Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LloydsTSB / BCW / FoS


reduk054
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am in exactly the same position with my daughter's claim against Capital One. I did pursue it through to the Ombudsman who agreed with the Adjudicator's decision. As far as they are concerned just because no credit agreement exists doesn't mean that there isn't a debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks surprise for helping me out on this one,about the Ombudsman/adjudicator, and how awful for you and your daughter's claim. Will it be court for you next, and how damaging has the decision by the FOS been, will a court also rule against you too, based on the FOS decision?

I have other cases which potentially may go to the FOS, but I am seriously reconsidering. I think that I have not achieved anything, other than a huge waste of my time, and no doubt rattled the bank in the meantime, which they will take much pleasure in coming back to me for money.

Oh dear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Surprise, I fully empathise with your predicament, and can understand your decision following the involvement of the FOS.

My adjudicator needs a large poke with a big stick.

I am going to try and send my letter today to the FOS (if I can get all my points across clearly, been struggling with the letter, as it needs to be good, even though I doubt that the ajudicator will change their mind!).

Still waiting for my aknowledgement email regarding my latest letters sent. I feel really unimportant!

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once its referred to the Ombudsman you will get an acknowledgement stating that they will reply in 8 weeks. Exactly 8 weeks when I received my letter. Personally, I felt it was a complete waste of time as I put in extra hours gathering info quoting OFT's Guidelines all to no avail. Remember though when LLoyds come chasing they still need a signed agreement with all the prescribed terms.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well the FOS have let me down big time, IMO they have not read the complaints/supporting documents or arguments properly. I will have one last ditch attempt by requesting the dispute is put before an Ombudsman, but I have yet to have read of a case where the Ombudsman disagrees with the adjudicator. I just feel that none of my points have been understood, and I am soooooo fustrated!

Sadly this is not related to CCA arguments, so LLoyds will be laughing all over me when the FOS write through to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know how you feel, but personally I wouldn't get too wound up, its not worth it. I think if you do complain to the Ombudsman I think it will be just another 8 weeks of wasted time. I think all these regulatory bodies are a waste of space they are supposed to be mediators but how can they mediate when they don't understand the law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, I am inclined to agree with your conviction regarding the FOS.

My fustration is construed purely by the FOS inability to be thorough, to be objective, and to use common sense, based on facts and not a one-sided argument (ie what the bank say must be correct, even though I have proved that they have lied!)

I will escalate the claim to the Ombudsman, not because I enjoy my own pain and suffering, however it will enable me to make further decisions regarding my claim, ie potential court action.

I absolutely refuse to pay the bank charges levied through their own incompetancies, regardless of what the FOS say!

I have to reply by the first week of August to my adjudicator, so that should give me a few more days to calm down. The cheek of it is, although I have sent approx 40 letters of correspondence between me and the bank, argued admirably, the adjudicator still is insisting on further proof that my claim should be assessed further.

Honestly!

Oh well, I may go into the Guiness Book of Records as the first person to have an Ombudsman disagree with the adjudicator! And then again....

Thanks for your support! Much appreciated.

Red x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

My last letter has been drafted, to request that my case should be looked at by an Ombudsman, and reiterating my points which I feel should have been addressed (if not by the bank, then certainly by the adjudicator!!).

All I have asked for is to be put into the same position that I was (broke, but not over-broke!!) before.

Not asked for compensation (did not read Really Mad Woman's sticky on complaining to the FOS before I started my claim), just something IMO fair and reasonable.

We are only talking a tiny little sum here, and my credit rating (which is awful any way), but its the principle of the matter.

Sadly I don't think that the FOS will change their mind, but I will go down fighting!!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with this. I have still one more case with the FOS and thats against CitiCards. Because the FOS have had this claim since June 07 Citicards sold the debt to 1st Credit. This has caused extra agro from 1st Credit so I have complained bitterly to the FOS and OFT. The FOS contacted Citi to ask them to suspend collection until negotiations had been finalised. Citi agreed but they failed to inform the FOS that they had already sold the debt to 1st Credit. I received a letter from 1st Credit's so called Solicitors and I sent them a copy of the email from the FOS and things have now gone very quiet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surprise, thank you for your on-going support for my case.

With your latest FOS complaint, Have you sent a copy of 1st credit's solicitor's letter to the FOS? Although your complaint is on-going, the FOS would need to be made aware of Citicard's actions and surely this would in turn assist your complaint further?!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, last letter to my adjudicator, requesting Ombudsman involvement. Just reiterating that I should not be worse off financially or credit-rating blackened due to Lloyds mistakes.

Sent recorded....we will see!

If not then hey ho hey ho its off to court I go....:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well at least you have another 8 weeks before you will need to make any further decisions.

 

Very true! Just enough time for me to start the ball rolling via the courts about another Lloyds account, and bank charges!:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Have received a letter from the FOS regarding the outstanding case. Rather than being assigned to an ombudsman, another adjudicator has taken over my file due to my case not being dealt with fully by the previous adjudicator (who is on long term leave!).

So, am quite happy that I am back in the system so to speak!

All my low feelings about the FOS and their ability to look at cases in their entirity are currently suspended.

Should be interesting, as FOS are asking Lloyds for more statements!

In the meantime, Lloyds have not been in touch!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say, its wait and see. My Citicards has finally been dealt with to which I am satisfied. Citi took the account back to the figure it was when it went into dispute. I got my charges back plus £50 for the tone of one of their letters which I complained about. So a figure of £915 when 1st Credit were assigned it has now gone down to just under £300 which I happy to settle at.

 

I do have another case with the FOS which will be interesting. Following on from their failure with my daughter's claim with CapOne, CapOne have refused to deal with me. My daughter has mental health problems, and has signed authorisation for me to deal with this matter. The FOS were quite happy to negotiate with me but not CapOne. After several letters to them and four authorisations they kept writing to my daughter, so I gave them an ultimatum write to me or I will put a further complaint in with the FOS for harassment. They sent a default notice to her so I put a complaint for harassment two weeks ago and they have already written to CapOne. I am absolutely seething about CapOne on this issue so I will not let it go. As a gesture of goodwill and to get CapOne off our backs I even made a full and final settlement offer which they did not acknowledge.

 

Good luck with yours and I will let you know how CapOne goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Surprise,

OMG! What a nightmare you are having re CapOne. It always amazes me that where a company can be so vicious with one customer, they can be supportive and understanding with another! CapOne seem a little Jekell and Hyde, as with me they have been very competant, and understanding (best not speak too soon though!)

IMO, it does feel that I am not so alone with my problems (other than sharing thm on here!), when I contact the FOS, OFT and TS. It still seems though that companies still have the upper hand, and the clout, and the departments to apply the thumb screws, let alone their DCAs etc, regardless of these external bodies who are here to help and support Joe Public. It sounds as though the FOS have been excellent so far in your case, you must have a good contact at their end!

I have contacted my new adjudicator to aknowledge his letter, which did give a little light at the end of a long dark tunnel. Mind you, what I am quibbling about is financially a low low amount, but stress wise, very high! Lloyds in fairness have stopped contacting me since the FOS involvement, but I will still have to await the outcome, but definitely feeling more positive! :)

best of luck with your daughter's case, and yes please keep me informed!

I will do likewise, good or bad!!!!

Red

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...