-
Posts
1,226 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Post article
CAGMag
Blogs
Keywords
Everything posted by Homer67
-
The NTK is not compliant because it states you overstayed but does not state what their permitted parking period is. Anyway the permitted parking period cannot vary from the original period when planning permission for that car park was granted, I suspect it was an all day job or certainly longer than 2 hours 45 minutes. It's always worth getting on to the shops you visited socials and declaring how you will never shop there again and drop an email to the CEO of the store you spent most money it. Other than that it's waiting time for a Letter Before Claim, then snotty letter time. Be prepared for a flood of every increasing threatening letters from the PPC and their tame DCA.
-
In fact block their number and report their text as spam.
-
As the parking charge reason appears to be a 13 minute overstay I'd say this one has got not chance in Court as the minimum allowance is 10 minutes so they are trying it on because the car park was busy and it took you an extra 3 minutes to get out. Write the snotty letter and post it up here before you send it to be checked and stay off FMOTL wibble wobble sites, that pathway leads to nothing but trouble.
-
I see Andy has responded so I'll delete this.
-
Tesco banned - clubcard question
Homer67 replied to maxalex's topic in Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations.
That letter is a joke! It quotes the value of goods stolen (but they weren't) It quotes the value of goods recovered as £0 but they were fully recovered as they were never actually stolen as in removed from the store! Then it quotes 'Security Cost' so that's for Security to do their job, why would you be responsible for paying their wages?! Hilarious, ignore and don't worry about it. -
Being a first-time buyer is fun! But there are nuances..😁
Homer67 replied to pugilist's topic in Mortgage companies
I think that's what I'd do, try and make sure you have a bolt hole though. -
Being a first-time buyer is fun! But there are nuances..😁
Homer67 replied to pugilist's topic in Mortgage companies
That's what I meant by 'nothing legal'. If you refused to move out until a certain date and offered the same rate of pro rata rent I think the legal/illegal edges would be blurred, after all how long does it take to actually get someone evicted? Giving you a date to leave and evicting you are two different things. -
Being a first-time buyer is fun! But there are nuances..😁
Homer67 replied to pugilist's topic in Mortgage companies
Nothing legal comes to mind other than furniture into storage and sofa surf for a few weeks. -
@Ethel Street if the ex didn't have the contract in place before they were an ex and as quoted they took it out in the other party's name, then it's fraudulent to take out a credit agreement at an address you no longer reside at and in someone else's name.
-
I'd be reporting it to the Police as fraud and getting a crime number as well so at least he gets a visit/letter from Plod to come in for an interview, that might scare him into paying it and not doing anything similar again.
-
Limited company so you can't be personally liable.
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.