mortgage deed which was not only signed by us but also witnessed. There is clearly no room for doubt that such a clause existed in the contract. Similarly, there is no question that we in fact redeemed the mortgage on the xx/xx/xxxx as evidenced by our final redemption statement. This date is clearly well before the contractually agreed date of xx/xx/xxxx and thus represents a clear breach of the contract.

My letter to you dated 18th September does in fact draw your attention to other statements from the Office of Fair Trading, and also relevant statute and common law. May I suggest that you familiarise yourself with the legal principles outlined in that letter so as to be sure that you understand the legal basis for my request for repayment of the Early Redemption Charge, of £5020.03.

 

Since paying the fee I now understand that such fees are unlawful and unenforceable as outlined in our previous letter. We would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that we opened our account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated our account in this way as we had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as our fiduciary. We require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then we shall initiate court proceedings against you for the full amount, plus interest, plus costs and without further notice.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Final response received today - ERC is not a penalty but a reasonable pre-estimate of the loss we would suffer. Rates are carefully calculated over a period of time to ensure we do not make a loss. Seems the only thing missing is - oh I know a breakdown of their costs .... Claim to be prepared later 5020.03 +interest!

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel another money claim coming on!

 

Best of luck

 

Zoot

 

N1 ready for posting - including costs and interest £6265.78 - put in joint names but does partner have to attend court if it goes that far or can I go without him?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can do so on your own

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...